NameCensus.

UK surname

Silkstone

In the 1881 census there were 171 people recorded with the Silkstone surname, ranking it #14,212 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 282, ranked #15,406, down from #14,212 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Shirland, Whitkirk (Seacroft), Thorner (Shadwell) and Blackwell. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Leeds, Rotherham and Bassetlaw.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Silkstone is 312 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 64.9%.

1881 census count

171

Ranked #14,212

Modern count

282

2016, ranked #15,406

Peak year

1911

312 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Silkstone had 171 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,212 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 282 in 2016, ranked #15,406.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 312 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Small Town Suburbia.

Silkstone surname distribution map

The map shows where the Silkstone surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Silkstone surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Silkstone over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 96 #17,594
1861 historical 106 #20,147
1881 historical 171 #14,212
1891 historical 239 #13,173
1901 historical 279 #12,225
1911 historical 312 #11,130
1997 modern 289 #13,859
1998 modern 297 #13,967
1999 modern 293 #14,175
2000 modern 295 #14,070
2001 modern 284 #14,221
2002 modern 271 #14,966
2003 modern 271 #14,787
2004 modern 278 #14,609
2005 modern 271 #14,780
2006 modern 264 #15,170
2007 modern 270 #15,080
2008 modern 278 #14,901
2009 modern 286 #14,910
2010 modern 282 #15,410
2011 modern 294 #14,798
2012 modern 292 #14,770
2013 modern 287 #15,224
2014 modern 284 #15,455
2015 modern 276 #15,673
2016 modern 282 #15,406

Geography

Back to top

Where Silkstones are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Shirland, Whitkirk (Seacroft), Thorner (Shadwell), Blackwell, Wingfield, North and St Werburgh. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Leeds, Rotherham and Bassetlaw. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Shirland Derbyshire
2 Whitkirk (Seacroft), Thorner (Shadwell) Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Blackwell Nottinghamshire
4 Wingfield, North Derbyshire
5 St Werburgh Derbyshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Leeds 089 Leeds
2 Rotherham 029 Rotherham
3 Leeds 075 Leeds
4 Bassetlaw 003 Bassetlaw
5 Leeds 069 Leeds

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Silkstone

These lists show first names that appear often with the Silkstone surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Silkstone

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Silkstone, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Small Town Suburbia

Nationally, the Silkstone surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Small Town Suburbia, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Silkstone household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group is predominantly comprised of married couples with no resident dependent children, living in areas characterised neither by under-occupancy nor overcrowding throughout the UK in or adjacent to small towns. White ethnic groups and affiliation with Christianity predominates. Housing tends to be predominantly semi-detached or detached and workers are employed principally in managerial and professional occupations, with semi-skilled occupations also in evidence. These areas of the Supergroup are of higher population density.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

City Support Workers

Within London, Silkstone is most associated with areas classed as City Support Workers, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered throughout Inner London, these areas house relatively few workers in the most senior roles within organisations, and greater prevalence of administrative roles relative to the Supergroup mean. Residents are less likely to be of Chinese ethnicity and are more likely to have been born in Africa. Relative to the Supergroup average, residents are also more likely to live in social housing and live in overcrowded conditions.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Silkstone is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Silkstone falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Silkstone is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Silkstone, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Silkstone families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Silkstone surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 49 Silkstones recorded in 1881 and an index of 2.96x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 49 2.96x
Derbyshire 46 17.62x
Lancashire 26 1.31x
Lincolnshire 10 3.75x
Middlesex 8 0.48x
Nottinghamshire 8 3.56x
Glamorgan 6 2.07x
Somerset 5 1.86x
Buckinghamshire 4 3.97x
Oxfordshire 4 3.88x
Monmouthshire 2 1.66x
Sussex 2 0.71x
Cheshire 1 0.27x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Leeds in Yorkshire leads with 18 Silkstones recorded in 1881 and an index of 19.29x.

Place Total Index
Leeds 18 19.29x
Seacroft 16 2051.28x
Shirland 12 615.38x
Blackwell 10 781.25x
Manchester 10 11.24x
Bradford 8 86.39x
Llantrisant 6 81.97x
Moss Side 6 57.64x
Bedminster 5 19.82x
Derby St Peter 5 60.10x
Measham 5 520.83x
Rawmarsh 5 85.62x
Spittlegate 5 135.50x
Stretton 5 1388.89x
Thornhill 5 103.73x
Bletchley 4 1379.31x
Carlton Scroop 4 3076.92x
Kensington London 4 4.31x
Nottingham St Mary 4 6.88x
Oxford St Giles 4 81.47x
Fairfield 3 171.43x
Tansley 3 769.23x
Eastbourne 2 15.46x
Morley 2 23.28x
St Pancras London 2 1.49x
Trevethin 2 17.56x
Winthorpe 2 1333.33x
Wortley In Bramley 2 15.28x
Ashover 1 76.92x
Blackburn 1 1.90x
Broughton In Salford 1 5.52x
Claylane 1 27.55x
Duffield 1 48.54x
Grantham 1 28.74x
Great Boughton 1 78.74x
Newark Upon Trent 1 12.38x
Nottingham Standard 1 175.44x
Sheffield 1 1.90x
St Andrew Holborn 1 17.70x
Westminster St 1 16.26x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Silkstone surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Silkstone surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 17
William 12
George 8
Joseph 8
James 7
Henry 4
Samuel 4
Thomas 4
Charles 3
Albert 2
Arthur 2
Benjamin 2
Harry 2
Alfred 1
Ben 1
Benjn. 1
Earnest 1
Edward 1
Edwin 1
Francis 1
Frederick 1
Isiah 1
Jno. 1
Tom 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Silkstone surname: questions and answers

How common was the Silkstone surname in 1881?

In 1881, 171 people were recorded with the Silkstone surname. That placed it at #14,212 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Silkstone surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 282 in 2016. That gives Silkstone a modern rank of #15,406.

What does the Silkstone map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Silkstone bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.