NameCensus.

UK surname

Smails

In the 1881 census there were 86 people recorded with the Smails surname, ranking it #21,449 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 55, ranked #34,627, down from #21,449 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Warkworth and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Smails is 106 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 36.0%.

1881 census count

86

Ranked #21,449

Modern count

55

2016, ranked #34,627

Peak year

1851

106 bearers

Map years

1

1851 to 1851

Key insights

  • Smails had 86 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #21,449 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 55 in 2016, ranked #34,627.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 106 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Smails surname distribution map

The map shows where the Smails surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Smails surname density by area, 1851 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Smails over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 106 #16,512
1861 historical 79 #23,702
1881 historical 86 #21,449
1891 historical 95 #24,694
1901 historical 87 #24,386
1911 historical 57 #27,099
1997 modern 52 #32,444
1998 modern 56 #32,313
1999 modern 58 #32,268
2000 modern 58 #32,317
2001 modern 55 #32,482
2002 modern 53 #33,021
2003 modern 48 #33,533
2004 modern 49 #33,647
2005 modern 50 #33,784
2006 modern 45 #34,491
2007 modern 43 #34,845
2008 modern 44 #34,865
2009 modern 55 #34,355
2010 modern 58 #34,346
2011 modern 57 #34,393
2012 modern 48 #34,938
2013 modern 49 #34,952
2014 modern 50 #34,927
2015 modern 51 #34,834
2016 modern 55 #34,627

Geography

Back to top

Where Smails' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Warkworth, London parishes, Shilbottle and Preston. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Warkworth Northumberland
3 London parishes London 3
4 Shilbottle Northumberland
5 Preston Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Smails

These lists show first names that appear often with the Smails surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Smails

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Smails, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Smails surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Smails household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Smails is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Smails is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Smails, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Smails families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Smails surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Northumberland leads with 38 Smails' recorded in 1881 and an index of 30.45x.

County Total Index
Northumberland 38 30.45x
Durham 20 8.02x
Lancashire 9 0.90x
Yorkshire 7 0.84x
Devon 6 3.44x
Cumberland 5 6.92x
Staffordshire 1 0.35x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Fishwick in Lancashire leads with 9 Smails' recorded in 1881 and an index of 1451.61x.

Place Total Index
Fishwick 9 1451.61x
Cornsay 8 1194.03x
Hauxley 6 2142.86x
St Budeaux 6 1111.11x
Bishopwearmouth 5 23.34x
Burradon In Tynemouth 5 1562.50x
Lowick 5 1162.79x
Tynemouth 5 74.85x
Bedlington 4 95.92x
Cockermouth 4 263.16x
Shilbottle 4 3333.33x
Skelton In Guisbrough 4 177.78x
Stockton On Tees 4 33.25x
East Murton 3 638.30x
Ford 3 652.17x
Callaly Yetlington 2 2857.14x
Leeds 2 4.26x
Morpeth 2 136.05x
Eglingham 1 909.09x
Eglingham Crawley Hedgeley 1 1428.57x
Garforth 1 156.25x
Walsall Foreign 1 6.84x
Wigton 1 92.59x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Smails surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Jane 7
Mary 7
Alice 3
Margaret 3
Margret 3
Sarah 3
Ellen 2
Emma 2
Abigail 1
Amelia 1
Ann 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Barbara 1
Eleanor 1
Elizabeth 1
Francis 1
Georgina 1
Isabella 1
Louisa 1
Phebe 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Smails surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 9
George 6
Thomas 5
Joseph 3
William 3
Alfred 2
Andrew 2
James 2
Robert 2
Albert 1
Edward 1
Edwin 1
Frederick 1
Fredrick 1
Harry 1
Jno.Mann 1
Richard 1
Samuel 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Smails households.

FAQ

Smails surname: questions and answers

How common was the Smails surname in 1881?

In 1881, 86 people were recorded with the Smails surname. That placed it at #21,449 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Smails surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 55 in 2016. That gives Smails a modern rank of #34,627.

What does the Smails map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Smails bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.