NameCensus.

UK surname

Squelch

In the 1881 census there were 160 people recorded with the Squelch surname, ranking it #14,860 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 167, ranked #22,055, down from #14,860 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, New Windsor, Clewer and Dunsfold, Bramley, Shalford. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Thurrock, Pembrokeshire and Waverley.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Squelch is 229 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 4.4%.

1881 census count

160

Ranked #14,860

Modern count

167

2016, ranked #22,055

Peak year

1911

229 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Squelch had 160 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,860 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 167 in 2016, ranked #22,055.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 229 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Squelch surname distribution map

The map shows where the Squelch surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Squelch surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Squelch over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 120 #15,144
1861 historical 123 #17,914
1881 historical 160 #14,860
1891 historical 182 #15,983
1901 historical 220 #14,245
1911 historical 229 #13,712
1997 modern 164 #19,944
1998 modern 172 #19,883
1999 modern 179 #19,539
2000 modern 179 #19,494
2001 modern 169 #19,912
2002 modern 172 #20,108
2003 modern 163 #20,554
2004 modern 164 #20,609
2005 modern 161 #20,799
2006 modern 158 #21,229
2007 modern 167 #20,719
2008 modern 172 #20,523
2009 modern 183 #20,135
2010 modern 177 #21,034
2011 modern 167 #21,642
2012 modern 171 #21,303
2013 modern 166 #22,075
2014 modern 169 #22,006
2015 modern 169 #21,888
2016 modern 167 #22,055

Geography

Back to top

Where Squelchs are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, New Windsor, Clewer, Dunsfold, Bramley, Shalford, Birmingham Town: Birmingham and Wisborough Green (Billingshurst, Sussex), Cranley, Albury (Albury), Alfold, Ewhurst, Shere (Albury). These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Thurrock, Pembrokeshire and Waverley. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 3
2 New Windsor, Clewer Berkshire
3 Dunsfold, Bramley, Shalford Surrey
4 Birmingham Town: Birmingham Warwickshire
5 Wisborough Green (Billingshurst, Sussex), Cranley, Albury (Albury), Alfold, Ewhurst, Shere (Albury) Surrey

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Thurrock 018 Thurrock
2 Pembrokeshire 005 Pembrokeshire
3 Pembrokeshire 006 Pembrokeshire
4 Thurrock 012 Thurrock
5 Waverley 013 Waverley

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Squelch

These lists show first names that appear often with the Squelch surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Squelch

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Squelch, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Squelch surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Squelch household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Established Homeowners with Children

Within London, Squelch is most associated with areas classed as Established Homeowners with Children, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly British-born residents are typically married/in civil partnerships and own the properties in which they are raising their children. Parents are typically over 45, and many other residents are beyond normal retirement age. Detached and semi-detached houses predominate and multiple car ownership is common.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Squelch is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Squelch falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Squelch is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Squelch, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Squelch families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Squelch surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Surrey leads with 59 Squelchs recorded in 1881 and an index of 7.76x.

County Total Index
Surrey 59 7.76x
Berkshire 33 28.17x
Warwickshire 23 5.84x
Middlesex 14 0.90x
Sussex 9 3.42x
Staffordshire 8 1.52x
Yorkshire 7 0.45x
Hampshire 2 0.63x
Montgomeryshire 2 5.59x
Essex 1 0.32x
Gloucestershire 1 0.33x
Kent 1 0.19x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Birmingham in Warwickshire leads with 17 Squelchs recorded in 1881 and an index of 12.96x.

Place Total Index
Birmingham 17 12.96x
Clewer 16 333.33x
Dunsfold 15 3658.54x
Reading St Mary 9 95.95x
Thorpe 9 2727.27x
Cranleigh 8 720.72x
Handsworth 8 61.63x
Aston 6 5.54x
Egham 6 128.48x
Arundel 5 340.14x
Hendon 5 89.13x
Shipley 5 62.27x
Bray 4 116.28x
Hambledon 4 493.83x
New Windsor 4 1176.47x
Bramley 3 447.76x
Isleworth 3 43.23x
Wisborough Green 3 340.91x
Barnsley 2 12.54x
Chiswick 2 23.45x
Clapham 2 10.25x
Guildford St Mary 2 212.77x
Hillingdon 2 40.16x
Holdenhurst 2 23.84x
Old Windsor 2 147.06x
Pool 2 74.07x
Streatham 2 17.27x
Wargrave 2 198.02x
Berkeley 1 58.82x
Cuckfield 1 37.59x
Esher 1 94.34x
Godalming 1 20.88x
Norwood 1 28.01x
Penge 1 10.03x
St Martin In Fields 1 10.71x
Waltham Holy Cross 1 34.72x
Witley 1 185.19x
Woolwich 1 5.08x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Squelch surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 11
Elizabeth 6
Caroline 4
Eliza 4
Emily 4
Jane 4
Sarah 4
Ellen 3
Hannah 3
Alice 2
Ann 2
Catherine 2
Charlotte 2
Clara 2
Esther 2
Florence 2
Harriet 2
Maria 2
Ada 1
Adelade 1
Annie 1
Beatrice 1
Elizh. 1
Elizth. 1
Emma 1
Harriett 1
Kate 1
Margaret 1
Martha 1
Rebecca 1
Rosa 1
Rose 1
Sophia 1
Susanah 1
U. 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Squelch surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 17
Thomas 7
George 6
Henry 6
James 6
Alfred 5
John 5
Albert 4
Arthur 4
Frederick 4
Richard 3
Edward 2
Harry 2
Charles 1
Cornelius 1
Edwin 1
Frank 1
Israel 1
Joseph 1
Levi 1
R.E. 1
Robert 1
Walter 1
Willm. 1

FAQ

Squelch surname: questions and answers

How common was the Squelch surname in 1881?

In 1881, 160 people were recorded with the Squelch surname. That placed it at #14,860 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Squelch surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 167 in 2016. That gives Squelch a modern rank of #22,055.

What does the Squelch map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Squelch bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.