NameCensus.

UK surname

Strong

An English occupational surname for a strong man or someone with exceptional physical strength.

In the 1881 census there were 4,461 people recorded with the Strong surname, ranking it #1,005 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 5,748, ranked #1,169, down from #1,005 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Eden, Wolverhampton and Hammersmith and Fulham.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Strong is 6,062 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 28.9%.

1881 census count

4,461

Ranked #1,005

Modern count

5,748

2016, ranked #1,169

Peak year

1999

6,062 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Strong had 4,461 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #1,005 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 5,748 in 2016, ranked #1,169.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 5,772 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Strong surname distribution map

The map shows where the Strong surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Strong surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Strong over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 3,281 #880
1861 historical 3,105 #934
1881 historical 4,461 #1,005
1891 historical 4,632 #1,007
1901 historical 5,412 #1,032
1911 historical 5,772 #904
1997 modern 5,816 #1,128
1998 modern 6,009 #1,130
1999 modern 6,062 #1,127
2000 modern 6,030 #1,128
2001 modern 5,908 #1,127
2002 modern 6,023 #1,132
2003 modern 5,808 #1,142
2004 modern 5,814 #1,142
2005 modern 5,726 #1,137
2006 modern 5,697 #1,142
2007 modern 5,739 #1,145
2008 modern 5,712 #1,148
2009 modern 5,831 #1,151
2010 modern 5,934 #1,161
2011 modern 5,872 #1,162
2012 modern 5,761 #1,156
2013 modern 5,850 #1,159
2014 modern 5,849 #1,165
2015 modern 5,798 #1,160
2016 modern 5,748 #1,169

Geography

Back to top

Where Strongs are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff, Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, London parishes and St Pancras. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Eden, Wolverhampton and Hammersmith and Fulham. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Bristol City: St Mary Redcliff Gloucestershire
2 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
3 London parishes London 1
4 London parishes London 3
5 St Pancras London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Eden 006 Eden
2 Eden 004 Eden
3 Wolverhampton 033 Wolverhampton
4 Eden 003 Eden
5 Hammersmith and Fulham 002 Hammersmith and Fulham

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Strong

These lists show first names that appear often with the Strong surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Strong

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Strong, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Strong surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Strong household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Strong is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Strong is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Strong falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Strong is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Strong, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Strong

The surname Strong is an English name that dates back to the late 11th century. It is derived from the Old English word "strang," meaning strong, powerful, or vigorous. The name likely originated as a nickname for someone who possessed great physical strength or was known for their fortitude and resilience.

During the Middle Ages, surnames were often derived from physical characteristics, occupations, or place names. The use of the surname Strong can be found in various historical records, such as the Domesday Book of 1086, which was a survey of land and property ownership commissioned by William the Conqueror after the Norman Conquest of England.

One of the earliest recorded instances of the surname Strong is in the Pipe Rolls of Gloucestershire from 1194, where a person named William Strong is mentioned. Another early reference can be found in the Curia Regis Rolls of Northamptonshire from 1207, which lists a Hugo Strong.

The surname Strong has been associated with several notable figures throughout history. One of the earliest recorded individuals with this surname was Sir John Strong (c. 1360-1409), a prominent English soldier and landowner who served under King Richard II and King Henry IV. During the Wars of the Roses in the 15th century, Sir John Strong fought for the House of Lancaster.

Another notable bearer of the surname Strong was Edward Strong (1569-1645), an English clergyman and theologian who served as a chaplain to King James I and taught at the University of Cambridge. He is known for his work "The Doctrine of the Last Judgement," which was published in 1644.

In the 17th century, Nathaniel Strong (1601-1655) was an English Puritan minister who emigrated to the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630. He became one of the founders of the town of Taunton, Massachusetts, and served as the first minister of the Taunton Church.

During the American Revolutionary War, John Strong (1738-1799) was a prominent Connecticut merchant and patriot who served as a member of the Continental Congress and as a judge on the Superior Court of Connecticut.

In more recent times, the surname Strong has been associated with individuals such as Sir Archibald Strong (1831-1904), a British naval officer and explorer who served in the Royal Navy and was involved in the exploration of the Arctic regions.

The surname Strong has been found in various spellings over the centuries, including Stronge, Strang, and Stron. It has also been linked to certain place names in England, such as Strongford and Strongville, which may have influenced the development of the surname.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Strong families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Strong surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 557 Strongs recorded in 1881 and an index of 1.28x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 557 1.28x
Surrey 336 1.58x
Lancashire 305 0.59x
Durham 293 2.26x
Cumberland 291 7.75x
Devon 253 2.79x
Northumberland 192 2.96x
Sussex 186 2.53x
Warwickshire 179 1.63x
Gloucestershire 173 2.02x
Somerset 173 2.46x
Wiltshire 173 4.49x
Hampshire 147 1.64x
Kent 134 0.90x
Yorkshire 111 0.26x
Cheshire 74 0.77x
Oxfordshire 70 2.60x
Staffordshire 67 0.46x
Berkshire 65 1.99x
Dorset 64 2.24x
Cornwall 56 1.13x
Glamorgan 54 0.71x
Essex 48 0.56x
Monmouthshire 39 1.24x
Derbyshire 36 0.53x
Lanarkshire 34 0.24x
Worcestershire 34 0.60x
Nottinghamshire 30 0.51x
Perthshire 29 1.48x
Westmorland 28 2.92x
Herefordshire 24 1.34x
Lincolnshire 23 0.33x
Dumfriesshire 21 2.18x
Renfrewshire 16 0.47x
Ayrshire 15 0.46x
Stirlingshire 14 0.87x
Suffolk 14 0.26x
Buckinghamshire 13 0.49x
Shetland 13 2.92x
Hertfordshire 12 0.40x
Midlothian 10 0.17x
Northamptonshire 10 0.24x
Channel Islands 9 0.70x
Leicestershire 9 0.19x
Merionethshire 9 1.13x
Angus 7 0.17x
Bedfordshire 5 0.22x
Brecknockshire 4 0.46x
Aberdeenshire 2 0.05x
Norfolk 2 0.03x
Shropshire 2 0.05x
Cambridgeshire 1 0.04x
Peeblesshire 1 0.49x
Royal Navy 1 0.19x
Rutland 1 0.31x
Wigtownshire 1 0.17x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Brighton in Sussex leads with 74 Strongs recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.99x.

Place Total Index
Brighton 74 4.99x
Camberwell 62 2.23x
Kensington London 58 2.39x
Foleshill 54 46.68x
St Pancras London 52 1.48x
Islington London 51 1.21x
Lambeth 50 1.32x
Aston 39 1.29x
Blackburn 37 2.69x
Paddington London 35 2.18x
Rotherhithe 35 6.50x
Newington 34 2.11x
Tanfield 34 22.04x
Barrow In Furness 32 4.55x
St Marylebone London 30 1.29x
Birmingham 29 0.79x
West Ham 29 1.53x
Calstock 28 28.92x
Chelsea London 27 2.05x
Crediton 27 31.40x
Gateshead 27 2.78x
Westbury On Trym 27 9.32x
Caldbeck 26 147.90x
Deptford St Paul 26 2.27x
Bristol St Philip Jacob 25 3.10x
Fulham London 25 3.95x
Hackney London 25 1.02x
Lewes St John 25 306.37x
Toxteth Park 25 1.43x
Portsea 24 1.37x
Penrith 23 16.58x
Tiverton 23 14.71x
Bethnal Green London 21 1.11x
Enford 21 160.43x
Kings Norton 21 4.11x
Kirkdale 21 2.41x
Thornbury 20 34.21x
Bermondsey 19 1.46x
Cramlington 19 22.16x
Drewsteignton 19 158.07x
Hailey 19 100.48x
Hetton Le Hole 19 11.56x
Wingate 18 20.24x
Bishopwearmouth 17 1.53x
Bridgewater 17 8.92x
Nottingham St Mary 17 1.12x
Reading St Mary 17 6.48x
Seaham 17 35.95x
Bedwellty 16 2.87x
Clerkenwell London 16 1.55x
Coventry St Michael 16 4.53x
Hammersmith London 16 1.49x
Hove 16 4.96x
Southwark St George Martyr 16 1.82x
Wandsworth 16 3.81x
Williton 16 68.06x
Woolwich 16 2.91x
Odcombe 15 161.12x
Radway 15 392.67x
Warminster 15 17.75x
Wigton 15 26.65x
Carhampton 14 145.38x
Dryfesdale 14 31.54x
Falkirk 14 3.72x
Hesket In Forest 14 47.78x
St George Hanover 14 2.46x
West Derby 14 0.92x
West Newton Allonby 14 107.03x
Wigan 14 1.94x
Andover 13 15.40x
Brandon Byshottles 13 8.00x
Fovant 13 155.50x
Glasgow 13 0.52x
Littlehampton 13 22.15x
North Petherton 13 22.96x
Shoreditch London 13 0.69x
St Decumans Watchet 13 73.20x
Chester Le Street 12 12.05x
Edgbaston 12 3.52x
Stoke Newington London 12 3.53x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Strong surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 323
Elizabeth 202
Sarah 134
Jane 94
Ann 75
Emma 74
Alice 65
Ellen 64
Eliza 63
Margaret 63
Annie 57
Emily 54
Hannah 43
Martha 35
Isabella 33
Charlotte 31
Louisa 31
Edith 27
Frances 27
Harriet 27
Ada 25
Fanny 24
Maria 23
Florence 22
Lucy 22
Susan 22
Caroline 21
Agnes 20
Catherine 16
Harriett 15
Kate 15
Amy 14
Anne 14
Amelia 13
Clara 13
Grace 13
Matilda 12
Rebecca 12
Jessie 9
Sophia 9
Anna 8
Beatrice 8
Dorothy 8
Elizth. 8
Julia 8
Lydia 8
Rose 8
Ruth 7
Eleanor 6
Selina 6

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Strong surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 280
John 253
George 164
Thomas 152
James 143
Joseph 91
Charles 89
Henry 89
Robert 80
Alfred 38
Edward 38
Frederick 37
Richard 30
Walter 29
Ernest 27
Arthur 26
Albert 24
Frank 24
Samuel 18
Harry 16
Herbert 16
Wm. 16
Francis 13
Isaac 12
Thos. 12
Benjamin 11
Edwin 9
David 8
Sidney 8
Tom 7
Fredk. 6
Jonathan 6
Nicholas 6
Andrew 5
Anthony 5
Chas. 5
Daniel 5
Fred 5
Geo. 5
Leonard 5
Matthew 5
Sydney 5
Willm. 5
Christopher 4
Eli 4
Mark 4
Percy 4
Peter 4
Ralph 4
Reuben 4

FAQ

Strong surname: questions and answers

How common was the Strong surname in 1881?

In 1881, 4,461 people were recorded with the Strong surname. That placed it at #1,005 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Strong surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 5,748 in 2016. That gives Strong a modern rank of #1,169.

What does the Strong surname mean?

An English occupational surname for a strong man or someone with exceptional physical strength.

What does the Strong map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Strong bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.