NameCensus.

UK surname

Struggles

In the 1881 census there were 53 people recorded with the Struggles surname, ranking it #26,134 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 118, ranked #27,873, down from #26,134 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, St Werburgh and Manchester. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Rotherham, North Kesteven and Shropshire.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Struggles is 137 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 122.6%.

1881 census count

53

Ranked #26,134

Modern count

118

2016, ranked #27,873

Peak year

1998

137 bearers

Map years

4

1911 to 2016

Key insights

  • Struggles had 53 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #26,134 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 118 in 2016, ranked #27,873.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 102 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Struggles surname distribution map

The map shows where the Struggles surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Struggles surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Struggles over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 38 #26,502
1861 historical 31 #30,058
1881 historical 53 #26,134
1891 historical 77 #27,169
1901 historical 97 #23,227
1911 historical 102 #22,465
1997 modern 127 #23,352
1998 modern 137 #22,922
1999 modern 137 #23,083
2000 modern 128 #24,015
2001 modern 129 #23,557
2002 modern 132 #23,680
2003 modern 123 #24,497
2004 modern 126 #24,335
2005 modern 115 #25,702
2006 modern 115 #25,969
2007 modern 119 #25,747
2008 modern 123 #25,505
2009 modern 128 #25,427
2010 modern 122 #26,876
2011 modern 122 #26,647
2012 modern 119 #27,100
2013 modern 125 #26,695
2014 modern 122 #27,358
2015 modern 118 #27,833
2016 modern 118 #27,873

Geography

Back to top

Where Struggles' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, St Werburgh, Manchester, St Marylebone and Bradford. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Rotherham, North Kesteven, Shropshire and Sheffield. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 St Werburgh Derbyshire
3 Manchester Lancashire
4 St Marylebone London (North Districts)
5 Bradford Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Rotherham 030 Rotherham
2 North Kesteven 007 North Kesteven
3 Shropshire 004 Shropshire
4 Rotherham 013 Rotherham
5 Sheffield 006 Sheffield

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Struggles

These lists show first names that appear often with the Struggles surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Struggles

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Struggles, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Struggles surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Struggles household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Struggles is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Struggles is most concentrated in decile 4 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

4
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Struggles falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Struggles is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Struggles, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Struggles families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Struggles surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 13 Struggles' recorded in 1881 and an index of 2.52x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 13 2.52x
Yorkshire 11 2.15x
Lancashire 10 1.63x
Lincolnshire 9 10.89x
Derbyshire 5 6.18x
Nottinghamshire 4 5.74x
Surrey 1 0.40x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Chorlton On Medlock in Lancashire leads with 10 Struggles' recorded in 1881 and an index of 102.67x.

Place Total Index
Chorlton On Medlock 10 102.67x
Heckington 8 2580.65x
Sheffield 8 49.08x
St Marylebone London 7 25.37x
Derby St Werburgh 5 107.07x
Hillingdon 5 303.03x
Mansfield 4 165.98x
Headingley Cum Burley 3 90.91x
Kingston On Thames 1 16.53x
Paddington London 1 5.26x
Spittlegate 1 87.72x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Struggles surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Struggles surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 6
John 3
James 2
Joseph 2
Thomas 2
William 2
Albt. 1
Albt.E. 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Frederick 1
Richard 1
Walter 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Struggles households.

FAQ

Struggles surname: questions and answers

How common was the Struggles surname in 1881?

In 1881, 53 people were recorded with the Struggles surname. That placed it at #26,134 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Struggles surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 118 in 2016. That gives Struggles a modern rank of #27,873.

What does the Struggles map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Struggles bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.