NameCensus.

UK surname

Throp

In the 1881 census there were 226 people recorded with the Throp surname, ranking it #11,889 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 166, ranked #22,140, down from #11,889 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Birstall and Bradford. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include West Oxfordshire, Bradford and Isle of Wight.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Throp is 269 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 26.5%.

1881 census count

226

Ranked #11,889

Modern count

166

2016, ranked #22,140

Peak year

1901

269 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Throp had 226 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,889 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 166 in 2016, ranked #22,140.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 269 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Throp surname distribution map

The map shows where the Throp surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Throp surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Throp over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 187 #10,978
1861 historical 200 #12,005
1881 historical 226 #11,889
1891 historical 258 #12,440
1901 historical 269 #12,518
1911 historical 256 #12,688
1997 modern 199 #17,668
1998 modern 201 #18,047
1999 modern 200 #18,237
2000 modern 199 #18,278
2001 modern 196 #18,146
2002 modern 198 #18,410
2003 modern 185 #18,999
2004 modern 181 #19,363
2005 modern 182 #19,259
2006 modern 177 #19,738
2007 modern 169 #20,562
2008 modern 171 #20,595
2009 modern 174 #20,782
2010 modern 177 #21,034
2011 modern 172 #21,248
2012 modern 165 #21,782
2013 modern 174 #21,401
2014 modern 171 #21,812
2015 modern 173 #21,542
2016 modern 166 #22,140

Geography

Back to top

Where Throps are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Birstall, Bradford and Halifax. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to West Oxfordshire, Bradford, Isle of Wight, Suffolk Coastal and Leeds. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 2
2 Birstall Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Bradford Yorkshire, West Riding
4 Halifax Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 West Oxfordshire 007 West Oxfordshire
2 Bradford 002 Bradford
3 Isle of Wight 005 Isle of Wight
4 Suffolk Coastal 005 Suffolk Coastal
5 Leeds 028 Leeds

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Throp

These lists show first names that appear often with the Throp surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Throp

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Throp, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Throp surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Throp household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Throp is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Throp is most concentrated in decile 1 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

1
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Throp falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Throp is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 40-50 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

7
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Throp, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Throp families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Throp surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 172 Throps recorded in 1881 and an index of 7.87x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 172 7.87x
Lancashire 23 0.88x
Middlesex 13 0.59x
Durham 7 1.07x
Kent 4 0.53x
Cheshire 2 0.41x
Gloucestershire 2 0.46x
Hertfordshire 1 0.66x
Staffordshire 1 0.13x
Wiltshire 1 0.51x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bowling in Yorkshire leads with 25 Throps recorded in 1881 and an index of 115.53x.

Place Total Index
Bowling 25 115.53x
Horton In Bradford 23 67.43x
Halifax 22 68.60x
Tong 16 379.15x
Leeds 15 12.16x
Horwich 13 456.14x
Gomersal 12 117.65x
Pudsey 9 77.05x
Bethnal Green London 7 7.31x
Hunslet 7 20.55x
North Bierley 7 59.37x
Bradford 5 9.46x
Gateshead 5 10.18x
Shoreditch London 5 5.23x
Ecclesall Bierlow 4 9.00x
Holbeck 4 27.64x
Lewisham 4 9.97x
Northowram 4 26.11x
Royton 4 50.00x
Skircoat 4 46.46x
Southowram 4 59.97x
Birkdale 3 45.32x
Manchester 3 2.55x
Tanshelf 3 172.41x
Bristol St James St Paul 2 13.87x
Knutsford Nether 2 68.03x
Manningham 2 7.43x
Oulton Cum Woodlesford 2 112.99x
Sedgefield 2 85.47x
Wakefield 2 11.93x
Appleton Roebuck 1 303.03x
Berkhampstead 1 29.24x
Burslem 1 4.69x
Kensington London 1 0.82x
Sheffield 1 1.44x
Winterbourne Earls 1 555.56x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Throp surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 16
Elizabeth 14
Jane 7
Martha 6
Mary 6
Ann 5
Caroline 3
Clara 3
Eliza 3
Hannah 3
Agnes 2
Alice 2
Annie 2
Betty 2
Emma 2
Florence 2
Harriet 2
Harriot 2
Louisa 2
Minnie 2
Ruth 2
Anne 1
Beatrice 1
Blanch 1
Cicely 1
Edith 1
Elizth 1
Ellen 1
Emilia 1
Emillin 1
Emily 1
Faith 1
Hellen 1
Julia 1
Leonora 1
Liley 1
Lilley 1
Lillie 1
Lily 1
Louise 1
Maggie 1
Margaret 1
Maria 1
Nora 1
Paulina 1
Polly 1
Rose 1
Susanna 1
Thamar 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Throp surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 16
James 10
Thomas 8
George 7
Charles 6
Joseph 6
Richard 6
William 5
Benjamin 4
Alfred 3
Albert 2
Ben 2
Harry 2
Robert 2
Abraham 1
Andrew 1
Archie 1
Arthur 1
Benjiman 1
David 1
Edgar 1
Edmond 1
Eli 1
Ernest 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
G.E. 1
Granville 1
Harold 1
Hartley 1
Henry 1
Hy.Tate 1
Jonas 1
Mark 1
Nathaniel 1
Percy 1
Ralph 1
Sam 1
Samuel 1
Smithies 1
Syney 1
Thos. 1
W. 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Throp surname: questions and answers

How common was the Throp surname in 1881?

In 1881, 226 people were recorded with the Throp surname. That placed it at #11,889 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Throp surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 166 in 2016. That gives Throp a modern rank of #22,140.

What does the Throp map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Throp bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.