NameCensus.

UK surname

Toseland

In the 1881 census there were 283 people recorded with the Toseland surname, ranking it #10,119 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 527, ranked #9,622, up from #10,119 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, Burton Latimer and Northampton St Giles, Northampton St Sepulchre, Northampton Priory. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Kettering, Amber Valley and Daventry.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Toseland is 575 in 1998. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 86.2%.

1881 census count

283

Ranked #10,119

Modern count

527

2016, ranked #9,622

Peak year

1998

575 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Toseland had 283 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #10,119 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 527 in 2016, ranked #9,622.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 456 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Toseland surname distribution map

The map shows where the Toseland surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Toseland surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Toseland over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 118 #15,362
1861 historical 126 #17,569
1881 historical 283 #10,119
1891 historical 301 #11,092
1901 historical 454 #8,657
1911 historical 456 #8,409
1997 modern 571 #8,435
1998 modern 575 #8,622
1999 modern 569 #8,746
2000 modern 569 #8,709
2001 modern 560 #8,684
2002 modern 550 #8,981
2003 modern 520 #9,233
2004 modern 539 #8,991
2005 modern 547 #8,819
2006 modern 531 #9,063
2007 modern 534 #9,102
2008 modern 539 #9,098
2009 modern 554 #9,117
2010 modern 564 #9,185
2011 modern 566 #9,070
2012 modern 547 #9,203
2013 modern 558 #9,223
2014 modern 544 #9,476
2015 modern 532 #9,567
2016 modern 527 #9,622

Geography

Back to top

Where Toselands are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, Burton Latimer, Northampton St Giles, Northampton St Sepulchre, Northampton Priory, Naseby and Kettering. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Kettering, Amber Valley and Daventry. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
2 Burton Latimer Northamptonshire
3 Northampton St Giles, Northampton St Sepulchre, Northampton Priory Northamptonshire
4 Naseby Northamptonshire
5 Kettering Northamptonshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Kettering 001 Kettering
2 Kettering 004 Kettering
3 Kettering 011 Kettering
4 Amber Valley 004 Amber Valley
5 Daventry 002 Daventry

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Toseland

These lists show first names that appear often with the Toseland surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Toseland

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Toseland, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Toseland surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Toseland household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

Senior Professionals

Within London, Toseland is most associated with areas classed as Senior Professionals, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These very central neighbourhoods house residents whose ages are more skewed towards older age cohorts than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Few households have young children. Rates of illness are low. Indian ethnicity is rare compared to the Supergroup mean. Property under occupation is more common, despite the centrality of neighbourhoods, and more residents live in communal establishments than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Toseland is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Toseland falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Toseland is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Toseland, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Toseland families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Toseland surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Northamptonshire leads with 163 Toselands recorded in 1881 and an index of 62.78x.

County Total Index
Northamptonshire 163 62.78x
Huntingdonshire 29 52.91x
Derbyshire 20 4.63x
Nottinghamshire 14 3.76x
Cambridgeshire 12 6.86x
Middlesex 12 0.43x
Leicestershire 11 3.59x
Yorkshire 8 0.29x
Lincolnshire 5 1.13x
Bedfordshire 3 2.10x
Devon 1 0.17x
Essex 1 0.18x
Monmouthshire 1 0.50x
Rutland 1 4.93x
Warwickshire 1 0.14x
Worcestershire 1 0.28x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Kettering in Northamptonshire leads with 75 Toselands recorded in 1881 and an index of 714.29x.

Place Total Index
Kettering 75 714.29x
Grafton Underwood 25 9615.38x
Godmanchester 24 1159.42x
Naseby 14 2413.79x
Nottingham St Mary 14 14.55x
Whittington 12 200.67x
Little Harrowden 10 1282.05x
Broughton 9 1084.34x
Papworth St Agnes 9 6428.57x
Attercliffe Cum Darnall 8 31.40x
Burton Latimer 8 509.55x
Mile End Old Town 8 18.36x
Barkby 5 833.33x
Great Bowden 5 179.86x
Staveley 5 65.19x
Warkton 5 2000.00x
Weston 5 625.00x
Bow London 3 8.54x
Brixworth 3 270.27x
Dodford 3 1500.00x
Old 3 882.35x
Toddington 3 146.34x
Unstone 3 176.47x
Easton 2 1428.57x
Huntingdon St John 2 125.79x
St Giles Cambridge 2 88.50x
Brigstock 1 101.01x
Claines 1 10.11x
Coventry Holy Trinity 1 4.81x
Cranford St Andrew 1 526.32x
Draughton 1 666.67x
Geddington 1 119.05x
Great Harrowden 1 666.67x
Harlow 1 42.55x
Leicester St Margaret 1 1.34x
Newport 1 10.50x
Northampton All Sts 1 11.35x
Northampton St Sepulchre 1 7.57x
Oakham Lordshold 1 47.17x
Spaldwick 1 294.12x
St Benedict Cambridge 1 101.01x
Tormoham 1 4.11x
Weekley 1 434.78x
Willesden 1 3.84x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Toseland surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Toseland surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Toseland surname: questions and answers

How common was the Toseland surname in 1881?

In 1881, 283 people were recorded with the Toseland surname. That placed it at #10,119 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Toseland surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 527 in 2016. That gives Toseland a modern rank of #9,622.

What does the Toseland map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Toseland bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.