NameCensus.

UK surname

Blanchflower

In the 1881 census there were 218 people recorded with the Blanchflower surname, ranking it #12,158 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 233, ranked #17,625, down from #12,158 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to St George Tombland, St Peter Mountergate, St John Timberhill, All Saints, St Michael at Thorn, St Ju, London parishes and King's Lynn St Margaret. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include South Norfolk and Norwich.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Blanchflower is 299 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 6.9%.

1881 census count

218

Ranked #12,158

Modern count

233

2016, ranked #17,625

Peak year

1999

299 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Blanchflower had 218 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #12,158 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 233 in 2016, ranked #17,625.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 275 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Blanchflower surname distribution map

The map shows where the Blanchflower surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Blanchflower surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Blanchflower over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 101 #17,036
1861 historical 168 #13,895
1881 historical 218 #12,158
1891 historical 229 #13,539
1901 historical 275 #12,332
1911 historical 265 #12,422
1997 modern 292 #13,765
1998 modern 290 #14,179
1999 modern 299 #14,000
2000 modern 273 #14,828
2001 modern 270 #14,734
2002 modern 285 #14,483
2003 modern 262 #15,150
2004 modern 263 #15,189
2005 modern 253 #15,514
2006 modern 251 #15,696
2007 modern 252 #15,815
2008 modern 260 #15,648
2009 modern 265 #15,756
2010 modern 267 #16,029
2011 modern 258 #16,284
2012 modern 247 #16,661
2013 modern 249 #16,825
2014 modern 247 #17,035
2015 modern 240 #17,279
2016 modern 233 #17,625

Geography

Back to top

Where Blanchflowers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around St George Tombland, St Peter Mountergate, St John Timberhill, All Saints, St Michael at Thorn, St Ju, London parishes, King's Lynn St Margaret, Swaffham and Marham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to South Norfolk and Norwich. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 St George Tombland, St Peter Mountergate, St John Timberhill, All Saints, St Michael at Thorn, St Ju Norfolk
2 London parishes London 3
3 King's Lynn St Margaret Norfolk
4 Swaffham Norfolk
5 Marham Norfolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 South Norfolk 007 South Norfolk
2 Norwich 002 Norwich
3 Norwich 005 Norwich
4 Norwich 004 Norwich
5 South Norfolk 005 South Norfolk

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Blanchflower

These lists show first names that appear often with the Blanchflower surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Blanchflower

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Blanchflower, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Blanchflower surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Blanchflower household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Blanchflower is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Blanchflower is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Blanchflower falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Blanchflower is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Blanchflower, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Blanchflower families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Blanchflower surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 89 Blanchflowers recorded in 1881 and an index of 27.22x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 89 27.22x
Lancashire 36 1.43x
Middlesex 25 1.18x
Surrey 11 1.06x
Yorkshire 10 0.47x
Lanarkshire 9 1.31x
Durham 8 1.26x
Cambridgeshire 6 4.45x
Suffolk 6 2.32x
Kent 5 0.69x
Cheshire 4 0.85x
Northumberland 3 0.95x
Warwickshire 3 0.56x
Bedfordshire 1 0.91x
Devon 1 0.23x
Sussex 1 0.28x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Islington London in Middlesex leads with 15 Blanchflowers recorded in 1881 and an index of 7.28x.

Place Total Index
Islington London 15 7.28x
Great Yarmouth 14 51.70x
Norwich St Michael At 11 578.95x
Ashton Under Lyne 10 18.13x
Bethnal Green London 9 9.74x
Govan 9 5.29x
Merton 7 5833.33x
Streatham 7 44.36x
Walton Le Dale 7 103.24x
Kings Lynn St Margaret 6 61.10x
Marham 6 1090.91x
Ormesby St Margaret W 6 731.71x
Salford 6 8.09x
Stow Bedon 6 2500.00x
Wimblington 6 759.49x
Doncaster 5 32.47x
Gillingham 5 33.42x
Hempton 5 1219.51x
Little Bolton 5 15.41x
Chester Le Street 4 82.30x
Dukinfield 4 18.44x
Heigham 4 22.79x
North Meols 4 16.19x
Tyldesley Cum Shakerley 4 55.10x
Byker 3 19.18x
Holy Trinity 3 5.92x
Kirkley 3 138.25x
Reedham 3 476.19x
Swaffham 3 112.78x
Watton 3 291.26x
Forncett St Mary 2 1000.00x
Gorleston 2 30.40x
Lambeth 2 1.08x
Monkwearmouth Shore 2 16.19x
Narborough 2 625.00x
Newton Biggin 2 1111.11x
Pentney 2 512.82x
Attleborough 1 60.61x
Bampton 1 73.53x
Bedford St Paul 1 13.25x
Birmingham 1 0.56x
Brightside Bierlow 1 2.42x
Broadwater 1 12.17x
Cranworth 1 588.24x
East Dereham 1 24.21x
Fakenham 1 62.11x
Framlingham 1 54.35x
Gately 1 909.09x
Hampstead London 1 3.02x
Knapton 1 434.78x
Middleton 1 156.25x
Norwich St John Sepulchre 1 47.17x
Penge 1 7.36x
Penshaw 1 52.63x
Rollesby 1 243.90x
Rotherhithe 1 3.81x
Southcoates 1 8.55x
Westoe 1 2.79x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Blanchflower surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 12
Mary 10
Elizabeth 8
Ann 5
Maria 4
Alice 3
Elizth. 3
Emma 3
Florence 3
Isabella 3
Susan 3
A. 2
Anna 2
Eva 2
Hannah 2
Laura 2
Margaret 2
Amelia 1
Annie 1
Blanche 1
Catherine 1
Edith 1
Emily 1
Ethel 1
Fanny 1
Frances 1
Georgeanna 1
Gertrude 1
Harriet 1
Harriett 1
Jane 1
Kager 1
Katherine 1
Lilian 1
Louisa 1
Marianne 1
Martha 1
Maud 1
Rebecca 1
Selina 1
Susanna 1
Violet 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Blanchflower surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 19
John 15
James 9
Albert 5
Arthur 5
Edward 4
George 4
Henry 4
Ernest 3
Robert 3
Thomas 3
Alfred 2
Edwin 2
Joseph 2
Leonard 2
Abraham 1
Alice 1
Arnold 1
Benjamin 1
Carrington 1
Charles 1
Dennis 1
E. 1
Edgar 1
Elijah 1
Elizabeth 1
Fenton 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Frederic 1
Frederick 1
Fredk. 1
H. 1
Harry 1
Jacob 1
Jonas 1
Oswald 1
Percy 1
Sam 1
Samuel 1
Stephen 1
Thos. 1
Timothy 1
Timy.H. 1
Turner 1
Walter 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Blanchflower surname: questions and answers

How common was the Blanchflower surname in 1881?

In 1881, 218 people were recorded with the Blanchflower surname. That placed it at #12,158 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Blanchflower surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 233 in 2016. That gives Blanchflower a modern rank of #17,625.

What does the Blanchflower map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Blanchflower bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.