NameCensus.

UK surname

Brandish

In the 1881 census there were 47 people recorded with the Brandish surname, ranking it #27,019 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 163, ranked #22,407, up from #27,019 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to No data. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Norwich, Oxford and Broadland.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Brandish is 163 in 2015. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 246.8%.

1881 census count

47

Ranked #27,019

Modern count

163

2016, ranked #22,407

Peak year

2015

163 bearers

Map years

3

1998 to 2016

Key insights

  • Brandish had 47 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #27,019 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 163 in 2016, ranked #22,407.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 71 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Brandish surname distribution map

The map shows where the Brandish surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Brandish surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Brandish over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 34 #27,194
1861 historical 53 #27,253
1881 historical 47 #27,019
1891 historical 55 #29,744
1901 historical 62 #27,252
1911 historical 71 #25,742
1997 modern 119 #24,302
1998 modern 149 #21,755
1999 modern 152 #21,636
2000 modern 147 #22,081
2001 modern 145 #21,951
2002 modern 153 #21,609
2003 modern 152 #21,486
2004 modern 148 #22,000
2005 modern 137 #23,110
2006 modern 143 #22,619
2007 modern 143 #22,924
2008 modern 150 #22,429
2009 modern 156 #22,351
2010 modern 152 #23,282
2011 modern 147 #23,627
2012 modern 156 #22,645
2013 modern 162 #22,433
2014 modern 162 #22,624
2015 modern 163 #22,407
2016 modern 163 #22,407

Geography

Back to top

Where Brandishs are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around No data. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Norwich, Oxford and Broadland. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 No data No data

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Norwich 005 Norwich
2 Oxford 016 Oxford
3 Norwich 001 Norwich
4 Broadland 006 Broadland
5 Norwich 004 Norwich

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Brandish

These lists show first names that appear often with the Brandish surname in historical and recent records.

Historical female names

No Forenames Found

Historical male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Brandish

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Brandish, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Brandish surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Brandish household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Brandish is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Brandish is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Brandish falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Brandish is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Brandish, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Brandish families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Brandish surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Warwickshire leads with 21 Brandishs recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.17x.

County Total Index
Warwickshire 21 18.17x
Lancashire 11 2.02x
Norfolk 5 7.09x
Derbyshire 3 4.18x
Hampshire 2 2.13x
Oxfordshire 2 7.06x
Middlesex 1 0.22x
Suffolk 1 1.79x
Yorkshire 1 0.22x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Pendleton In Salford in Lancashire leads with 7 Brandishs recorded in 1881 and an index of 108.02x.

Place Total Index
Pendleton In Salford 7 108.02x
Foleshill 5 409.84x
Bedworth 4 476.19x
Butlers Marston 4 10000.00x
Exhall 4 2222.22x
Little Compton 4 5000.00x
Norwich St Mary At Coslany 4 2000.00x
Salford 4 25.00x
Chastleton 2 6666.67x
Derby St Peter 2 87.34x
Alverstoke 1 29.41x
Fordingbridge 1 196.08x
Heigham 1 26.46x
Lowestoft 1 37.88x
Newbold Dunston 1 147.06x
Teddington London 1 96.15x
York Marygate St Olave 1 588.24x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Brandish surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 4
Ann 2
Annie 2
Agatha 1
Alice 1
Anna 1
Caroline 1
Drusilla 1
Eliza 1
Ellen 1
Frances 1
Lillie 1
Louisa 1
Lousia 1
Lucy 1
Maria 1
Mary 1
Sarah 1
Sophia 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Brandish surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 5
George 4
James 3
William 3
Chas. 1
Edwin 1
Hugh 1
Joseph 1
Robert 1
Samuel 1
Thos.Henry 1
Walter 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Brandish households.

FAQ

Brandish surname: questions and answers

How common was the Brandish surname in 1881?

In 1881, 47 people were recorded with the Brandish surname. That placed it at #27,019 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Brandish surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 163 in 2016. That gives Brandish a modern rank of #22,407.

What does the Brandish map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Brandish bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.