NameCensus.

UK surname

Cranstone

In the 1881 census there were 189 people recorded with the Cranstone surname, ranking it #13,322 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 215, ranked #18,670, down from #13,322 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Godalming, Crondall and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Hart and Guildford.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Cranstone is 276 in 1901. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 13.8%.

1881 census count

189

Ranked #13,322

Modern count

215

2016, ranked #18,670

Peak year

1901

276 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Cranstone had 189 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,322 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 215 in 2016, ranked #18,670.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 276 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established Mature Families.

Cranstone surname distribution map

The map shows where the Cranstone surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Cranstone surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Cranstone over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 169 #11,832
1861 historical 126 #17,569
1881 historical 189 #13,322
1891 historical 242 #13,048
1901 historical 276 #12,315
1911 historical 253 #12,776
1997 modern 245 #15,483
1998 modern 249 #15,720
1999 modern 246 #15,974
2000 modern 251 #15,692
2001 modern 240 #15,912
2002 modern 240 #16,291
2003 modern 228 #16,663
2004 modern 220 #17,129
2005 modern 199 #18,198
2006 modern 192 #18,753
2007 modern 198 #18,600
2008 modern 194 #19,011
2009 modern 199 #19,090
2010 modern 200 #19,457
2011 modern 213 #18,502
2012 modern 223 #17,852
2013 modern 226 #17,969
2014 modern 221 #18,412
2015 modern 217 #18,542
2016 modern 215 #18,670

Geography

Back to top

Where Cranstones are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Godalming, Crondall, London parishes and Farnham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Hart and Guildford. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Godalming Surrey
2 Crondall Hampshire
3 London parishes London 1
4 London parishes London 3
5 Farnham Surrey

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Hart 010 Hart
2 Hart 003 Hart
3 Guildford 010 Guildford
4 Hart 005 Hart
5 Hart 009 Hart

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Cranstone

These lists show first names that appear often with the Cranstone surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Cranstone

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Cranstone, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Established Mature Families

Nationally, the Cranstone surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established Mature Families, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Cranstone household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Married couples predominate, many with older dependent children. Detached housing is common. Homeownership rates are the highest within this Supergroup. The presence of some students suggests that households are towards the end of a child rearing phase. Many residents have degree level qualifications, and the occupational profile is heavily skewed towards managerial and professional occupations. Residential developments commonly occur on the periphery of major urban cities or conurbations.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Cranstone is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Cranstone is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Cranstone falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Cranstone is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Cranstone, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Cranstone families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Cranstone surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Hampshire leads with 63 Cranstones recorded in 1881 and an index of 16.76x.

County Total Index
Hampshire 63 16.76x
Surrey 31 3.47x
Middlesex 20 1.09x
Durham 19 3.48x
Sussex 14 4.53x
Hertfordshire 12 9.49x
Huntingdonshire 5 13.73x
Essex 4 1.11x
Cumberland 3 1.90x
Lanarkshire 3 0.51x
Derbyshire 2 0.70x
Nottinghamshire 2 0.81x
Somerset 2 0.68x
Yorkshire 2 0.11x
Gloucestershire 1 0.28x
Lancashire 1 0.05x
Midlothian 1 0.41x
Montgomeryshire 1 2.38x
Peeblesshire 1 11.59x
Roxburghshire 1 3.01x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Crondall in Hampshire leads with 37 Cranstones recorded in 1881 and an index of 1831.68x.

Place Total Index
Crondall 37 1831.68x
Aldershot 10 79.43x
Farnham 10 143.88x
Camberwell 9 7.68x
Hemel Hempstead 9 157.89x
Billingshurst 8 792.08x
Alton 7 247.35x
Collierley 7 288.07x
Crook Billy Row 6 85.84x
Edmonton 6 40.62x
Godalming 6 106.76x
Chertsey 5 86.66x
Isleworth 5 61.35x
St Neots 5 252.53x
Binsted 4 279.72x
Gateshead 4 9.79x
Portsea 4 5.43x
Tottenham 4 13.69x
Brighton 3 4.81x
Farlam 3 303.03x
Hertford St Andrew 3 192.31x
Islington London 3 1.69x
Ackworth 2 142.86x
Carnwath 2 54.50x
Dunster 2 281.69x
Ferring 2 1333.33x
Great Clacton 2 162.60x
Nuthall 2 215.05x
Tanfield 2 30.82x
Angmering 1 161.29x
Bristol St James In 1 18.90x
Broughton 1 714.29x
Derby St Peter 1 10.94x
Duddingston 1 20.28x
Glasgow 1 0.95x
Grays Thurrock 1 29.76x
Hammersmith London 1 2.21x
Hampstead London 1 3.50x
Kingsley 1 344.83x
Kingston On Thames 1 4.66x
Pool 1 31.55x
Preston 1 1.72x
Southdean 1 217.39x
West Ham 1 1.25x
Winshill 1 54.64x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Cranstone surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Cranstone surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 19
James 12
George 7
Thomas 5
Charles 4
John 4
Richard 3
Robert 3
Alfred 2
Edmund 2
Harry 2
Henry 2
Jesse 2
Samuel 2
Arthur 1
David 1
Edwd. 1
Edwin 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Frederic 1
Geo. 1
Irvin 1
Isaac 1
Jhon 1
Job 1
Joseph 1
Lefevre 1
Michael 1
Nelson 1
Noah 1
Owen 1
Roland 1
Walter 1
Willm. 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Cranstone surname: questions and answers

How common was the Cranstone surname in 1881?

In 1881, 189 people were recorded with the Cranstone surname. That placed it at #13,322 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Cranstone surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 215 in 2016. That gives Cranstone a modern rank of #18,670.

What does the Cranstone map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Cranstone bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.