NameCensus.

UK surname

Cuckow

In the 1881 census there were 150 people recorded with the Cuckow surname, ranking it #15,489 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 178, ranked #21,160, down from #15,489 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hoo or St Werburgh, London parishes and Dartford. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Maidstone, Ipswich and Portsmouth.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Cuckow is 253 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 18.7%.

1881 census count

150

Ranked #15,489

Modern count

178

2016, ranked #21,160

Peak year

1911

253 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Cuckow had 150 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,489 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 178 in 2016, ranked #21,160.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 253 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Cuckow surname distribution map

The map shows where the Cuckow surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Cuckow surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Cuckow over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 121 #15,049
1861 historical 104 #20,477
1881 historical 150 #15,489
1891 historical 188 #15,609
1901 historical 245 #13,298
1911 historical 253 #12,776
1997 modern 203 #17,457
1998 modern 208 #17,693
1999 modern 205 #17,960
2000 modern 211 #17,603
2001 modern 204 #17,736
2002 modern 209 #17,803
2003 modern 203 #17,967
2004 modern 196 #18,438
2005 modern 175 #19,727
2006 modern 181 #19,466
2007 modern 186 #19,337
2008 modern 184 #19,666
2009 modern 178 #20,486
2010 modern 184 #20,521
2011 modern 189 #19,997
2012 modern 186 #20,141
2013 modern 193 #19,997
2014 modern 186 #20,664
2015 modern 180 #20,997
2016 modern 178 #21,160

Geography

Back to top

Where Cuckows are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hoo or St Werburgh, London parishes, Dartford, Ipswich St Clement and Warren House and Maidstone, Linton, Loddington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Maidstone, Ipswich and Portsmouth. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hoo or St Werburgh Kent
2 London parishes London 3
3 Dartford Kent
4 Ipswich St Clement and Warren House Suffolk
5 Maidstone, Linton, Loddington Kent

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Maidstone 017 Maidstone
2 Maidstone 011 Maidstone
3 Ipswich 010 Ipswich
4 Portsmouth 024 Portsmouth
5 Ipswich 015 Ipswich

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Cuckow

These lists show first names that appear often with the Cuckow surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Cuckow

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Cuckow, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Cuckow surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Cuckow household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Cuckow is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Cuckow is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Cuckow falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Cuckow is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Cuckow, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Cuckow families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Cuckow surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 115 Cuckows recorded in 1881 and an index of 22.88x.

County Total Index
Kent 115 22.88x
Suffolk 17 9.48x
Middlesex 8 0.54x
Surrey 4 0.56x
Warwickshire 4 1.08x
Sussex 3 1.21x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Gillingham in Kent leads with 22 Cuckows recorded in 1881 and an index of 212.36x.

Place Total Index
Gillingham 22 212.36x
Strood 14 487.80x
Ashford 10 204.50x
Dartford 9 175.10x
Ipswich St Peter 8 330.58x
Maidstone 7 46.76x
Deptford St Paul 6 15.48x
Grange Gillingham 6 2727.27x
Lenham 6 600.00x
Stone In Dartford 6 465.12x
Boxley 5 649.35x
Frindsbury 5 264.55x
Harrietsham 5 1470.59x
St Mary Le Strand London 5 925.93x
Birmingham 4 3.23x
Croydon 4 10.04x
Erith 4 80.81x
Cliffe 3 357.14x
Ipswich St Mary Key 3 638.30x
Walton 3 468.75x
Faversham 2 41.75x
Rochester St Margaret 2 37.74x
Beccles 1 34.60x
Boughton Malherbe 1 454.55x
Chatham 1 7.23x
Ealing 1 7.60x
Ipswich St Clement 1 21.93x
Ipswich St Margaret 1 16.42x
Kennington 1 270.27x
Marden 1 84.75x
Plumstead 1 5.97x
St Margaret Pattens 1 3333.33x
St Marylebone London 1 1.27x
Swanscombe 1 44.25x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Cuckow surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Cuckow surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 11
George 9
William 9
Edward 5
Walter 5
Alfred 4
Charles 4
Edwin 3
Robert 3
Albert 2
Arthur 2
Frederick 2
Fredrick 2
Thomas 2
Chas. 1
Edgar 1
Erwin 1
Geo.Edwd. 1
Henry 1
James 1
Richard 1
Sidney 1

FAQ

Cuckow surname: questions and answers

How common was the Cuckow surname in 1881?

In 1881, 150 people were recorded with the Cuckow surname. That placed it at #15,489 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Cuckow surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 178 in 2016. That gives Cuckow a modern rank of #21,160.

What does the Cuckow map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Cuckow bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.