NameCensus.

UK surname

Deeprose

In the 1881 census there were 147 people recorded with the Deeprose surname, ranking it #15,674 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 369, ranked #12,617, up from #15,674 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hastings St Mary-in-the-Castle, Hastings St Andrew, London parishes and Ashburnham, Dallington, Brightling, Ninfield. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Hastings and Rother.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Deeprose is 404 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 151.0%.

1881 census count

147

Ranked #15,674

Modern count

369

2016, ranked #12,617

Peak year

2010

404 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Deeprose had 147 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #15,674 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 369 in 2016, ranked #12,617.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 242 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities.

Deeprose surname distribution map

The map shows where the Deeprose surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Deeprose surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Deeprose over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 48 #24,615
1861 historical 70 #24,911
1881 historical 147 #15,674
1891 historical 148 #18,506
1901 historical 213 #14,563
1911 historical 242 #13,193
1997 modern 399 #11,028
1998 modern 398 #11,377
1999 modern 398 #11,486
2000 modern 393 #11,540
2001 modern 384 #11,565
2002 modern 387 #11,713
2003 modern 381 #11,667
2004 modern 389 #11,516
2005 modern 390 #11,397
2006 modern 391 #11,432
2007 modern 388 #11,630
2008 modern 384 #11,851
2009 modern 392 #11,908
2010 modern 404 #11,902
2011 modern 401 #11,843
2012 modern 381 #12,152
2013 modern 384 #12,295
2014 modern 380 #12,449
2015 modern 376 #12,446
2016 modern 369 #12,617

Geography

Back to top

Where Deeproses are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hastings St Mary-in-the-Castle, Hastings St Andrew, London parishes, Ashburnham, Dallington, Brightling, Ninfield, Hooe and Glasgow. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Hastings and Rother. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hastings St Mary-in-the-Castle, Hastings St Andrew Sussex
2 London parishes London 3
3 Ashburnham, Dallington, Brightling, Ninfield Sussex
4 Hooe Sussex
5 Glasgow Lanark

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Hastings 003 Hastings
2 Rother 007 Rother
3 Rother 011 Rother
4 Hastings 007 Hastings
5 Rother 010 Rother

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Deeprose

These lists show first names that appear often with the Deeprose surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Deeprose

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Deeprose, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities

Nationally, the Deeprose surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Legacy Industrial and Coastal Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Deeprose household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Single-person households are common in these neighbourhoods, and these residents are typically divorced rather than never married. A high proportion of residents were born outside the UK in the EU. There are many young adults, some with young children, but relatively few residents are of normal retirement age or over. Although levels of identification with ethnic minorities are in line with the Supergroup average, individuals identifying with Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is more common than average. High long-term disability rates are observed, and unpaid care is more common than in the rest of the Group. The predominant housing types are terraced houses and flats, which are typically part of the social rented sector. This Group is commonly found in coastal areas and (present-day or former) industrial towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Deeprose is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Deeprose is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Deeprose falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Deeprose is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 25-30 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

5
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Deeprose, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Deeprose families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Deeprose surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Sussex leads with 108 Deeproses recorded in 1881 and an index of 44.68x.

County Total Index
Sussex 108 44.68x
Lanarkshire 13 2.80x
Middlesex 9 0.63x
Surrey 7 1.00x
Kent 6 1.23x
Yorkshire 3 0.21x
Hampshire 1 0.34x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Hastings St Andrew in Sussex leads with 23 Deeproses recorded in 1881 and an index of 2643.68x.

Place Total Index
Hastings St Andrew 23 2643.68x
Barony 13 11.08x
Hastings All Sts 13 570.18x
Bexhill 12 1000.00x
Hooe 10 4347.83x
Catsfield 8 2285.71x
Hastings St Mary In The 8 155.04x
Bermondsey 7 16.40x
Brighton 7 14.35x
Ninfield 7 2333.33x
Strood 6 215.05x
Rotherfield 5 234.74x
Ashburnham 4 1052.63x
Hastings St Mary 4 66.45x
Tottenham 4 17.51x
Featherstone 3 187.50x
Westminster St Margaret 3 43.35x
Chailey 2 266.67x
Fulham London 2 9.62x
Ore 2 111.11x
Hastings St Leonards 1 28.17x
Hordle 1 196.08x
Lewes St John Southover 1 61.73x
Wadhurst 1 62.89x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Deeprose surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Deeprose surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 11
George 8
Henry 7
John 7
James 5
Joseph 4
Thomas 4
Arthur 3
Albert 2
Alfred 2
Charles 2
David 2
Frank 2
Frederick 2
Herbert 2
Jesse 2
Rufus 2
Caleb 1
Ebeneezer 1
Ebenezer 1
Ernest 1
Fred 1
Harry 1
Morr 1
Obedia 1
Percy 1
Phinchas 1
Willie 1

FAQ

Deeprose surname: questions and answers

How common was the Deeprose surname in 1881?

In 1881, 147 people were recorded with the Deeprose surname. That placed it at #15,674 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Deeprose surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 369 in 2016. That gives Deeprose a modern rank of #12,617.

What does the Deeprose map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Deeprose bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.