NameCensus.

UK surname

Dyble

In the 1881 census there were 161 people recorded with the Dyble surname, ranking it #14,801 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 364, ranked #12,748, up from #14,801 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Hemsby, Northfleet and Caistor next Yarmouth. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Great Yarmouth and Broadland.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Dyble is 403 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 126.1%.

1881 census count

161

Ranked #14,801

Modern count

364

2016, ranked #12,748

Peak year

1999

403 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Dyble had 161 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,801 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 364 in 2016, ranked #12,748.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 379 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Dyble surname distribution map

The map shows where the Dyble surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Dyble surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Dyble over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 74 #20,443
1861 historical 81 #23,431
1881 historical 161 #14,801
1891 historical 225 #13,714
1901 historical 272 #12,440
1911 historical 379 #9,672
1997 modern 367 #11,751
1998 modern 402 #11,295
1999 modern 403 #11,382
2000 modern 384 #11,759
2001 modern 389 #11,439
2002 modern 389 #11,667
2003 modern 371 #11,901
2004 modern 372 #11,886
2005 modern 359 #12,143
2006 modern 346 #12,539
2007 modern 354 #12,489
2008 modern 357 #12,509
2009 modern 362 #12,637
2010 modern 358 #13,001
2011 modern 351 #13,059
2012 modern 345 #13,093
2013 modern 370 #12,626
2014 modern 371 #12,689
2015 modern 363 #12,793
2016 modern 364 #12,748

Geography

Back to top

Where Dybles are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Hemsby, Northfleet, Caistor next Yarmouth, London parishes and King's Lynn St Margaret. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Great Yarmouth and Broadland. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Hemsby Norfolk
2 Northfleet Kent
3 Caistor next Yarmouth Norfolk
4 London parishes London 3
5 King's Lynn St Margaret Norfolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Great Yarmouth 001 Great Yarmouth
2 Great Yarmouth 003 Great Yarmouth
3 Great Yarmouth 002 Great Yarmouth
4 Great Yarmouth 004 Great Yarmouth
5 Broadland 004 Broadland

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Dyble

These lists show first names that appear often with the Dyble surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Dyble

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Dyble, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Dyble surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Dyble household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

Senior Professionals

Within London, Dyble is most associated with areas classed as Senior Professionals, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These very central neighbourhoods house residents whose ages are more skewed towards older age cohorts than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Few households have young children. Rates of illness are low. Indian ethnicity is rare compared to the Supergroup mean. Property under occupation is more common, despite the centrality of neighbourhoods, and more residents live in communal establishments than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Dyble is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Dyble falls in decile 4 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

4
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Dyble is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Dyble, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Dyble families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Dyble surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 84 Dybles recorded in 1881 and an index of 34.79x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 84 34.79x
Middlesex 18 1.15x
Kent 14 2.61x
Yorkshire 9 0.58x
Hampshire 7 2.17x
Northumberland 7 3.00x
Suffolk 7 3.66x
Cheshire 6 1.73x
Devon 6 1.84x
Berkshire 2 1.70x
Bedfordshire 1 1.23x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Ormesby St Margaret W in Norfolk leads with 30 Dybles recorded in 1881 and an index of 4918.03x.

Place Total Index
Ormesby St Margaret W 30 4918.03x
Anmer 17 18888.89x
Kings Lynn St Margaret 10 137.93x
St Pancras London 8 6.33x
Bury St Edmunds St James 7 136.99x
Northfleet 7 148.31x
Gaywood 6 1395.35x
Knutsford Nether 6 285.71x
Mautby 6 7500.00x
Swanscombe 6 248.96x
Withycombe Rawleigh 6 352.94x
Burgh St Margaret 5 1666.67x
Kilham 5 769.23x
Fenham 4 5000.00x
Islington London 4 2.63x
Alverstoke 3 25.75x
Rollesby 3 1000.00x
Titchfield 3 123.46x
Tynemouth 3 23.98x
Clewer 2 41.41x
Great Yarmouth 2 10.00x
Hornsey 2 10.07x
South Lynn 2 73.26x
St Bride London 2 219.78x
Bedford St Paul 1 17.92x
Eaton St Andrew 1 149.25x
Flamborough 1 133.33x
Nafferton 1 151.52x
Runham 1 208.33x
Southampton 1 400.00x
St Mary Le Strand London 1 175.44x
St Marylebone London 1 1.19x
Warter 1 303.03x
Westacre 1 454.55x
Whitwood 1 45.25x
Woolwich 1 5.05x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Dyble surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 8
Eliza 6
Emma 6
Harriet 5
Alice 4
Edith 4
Elizabeth 4
Sarah 4
Ann 3
Ellen 3
Maria 3
Ethel 2
Abigal 1
Agnes 1
Agness 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Caroline 1
Clara 1
Diana 1
Dorothy 1
Emmeline 1
Evelina 1
Flora 1
Frances 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Julia 1
Laura 1
Lavinia 1
Lisetta 1
Louisa 1
Mabel 1
Mahala 1
Martha 1
Maryann 1
Matilda 1
Maud 1
Nellie 1
Rebecca 1
S.W. 1
Selina 1
Susanna 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Dyble surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 15
Robert 9
William 8
George 6
Henry 4
James 4
Walter 4
Edward 3
Thomas 3
Arthur 2
Charles 2
Herbert 2
Albert 1
Chas. 1
Edwin 1
Francis 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Harry 1
Isaac 1
Mark 1
Philip 1
Raynar 1
Richard 1
Samuel 1
Tom 1
Wainwright 1
Wallace 1

FAQ

Dyble surname: questions and answers

How common was the Dyble surname in 1881?

In 1881, 161 people were recorded with the Dyble surname. That placed it at #14,801 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Dyble surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 364 in 2016. That gives Dyble a modern rank of #12,748.

What does the Dyble map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Dyble bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.