NameCensus.

UK surname

Faram

In the 1881 census there were 98 people recorded with the Faram surname, ranking it #19,999 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 144, ranked #24,390, down from #19,999 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Astbury, Manchester and All Saints Poplar. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Stoke-on-Trent, Wirral and Newcastle-under-Lyme.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Faram is 151 in 2002. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 46.9%.

1881 census count

98

Ranked #19,999

Modern count

144

2016, ranked #24,390

Peak year

2002

151 bearers

Map years

5

1901 to 2016

Key insights

  • Faram had 98 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #19,999 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 144 in 2016, ranked #24,390.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 137 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Faram surname distribution map

The map shows where the Faram surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Faram surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Faram over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 66 #21,617
1861 historical 52 #27,369
1881 historical 98 #19,999
1891 historical 86 #25,951
1901 historical 103 #22,444
1911 historical 137 #18,880
1997 modern 97 #27,342
1998 modern 136 #23,013
1999 modern 143 #22,521
2000 modern 142 #22,544
2001 modern 138 #22,647
2002 modern 151 #21,809
2003 modern 142 #22,460
2004 modern 139 #22,891
2005 modern 138 #22,999
2006 modern 132 #23,834
2007 modern 142 #23,025
2008 modern 136 #24,004
2009 modern 139 #24,161
2010 modern 141 #24,460
2011 modern 142 #24,182
2012 modern 142 #24,148
2013 modern 141 #24,670
2014 modern 144 #24,504
2015 modern 145 #24,246
2016 modern 144 #24,390

Geography

Back to top

Where Farams are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Astbury, Manchester, All Saints Poplar, Whalley and London parishes. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Stoke-on-Trent, Wirral, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Pendle and Salford. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Astbury Cheshire
2 Manchester Lancashire
3 All Saints Poplar London (East Districts)
4 Whalley Lancashire
5 London parishes London 2

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Stoke-on-Trent 017 Stoke-on-Trent
2 Wirral 026 Wirral
3 Newcastle-under-Lyme 008 Newcastle-under-Lyme
4 Pendle 008 Pendle
5 Salford 021 Salford

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Faram

These lists show first names that appear often with the Faram surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Faram

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Faram, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Faram surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Faram household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Faram is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Faram is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Faram falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Faram is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Faram, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Faram families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Faram surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Cheshire leads with 31 Farams recorded in 1881 and an index of 14.40x.

County Total Index
Cheshire 31 14.40x
Lancashire 17 1.47x
Staffordshire 16 4.86x
Kent 10 3.00x
Middlesex 9 0.92x
Worcestershire 8 6.28x
Nottinghamshire 6 4.56x
Royal Navy 2 17.21x
Yorkshire 1 0.10x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Stoke Upon Trent in Staffordshire leads with 16 Farams recorded in 1881 and an index of 45.82x.

Place Total Index
Stoke Upon Trent 16 45.82x
Congleton 10 268.82x
Poplar London 9 48.89x
Windle 8 122.89x
Worcester St Peter 8 331.95x
Monks Coppenhall 7 86.10x
Eaton In Macclesfield 6 4615.38x
Gillingham 6 87.46x
Nottingham St Mary 6 17.64x
Woolwich 4 32.52x
Ardwick 3 28.74x
Harpurhey 3 186.34x
Odd Rode 3 280.37x
Alsager 2 370.37x
Royal Navy 2 20.12x
Barnsley 1 10.03x
Chorlton On Medlock 1 5.44x
Middlewich 1 227.27x
Newton In Northwich 1 151.52x
Pendleton In Salford 1 7.25x
Preston 1 3.23x
Sandbach 1 54.35x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Faram surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 14
Mary 5
Annie 4
Sarah 3
Alice 2
Emily 2
Emma 2
Fanny 2
Louisa 2
Anne 1
Edith 1
Eliz. 1
Eliza 1
Esther 1
Hannah 1
Horace 1
Isabella 1
Josephine 1
Kate 1
Louisia 1
Luara 1
Lucy 1
Martha 1
Penelepher 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Faram surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 7
William 6
Frederick 4
James 4
Alfred 3
Charles 3
George 3
Thomas 3
Arthur 2
Edward 2
Edwin 2
Samuel 2
Albert 1
Frank 1
Fredrick 1
Harry 1
Henry 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Faram surname: questions and answers

How common was the Faram surname in 1881?

In 1881, 98 people were recorded with the Faram surname. That placed it at #19,999 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Faram surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 144 in 2016. That gives Faram a modern rank of #24,390.

What does the Faram map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Faram bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.