NameCensus.

UK surname

Freake

In the 1881 census there were 67 people recorded with the Freake surname, ranking it #24,104 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 75, ranked #33,377, down from #24,104 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Kings Norton and Portsmouth, Portsea. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Gosport, Portsmouth and Cheshire West and Chester.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Freake is 111 in 1997. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 11.9%.

1881 census count

67

Ranked #24,104

Modern count

75

2016, ranked #33,377

Peak year

1997

111 bearers

Map years

2

1901 to 1998

Key insights

  • Freake had 67 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #24,104 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 75 in 2016, ranked #33,377.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 107 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Freake surname distribution map

The map shows where the Freake surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Freake surname density by area, 1998 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Freake over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 67 #21,440
1861 historical 31 #30,058
1881 historical 67 #24,104
1891 historical 88 #25,677
1901 historical 107 #21,955
1911 historical 92 #23,580
1997 modern 111 #25,394
1998 modern 106 #26,689
1999 modern 103 #27,305
2000 modern 108 #26,549
2001 modern 103 #26,927
2002 modern 105 #27,123
2003 modern 97 #28,217
2004 modern 93 #29,065
2005 modern 88 #29,831
2006 modern 89 #30,027
2007 modern 88 #30,515
2008 modern 85 #31,247
2009 modern 85 #31,717
2010 modern 85 #32,185
2011 modern 82 #32,449
2012 modern 77 #33,124
2013 modern 74 #33,483
2014 modern 77 #33,336
2015 modern 77 #33,272
2016 modern 75 #33,377

Geography

Back to top

Where Freakes are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Kings Norton, Portsmouth, Portsea, St Paul Deptford, St Nicholas Deptford and Durweston. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Gosport, Portsmouth, Cheshire West and Chester, Taunton Deane and Powys. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 3
2 Kings Norton Worcestershire
3 Portsmouth, Portsea Hampshire
4 St Paul Deptford, St Nicholas Deptford London (South Districts)
5 Durweston Dorset

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Gosport 001 Gosport
2 Portsmouth 014 Portsmouth
3 Cheshire West and Chester 023 Cheshire West and Chester
4 Taunton Deane 014 Taunton Deane
5 Powys 011 Powys

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Freake

These lists show first names that appear often with the Freake surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Freake

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Freake, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Freake surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Freake household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins

Within London, Freake is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector and Diverse Origins, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered across London’s Inner and Outer suburbs, residents of these neighbourhoods are typically housed in the social rented sector. Although terraced and semi-detached houses predominate, more residents live in flats than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Neighbourhoods are more ethnically diverse than the Supergroup average. Those identifying as of Bangladeshi, Pakistani and some Black ethnicities are more prevalent. Europeans born in a overseas non-EU countries make up more of the lower proportion of residents identifying as White. Few residents are very old (85+). Employment in distribution, hotels and restaurants is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Freake is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Freake falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Freake is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of Over 70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

10
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Freake, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Freake families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Freake surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 31 Freakes recorded in 1881 and an index of 4.74x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 31 4.74x
Hampshire 10 7.47x
Warwickshire 8 4.85x
Kent 6 2.69x
Berkshire 3 6.12x
Dorset 3 6.99x
Surrey 2 0.63x
Wiltshire 2 3.46x
Gloucestershire 1 0.78x
Lancashire 1 0.13x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Portsea in Hampshire leads with 10 Freakes recorded in 1881 and an index of 38.10x.

Place Total Index
Portsea 10 38.10x
Birmingham 8 14.56x
Edmonton 8 151.80x
Hillingdon 6 288.46x
Paddington London 6 24.97x
St Lawrence 5 326.80x
St Botolph Bishopsgate 4 434.78x
Hackney London 3 8.19x
Reading St Giles 3 62.37x
Damerham 2 1428.57x
Hammersmith London 2 12.42x
Kensington London 2 5.51x
Blandford Forum 1 117.65x
Charlton Next Woolwich 1 42.92x
Cheetham 1 17.30x
Frimley 1 109.89x
Langton Long Blandford 1 1666.67x
Shapwick 1 1000.00x
Southwark St Saviour 1 29.76x
Stapleton 1 41.15x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Freake surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Jane 3
Eliza 2
Harriet 2
Kate 2
Matilda 2
Sarah 2
Ada 1
Alice 1
Ann 1
Annie 1
Aria 1
Charistiana 1
Charlotte 1
Clemintina 1
Diana 1
Eleanor 1
Elizth. 1
Ellen 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Isabella 1
Julia 1
Laura 1
Lucy 1
Margaret 1
Maria 1
Marie 1
Martha 1
Minna 1
Sissy 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Freake surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 4
George 3
Thomas 3
Arthur 2
Charles 2
Frederick 2
James 2
John 2
Richard 2
Chas.W.F. 1
Clifford 1
Frank 1
Henry 1
Percy 1
Samuel 1
Tom. 1
Walter 1

Top occupations

Occupational titles are kept as recorded and later transcribed, so related jobs, spelling variants and mistakes stay separate. Scholar was the census term for a child in education. That means the other rows often tell you more about adult work in Freake households.

FAQ

Freake surname: questions and answers

How common was the Freake surname in 1881?

In 1881, 67 people were recorded with the Freake surname. That placed it at #24,104 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Freake surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 75 in 2016. That gives Freake a modern rank of #33,377.

What does the Freake map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Freake bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.