NameCensus.

UK surname

Grieveson

In the 1881 census there were 167 people recorded with the Grieveson surname, ranking it #14,443 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 486, ranked #10,189, up from #14,443 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Darlington and Rochester. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Malvern Hills, Newcastle upon Tyne and Gateshead.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Grieveson is 500 in 2002. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 191.0%.

1881 census count

167

Ranked #14,443

Modern count

486

2016, ranked #10,189

Peak year

2002

500 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Grieveson had 167 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,443 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 486 in 2016, ranked #10,189.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 408 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Grieveson surname distribution map

The map shows where the Grieveson surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Grieveson surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Grieveson over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 130 #14,314
1861 historical 97 #21,503
1881 historical 167 #14,443
1891 historical 234 #13,352
1901 historical 304 #11,543
1911 historical 408 #9,161
1997 modern 464 #9,831
1998 modern 480 #9,909
1999 modern 469 #10,139
2000 modern 466 #10,163
2001 modern 463 #10,009
2002 modern 500 #9,625
2003 modern 484 #9,717
2004 modern 489 #9,652
2005 modern 485 #9,647
2006 modern 490 #9,613
2007 modern 488 #9,740
2008 modern 484 #9,877
2009 modern 500 #9,862
2010 modern 497 #10,111
2011 modern 484 #10,194
2012 modern 471 #10,313
2013 modern 488 #10,211
2014 modern 490 #10,233
2015 modern 486 #10,216
2016 modern 486 #10,189

Geography

Back to top

Where Grievesons are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Darlington, Rochester, Gateshead and Durham St Oswald. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Malvern Hills, Newcastle upon Tyne, Gateshead, North Tyneside and County Durham. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Darlington Durham
3 Rochester Kent
4 Gateshead Durham
5 Durham St Oswald Durham

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Malvern Hills 003 Malvern Hills
2 Newcastle upon Tyne 020 Newcastle upon Tyne
3 Gateshead 021 Gateshead
4 North Tyneside 030 North Tyneside
5 County Durham 038 County Durham

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Grieveson

These lists show first names that appear often with the Grieveson surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Grieveson

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Grieveson, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Grieveson surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Grieveson household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Grieveson is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Grieveson is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Grieveson falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Grieveson is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Grieveson, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Grieveson families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Grieveson surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Durham leads with 100 Grievesons recorded in 1881 and an index of 20.63x.

County Total Index
Durham 100 20.63x
Northumberland 27 11.14x
Kent 16 2.88x
Middlesex 8 0.49x
Lancashire 6 0.31x
Yorkshire 4 0.25x
Cumberland 3 2.14x
Essex 2 0.62x
Buckinghamshire 1 1.02x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Byker in Northumberland leads with 16 Grievesons recorded in 1881 and an index of 133.56x.

Place Total Index
Byker 16 133.56x
Rochester St Margaret 15 255.97x
Darlington 14 74.83x
Bishopwearmouth 11 26.44x
Tanfield 10 173.61x
Gateshead 8 22.05x
Barnard Castle 7 291.67x
Westoe 7 25.48x
Bishop Middleham 6 2307.69x
Gainford 6 1200.00x
Kensington London 6 6.62x
Little Crosby 6 1935.48x
Longbenton 6 58.42x
Crossgate 5 235.85x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 4 19.06x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 4 27.62x
Norton 4 224.72x
Sherburn 4 272.11x
Bradford 3 7.68x
Ryhope 3 89.29x
Clerkenwell London 2 5.20x
Ford 2 137.93x
Heworth 2 20.94x
Redmarshall Carlton 2 1176.47x
St Cuthbert W O 2 29.24x
St Giles 2 66.23x
West Ham 2 2.82x
Alston 1 38.76x
Byers Green 1 72.99x
East Rounton 1 1111.11x
Elswick 1 5.17x
Hambleden 1 119.05x
Lanchester 1 112.36x
Lynesack Softley 1 76.34x
Woolwich 1 4.87x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Grieveson surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 23
Elizabeth 9
Margaret 9
Sarah 7
Annie 4
Catherine 3
Eliza 3
Ellen 3
Emma 3
Jane 3
Ann 2
Dorothy 2
Ada 1
Alice 1
Anna 1
Anne 1
Bertha 1
Erma 1
Esther 1
Ethel 1
Flora 1
Frances 1
Hannah 1
Harriett 1
Matilda 1
Olive 1
Rose 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Grieveson surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 18
Thomas 11
George 9
William 9
Henry 4
James 4
Joseph 4
Robert 4
Matthew 3
Cuthbert 2
Frederick 2
Agar 1
Arthur 1
Charles 1
Edward 1
Edwin 1
Everad 1
Isaac 1
Owen 1
Ralph 1
Richard 1

FAQ

Grieveson surname: questions and answers

How common was the Grieveson surname in 1881?

In 1881, 167 people were recorded with the Grieveson surname. That placed it at #14,443 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Grieveson surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 486 in 2016. That gives Grieveson a modern rank of #10,189.

What does the Grieveson map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Grieveson bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.