NameCensus.

UK surname

Judges

In the 1881 census there were 206 people recorded with the Judges surname, ranking it #12,596 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 259, ranked #16,393, down from #12,596 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Graveney, Boughton-under-Blean, Snodland with Paddleworth and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Ashford, Medway and Maidstone.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Judges is 320 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 25.7%.

1881 census count

206

Ranked #12,596

Modern count

259

2016, ranked #16,393

Peak year

1911

320 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Judges had 206 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #12,596 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 259 in 2016, ranked #16,393.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 320 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Judges surname distribution map

The map shows where the Judges surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Judges surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Judges over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 168 #11,873
1861 historical 177 #13,265
1881 historical 206 #12,596
1891 historical 319 #10,563
1901 historical 295 #11,783
1911 historical 320 #10,932
1997 modern 269 #14,543
1998 modern 272 #14,846
1999 modern 273 #14,875
2000 modern 281 #14,567
2001 modern 264 #14,958
2002 modern 251 #15,770
2003 modern 256 #15,377
2004 modern 259 #15,348
2005 modern 244 #15,900
2006 modern 247 #15,860
2007 modern 240 #16,392
2008 modern 241 #16,481
2009 modern 253 #16,283
2010 modern 260 #16,343
2011 modern 254 #16,458
2012 modern 248 #16,618
2013 modern 256 #16,506
2014 modern 261 #16,421
2015 modern 251 #16,756
2016 modern 259 #16,393

Geography

Back to top

Where Judges' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Graveney, Boughton-under-Blean, Snodland with Paddleworth, London parishes, Dartford and Yalding, Aylesford, Burham, Mereworth, Wateringbury, Nettlestead. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Ashford, Medway, Maidstone, Manchester and North Dorset. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Graveney, Boughton-under-Blean Kent
2 Snodland with Paddleworth Kent
3 London parishes London 3
4 Dartford Kent
5 Yalding, Aylesford, Burham, Mereworth, Wateringbury, Nettlestead Kent

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Ashford 012 Ashford
2 Medway 037 Medway
3 Maidstone 007 Maidstone
4 Manchester 017 Manchester
5 North Dorset 008 North Dorset

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Judges

These lists show first names that appear often with the Judges surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Judges

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Judges, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Judges surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Judges household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Judges is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Judges is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Judges falls in decile 7 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

7
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Judges is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Judges, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Judges families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Judges surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 150 Judges' recorded in 1881 and an index of 22.42x.

County Total Index
Kent 150 22.42x
Middlesex 21 1.07x
Surrey 9 0.94x
Essex 5 1.29x
Sussex 5 1.51x
Leicestershire 4 1.84x
Norfolk 2 0.66x
Cheshire 1 0.23x
Glamorgan 1 0.29x
Huntingdonshire 1 2.57x
Suffolk 1 0.42x
Yorkshire 1 0.05x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Shorne in Kent leads with 23 Judges' recorded in 1881 and an index of 3898.31x.

Place Total Index
Shorne 23 3898.31x
Snodland 22 1157.89x
Borden 15 1764.71x
Maidstone 12 60.24x
Boughton Under Blean 11 982.14x
Lynsted 10 1149.43x
Faversham 9 141.07x
Aylesford 8 432.43x
Higham 7 777.78x
St Marylebone London 7 6.69x
Islington London 6 3.16x
East Grinstead 5 106.84x
Kensington London 5 4.59x
Newington 5 6.90x
Sittingbourne 5 94.70x
Yalding 5 295.86x
Birling 4 677.97x
Halling 4 454.55x
Loughborough 4 40.57x
Camberwell 3 2.40x
Great Coggeshall 3 149.25x
Bobbing 2 625.00x
Hougham 2 50.25x
Norwich St Peter 2 101.01x
Preston Next Faversham 2 127.39x
West Ham 2 2.34x
West Malling 2 132.45x
Birkenhead 1 2.90x
Bow London 1 4.01x
Burham 1 108.70x
Charing 1 109.89x
Chatham 1 5.43x
East Malling 1 62.50x
Ipswich St Lawrence 1 312.50x
Lambeth 1 0.59x
Mile End New Town London 1 25.84x
Mile End Old Town London 1 2.40x
Peterstone Super Ely 1 625.00x
Skelbrooke 1 1111.11x
St Ives 1 49.51x
Tonbridge 1 4.14x
Wateringbury 1 114.94x
Woolwich 1 4.05x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Judges surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Judges surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 14
William 12
George 8
Henry 8
James 6
Albert 5
Edwin 5
Frederick 5
Walter 5
Alfred 4
Thomas 4
Stephen 3
Edmund 2
Edward 2
Arthur 1
Bennett 1
Charels 1
Charles 1
Edwrd. 1
Ernest 1
Francis 1
Frederic 1
Fredk. 1
Fredrick 1
Harold 1
Harrey 1
Harry 1
Horrace 1
Isaac 1
Joseph 1
Leonard 1
Maurice 1
Saunders 1
Willian 1

FAQ

Judges surname: questions and answers

How common was the Judges surname in 1881?

In 1881, 206 people were recorded with the Judges surname. That placed it at #12,596 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Judges surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 259 in 2016. That gives Judges a modern rank of #16,393.

What does the Judges map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Judges bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.