NameCensus.

UK surname

Kingshott

In the 1881 census there were 265 people recorded with the Kingshott surname, ranking it #10,612 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 543, ranked #9,384, up from #10,612 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Lurgasall and Woolbeding, Linch, Bepton, Farnhurst, Linchmere, Steep. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include East Hampshire, Rother and Lewes.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Kingshott is 578 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 104.9%.

1881 census count

265

Ranked #10,612

Modern count

543

2016, ranked #9,384

Peak year

1999

578 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Kingshott had 265 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #10,612 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 543 in 2016, ranked #9,384.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 468 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Kingshott surname distribution map

The map shows where the Kingshott surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Kingshott surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Kingshott over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 146 #13,157
1861 historical 147 #15,539
1881 historical 265 #10,612
1891 historical 322 #10,507
1901 historical 414 #9,254
1911 historical 468 #8,247
1997 modern 539 #8,796
1998 modern 567 #8,715
1999 modern 578 #8,652
2000 modern 558 #8,841
2001 modern 541 #8,909
2002 modern 550 #8,981
2003 modern 549 #8,854
2004 modern 549 #8,878
2005 modern 529 #9,066
2006 modern 523 #9,170
2007 modern 519 #9,300
2008 modern 521 #9,342
2009 modern 559 #9,055
2010 modern 571 #9,096
2011 modern 566 #9,070
2012 modern 563 #9,023
2013 modern 556 #9,249
2014 modern 554 #9,331
2015 modern 547 #9,353
2016 modern 543 #9,384

Geography

Back to top

Where Kingshotts are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Lurgasall, Woolbeding, Linch, Bepton, Farnhurst, Linchmere, Steep and St Pancras. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to East Hampshire, Rother, Lewes, Guildford and Cornwall. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Lurgasall Sussex
3 Woolbeding, Linch, Bepton, Farnhurst, Linchmere, Steep Sussex
4 London parishes London 3
5 St Pancras London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 East Hampshire 009 East Hampshire
2 Rother 001 Rother
3 Lewes 009 Lewes
4 Guildford 017 Guildford
5 Cornwall 057 Cornwall

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Kingshott

These lists show first names that appear often with the Kingshott surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Kingshott

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Kingshott, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Kingshott surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Kingshott household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Kingshott is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Kingshott is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Kingshott falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Kingshott is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Kingshott, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Kingshott families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Kingshott surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Sussex leads with 98 Kingshotts recorded in 1881 and an index of 22.40x.

County Total Index
Sussex 98 22.40x
Surrey 59 4.67x
Hampshire 51 9.59x
Middlesex 48 1.85x
Buckinghamshire 6 3.82x
Lancashire 3 0.10x
Royal Navy 1 3.23x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. St Pancras London in Middlesex leads with 18 Kingshotts recorded in 1881 and an index of 8.62x.

Place Total Index
St Pancras London 18 8.62x
Bramshott 16 1221.37x
Frensham 16 860.22x
Fernhurst 14 1443.30x
Lurgashall 10 1538.46x
Didling 9 11250.00x
Elstead 9 1475.41x
Harting 9 789.47x
Petworth 9 344.83x
Wandsworth 9 36.03x
Islington London 8 3.18x
Chalton 7 3888.89x
Croydon 7 9.97x
Paddington London 7 7.34x
Petersfield 7 479.45x
Great Marlow 6 141.84x
Hampstead London 6 14.85x
Lodsworth 6 983.61x
Treyford 6 4615.38x
Burpham 5 1388.89x
Eastbourne 5 24.84x
Hawkley 5 1851.85x
North Chapel 5 704.23x
Alton 4 99.75x
Bermondsey 4 5.18x
Mile End Old Town London 4 7.24x
Terwick 4 2500.00x
Witley 4 449.44x
Broadwater 3 29.91x
Buriton 3 294.12x
Farnborough 3 53.67x
Frimley 3 83.33x
Kensington London 3 2.08x
Linchmere 3 967.74x
Liverpool 3 1.60x
South Stoke 3 2500.00x
Thakeham 3 625.00x
Godalming 2 25.13x
Lambeth 2 0.88x
Selborne 2 185.19x
Storrington 2 166.67x
Chelsea London 1 1.28x
Ealing 1 4.31x
Elsted 1 555.56x
Guildford Friary 1 250.00x
Guildford Holy Trinity 1 41.49x
Headley 1 68.97x
Portsea 1 0.96x
Royal Navy 1 3.78x
Winchfield 1 303.03x
Wisborough Green 1 68.03x
Woking 1 13.12x
Wymering 1 114.94x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Kingshott surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Kingshott surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 20
George 17
Henry 13
Charles 11
James 11
Frederick 7
Arthur 6
Thomas 6
Alfred 5
Daniel 4
John 4
Joseph 3
Walter 3
Albert 2
Edmund 2
Edward 2
Harry 2
Issac 2
Samuel 2
Andrew 1
Benjamin 1
Christufer 1
David 1
Edwin 1
Eric 1
Eumoni 1
Frank 1
Fredrick 1
Herbert 1
Isaac 1
Maurice 1
Nasimiah 1
Robert 1
Sidney 1
Stephen 1
Willm.Thos. 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Kingshott surname: questions and answers

How common was the Kingshott surname in 1881?

In 1881, 265 people were recorded with the Kingshott surname. That placed it at #10,612 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Kingshott surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 543 in 2016. That gives Kingshott a modern rank of #9,384.

What does the Kingshott map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Kingshott bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.