NameCensus.

UK surname

Legh

In the 1881 census there were 79 people recorded with the Legh surname, ranking it #22,357 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 25, ranked #36,324, down from #22,357 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Sedgley, London parishes and Lewisham. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Legh is 104 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 68.4%.

1881 census count

79

Ranked #22,357

Modern count

25

2016, ranked #36,324

Peak year

1861

104 bearers

Map years

1

1861 to 1861

Key insights

  • Legh had 79 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #22,357 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 25 in 2016, ranked #36,324.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 104 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Legh surname distribution map

The map shows where the Legh surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Legh surname density by area, 1861 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Legh over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 91 #18,187
1861 historical 104 #20,477
1881 historical 79 #22,357
1891 historical 90 #25,399
1901 historical 61 #27,379
1911 historical 75 #25,322
1997 modern 36 #34,071
1998 modern 39 #33,967
1999 modern 43 #33,683
2000 modern 40 #33,976
2001 modern 40 #33,842
2002 modern 39 #34,219
2003 modern 35 #34,609
2004 modern 31 #35,105
2005 modern 27 #35,588
2006 modern 27 #35,746
2007 modern 23 #36,142
2008 modern 24 #36,148
2009 modern 27 #36,045
2010 modern 27 #36,153
2011 modern 28 #36,071
2012 modern 27 #36,102
2013 modern 26 #36,217
2014 modern 27 #36,180
2015 modern 27 #36,173
2016 modern 25 #36,324

Geography

Back to top

Where Leghs are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Sedgley, London parishes, Lewisham, Shrewsbury St Alkmond, St Julian, St Mary (pt), Meole Brace and Oswestry. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Sedgley Staffordshire
2 London parishes London 1
3 Lewisham London (South Districts)
4 Shrewsbury St Alkmond, St Julian, St Mary (pt), Meole Brace Shropshire
5 Oswestry Shropshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Legh

These lists show first names that appear often with the Legh surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Legh

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Legh, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Legh surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Legh household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Legh is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Legh is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Legh, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Legh families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Legh surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Shropshire leads with 37 Leghs recorded in 1881 and an index of 53.55x.

County Total Index
Shropshire 37 53.55x
Kent 9 3.30x
Cheshire 7 3.96x
Middlesex 7 0.88x
Staffordshire 5 1.85x
Worcestershire 3 2.87x
Channel Islands 2 8.44x
Montgomeryshire 2 10.91x
Suffolk 2 2.05x
Aberdeenshire 1 1.35x
Derbyshire 1 0.80x
Hampshire 1 0.61x
Lancashire 1 0.11x
Norfolk 1 0.81x
Royal Navy 1 10.49x
Surrey 1 0.26x
Sussex 1 0.74x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Astley in Shropshire leads with 9 Leghs recorded in 1881 and an index of 15000.00x.

Place Total Index
Astley 9 15000.00x
Charlton 6 331.49x
Oswestry Rural 5 471.70x
Welsh Hampton 5 3571.43x
Bramhall 4 547.95x
Sedgley 4 39.88x
Shrewsbury St Alkmond 4 1052.63x
Bretforton 3 2000.00x
Ellesmere 3 252.10x
Meole Brace 3 833.33x
Chelsea London 2 8.30x
Deythur 2 1666.67x
Lowestoft 2 43.48x
Oswestry Town 2 90.50x
Shoreditch London 2 5.77x
Shrewsbury St Chad 2 82.30x
St George Hanover Square 2 14.19x
St Helier 2 25.91x
Tonbridge 2 20.33x
Whittington 2 344.83x
Aberdeen St Nicholas 1 7.22x
Adlington 1 416.67x
Ardingly 1 232.56x
Beswick 1 41.15x
Bollin Fee 1 128.21x
Brinnington 1 60.61x
Denston 1 833.33x
Derby St Werburgh 1 13.83x
East Molesey 1 111.11x
Farnborough 1 58.14x
Heigham 1 15.15x
Kensington London 1 2.25x
Lewisham 1 6.87x
Newport 1 120.48x
Royal Navy 1 12.27x
Shrewsbury St Mary 1 36.63x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Legh surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 7
Ann 3
Caroline 2
Edith 2
Fanny 2
Hannah 2
Martha 2
Sarah 2
Agnes 1
Alice 1
Anne 1
Annie 1
Catherine 1
Dulcibella 1
Eleanor 1
Ellen 1
Emily 1
Emma 1
Evelyn 1
Florence 1
Frances 1
Gertrude 1
Hester 1
Isabella 1
Isabelle 1
Isebella 1
Julia 1
Lucy 1
M.A. 1
Mabel 1
Manan 1
Minnie 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Legh surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Henry 4
Richard 4
Charles 2
James 2
John 2
William 2
Albert 1
Arthur 1
Bernard 1
Edmund 1
Edward 1
Edwd.Birch 1
Francis 1
Geoffrey 1
Gilbert 1
J.Arthur 1
Oswald 1
Piers 1
Reginald 1
Sidney 1
Thos.W. 1

FAQ

Legh surname: questions and answers

How common was the Legh surname in 1881?

In 1881, 79 people were recorded with the Legh surname. That placed it at #22,357 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Legh surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 25 in 2016. That gives Legh a modern rank of #36,324.

What does the Legh map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Legh bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.