NameCensus.

UK surname

Lewsley

In the 1881 census there were 120 people recorded with the Lewsley surname, ranking it #17,756 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 229, ranked #17,878, down from #17,756 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Burton-on-Trent, Hull Holy Trinity and Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Camden, Derby and Leeds.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Lewsley is 256 in 2002. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 90.8%.

1881 census count

120

Ranked #17,756

Modern count

229

2016, ranked #17,878

Peak year

2002

256 bearers

Map years

7

1881 to 2016

Key insights

  • Lewsley had 120 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,756 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 229 in 2016, ranked #17,878.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 166 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Lewsley surname distribution map

The map shows where the Lewsley surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Lewsley surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Lewsley over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 56 #23,235
1861 historical 70 #24,911
1881 historical 120 #17,756
1891 historical 140 #19,193
1901 historical 166 #17,011
1911 historical 144 #18,325
1997 modern 243 #15,556
1998 modern 241 #16,065
1999 modern 246 #15,974
2000 modern 253 #15,623
2001 modern 242 #15,832
2002 modern 256 #15,565
2003 modern 249 #15,653
2004 modern 253 #15,583
2005 modern 235 #16,335
2006 modern 232 #16,600
2007 modern 232 #16,795
2008 modern 225 #17,282
2009 modern 242 #16,789
2010 modern 235 #17,477
2011 modern 236 #17,279
2012 modern 237 #17,132
2013 modern 230 #17,756
2014 modern 232 #17,761
2015 modern 228 #17,899
2016 modern 229 #17,878

Geography

Back to top

Where Lewsleys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Burton-on-Trent, Hull Holy Trinity, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, St Pancras and Glasgow. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Camden, Derby, Leeds, Thurrock and Erewash. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Burton-on-Trent Staffordshire
2 Hull Holy Trinity Yorkshire, East Riding
3 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
4 St Pancras London (North Districts)
5 Glasgow Lanark

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Camden 028 Camden
2 Derby 002 Derby
3 Leeds 101 Leeds
4 Thurrock 013 Thurrock
5 Erewash 013 Erewash

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Lewsley

These lists show first names that appear often with the Lewsley surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Lewsley

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Lewsley, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Lewsley surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Lewsley household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Challenged Inner London Communities

Within London, Lewsley is most associated with areas classed as Challenged Inner London Communities, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Resident in some of Inner London’s most over-crowded communities, many families have children and marriage/civil partnership rates are above the Supergroup average. Other adults such as students live in communal establishments. Few residents have Level 4 educational qualifications, levels of unemployment are above the Supergroup average, and employment is concentrated in service occupations such as distribution, hotels and restaurants. Relative to the Supergroup average, fewer residents identify as being of mixed/multiple ethnicities, Black or Other Asian.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Lewsley is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Lewsley falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Lewsley is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Lewsley, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Lewsley families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Lewsley surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Derbyshire leads with 33 Lewsleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.01x.

County Total Index
Derbyshire 33 18.01x
Yorkshire 29 2.50x
Lanarkshire 16 4.23x
Lincolnshire 9 4.81x
Middlesex 9 0.77x
Surrey 9 1.58x
Staffordshire 7 1.77x
Essex 5 2.16x
Lancashire 2 0.14x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.63x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Ockbrook in Derbyshire leads with 25 Lewsleys recorded in 1881 and an index of 3205.13x.

Place Total Index
Ockbrook 25 3205.13x
Glasgow 9 13.39x
Cottingham 8 320.00x
Drypool 8 449.44x
Burton Extra 7 309.73x
Wortley In Bramley 6 65.36x
Burnham 5 588.24x
Armley 4 78.28x
Barony 4 4.18x
Bermondsey 4 11.48x
Hasland 4 213.90x
Islington London 4 3.53x
Litchurch 4 54.27x
Bicker 3 1034.48x
Kirton 3 400.00x
Old Monkland 3 19.97x
Sheffield 3 8.13x
St Pancras London 3 3.18x
Gosberton 2 240.96x
Hulme 2 6.90x
Kingston On Thames 2 14.60x
Southwark St George Martyr 2 8.49x
Westminster St John 2 14.04x
Boston 1 17.61x
Camberwell 1 1.34x
Snenton 1 16.13x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Lewsley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Lewsley surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

FAQ

Lewsley surname: questions and answers

How common was the Lewsley surname in 1881?

In 1881, 120 people were recorded with the Lewsley surname. That placed it at #17,756 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Lewsley surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 229 in 2016. That gives Lewsley a modern rank of #17,878.

What does the Lewsley map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Lewsley bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.