NameCensus.

UK surname

Peakman

In the 1881 census there were 159 people recorded with the Peakman surname, ranking it #14,935 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 267, ranked #16,054, down from #14,935 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Harborne, Yardley and Rowley Regis. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Walsall, Wyre Forest and Sandwell.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Peakman is 295 in 2011. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 67.9%.

1881 census count

159

Ranked #14,935

Modern count

267

2016, ranked #16,054

Peak year

2011

295 bearers

Map years

8

1861 to 2016

Key insights

  • Peakman had 159 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #14,935 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 267 in 2016, ranked #16,054.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 258 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Peakman surname distribution map

The map shows where the Peakman surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Peakman surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Peakman over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 92 #18,050
1861 historical 100 #21,103
1881 historical 159 #14,935
1891 historical 179 #16,198
1901 historical 254 #13,005
1911 historical 258 #12,614
1997 modern 282 #14,072
1998 modern 287 #14,289
1999 modern 291 #14,234
2000 modern 283 #14,488
2001 modern 266 #14,878
2002 modern 264 #15,236
2003 modern 262 #15,150
2004 modern 269 #14,955
2005 modern 261 #15,216
2006 modern 271 #14,880
2007 modern 272 #14,994
2008 modern 275 #15,036
2009 modern 279 #15,184
2010 modern 284 #15,312
2011 modern 295 #14,758
2012 modern 274 #15,498
2013 modern 275 #15,719
2014 modern 276 #15,788
2015 modern 273 #15,789
2016 modern 267 #16,054

Geography

Back to top

Where Peakmans are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Harborne, Yardley, Rowley Regis, Walsall and Birmingham Town: Birmingham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Walsall, Wyre Forest and Sandwell. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Harborne Worcestershire
2 Yardley Warwickshire
3 Rowley Regis Staffordshire
4 Walsall Staffordshire
5 Birmingham Town: Birmingham Warwickshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Walsall 013 Walsall
2 Wyre Forest 009 Wyre Forest
3 Sandwell 022 Sandwell
4 Walsall 018 Walsall
5 Walsall 024 Walsall

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Peakman

These lists show first names that appear often with the Peakman surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Peakman

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Peakman, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Peakman surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Peakman household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles

Group

Inner London Working Professionals

Within London, Peakman is most associated with areas classed as Inner London Working Professionals, part of Professional Employment and Family Lifecycles. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These primarily Inner London neighbourhoods are more densely populated than the Supergroup average. Residents have a younger over-all age profile than the Supergroup as a whole, and are less likely to be owner occupiers. Full time employment is more common than elsewhere in the Supergroup and multiple car ownership is uncommon. Chinese and non-EU-born European migrants are less in evidence than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

These neighbourhoods house people of all ages, predominantly of White British or European extraction. Resident turnover is low. Religious affiliation is less common than average and tends to be Christian if expressed. Homeownership, typically of terraced houses, is common but use of the social rented sector is not. Employment is typically in professional, managerial and associate professional or technical occupations. There are few full-time students. Level 4 qualifications are common. More households lack dependent children than have them which, considered alongside low levels of crowding and over-all age structure, indicates that many households may be post child-rearing and in late middle age. Incidence of disability is low, as is residence in communal establishments.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Peakman is most concentrated in decile 6 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

6
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Peakman falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Peakman is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Peakman, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Peakman families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Peakman surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Warwickshire leads with 62 Peakmans recorded in 1881 and an index of 15.85x.

County Total Index
Warwickshire 62 15.85x
Staffordshire 53 10.12x
Yorkshire 23 1.50x
Worcestershire 13 6.42x
Surrey 5 0.66x
Durham 1 0.22x
Kent 1 0.19x
Lancashire 1 0.05x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Aston in Warwickshire leads with 50 Peakmans recorded in 1881 and an index of 46.43x.

Place Total Index
Aston 50 46.43x
Harborne 16 95.35x
Rowley Regis 12 82.25x
Walsall Foreign 9 33.28x
Birmingham 8 6.14x
Kings Norton 8 44.05x
Middlesbrough 7 34.98x
Headingley Cum Burley 6 60.67x
Wolstanton 6 37.74x
East Witton Without 5 4166.67x
Southwark St George Martyr 4 12.82x
Wolverhampton 4 9.94x
Yardley 4 77.22x
Stoke Upon Trent 3 5.40x
Brightside Bierlow 2 6.64x
Spennithorne 2 1818.18x
Barrow In Furness 1 4.00x
Coventry Holy Trinity 1 8.56x
Edgbaston 1 8.24x
Great Aycliffe 1 222.22x
Handsworth 1 7.75x
Ipsley 1 138.89x
Redditch 1 24.33x
Rochester St Margaret 1 17.92x
Sutton Coldfield 1 24.33x
Tipton 1 6.24x
Walsall Borough 1 24.63x
Wandsworth 1 6.70x
West Witton 1 370.37x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Peakman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 14
Elizabeth 7
Emma 7
Sarah 7
Ellen 4
Martha 4
Eliza 3
Esther 3
Jane 3
Amy 2
Ann 2
Eva 2
Hannah 2
Harriet 2
Laura 2
Lilly 2
Louisa 2
Alice 1
Anabella 1
Annie 1
Catherine 1
Edith 1
Ester 1
Ethel 1
Fanny 1
Frances 1
Grace 1
Gurtrude 1
Helen 1
Kate 1
Lily 1
Maria 1
Prudence 1
Rachel 1
Rebecia. 1
Silley 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Peakman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 10
James 7
Thomas 7
William 6
George 5
Joseph 5
Alfred 4
Charles 4
Edward 4
Henry 3
Arthur 1
Chas.Jos. 1
Ernest 1
Felice 1
Francis 1
Harry 1
Herbert 1
Horatio 1
Peter 1
Richard 1
Robert 1
Samuel 1
Simeon 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Peakman surname: questions and answers

How common was the Peakman surname in 1881?

In 1881, 159 people were recorded with the Peakman surname. That placed it at #14,935 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Peakman surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 267 in 2016. That gives Peakman a modern rank of #16,054.

What does the Peakman map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Peakman bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.