NameCensus.

UK surname

Pakeman

In the 1881 census there were 127 people recorded with the Pakeman surname, ranking it #17,166 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 79, ranked #33,100, down from #17,166 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to St Peter, Stapleford and Swindon, Lyddington. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Plymouth, Vale of White Horse and Staffordshire Moorlands.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Pakeman is 181 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 37.8%.

1881 census count

127

Ranked #17,166

Modern count

79

2016, ranked #33,100

Peak year

1911

181 bearers

Map years

7

1851 to 1998

Key insights

  • Pakeman had 127 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #17,166 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 79 in 2016, ranked #33,100.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 181 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Ageing Communities.

Pakeman surname distribution map

The map shows where the Pakeman surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Pakeman surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Pakeman over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 117 #15,456
1861 historical 123 #17,914
1881 historical 127 #17,166
1891 historical 165 #17,143
1901 historical 167 #16,943
1911 historical 181 #15,911
1997 modern 101 #26,774
1998 modern 102 #27,314
1999 modern 100 #27,757
2000 modern 99 #27,845
2001 modern 95 #28,101
2002 modern 96 #28,534
2003 modern 93 #28,829
2004 modern 91 #29,345
2005 modern 89 #29,683
2006 modern 86 #30,425
2007 modern 91 #30,061
2008 modern 86 #31,114
2009 modern 88 #31,352
2010 modern 93 #31,239
2011 modern 87 #31,905
2012 modern 84 #32,502
2013 modern 79 #33,142
2014 modern 84 #32,823
2015 modern 77 #33,272
2016 modern 79 #33,100

Geography

Back to top

Where Pakemans are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around St Peter, Stapleford, Swindon, Lyddington, Burton-on-Trent and St Mary Islington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Plymouth, Vale of White Horse, Staffordshire Moorlands and Doncaster. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 St Peter Derbyshire
2 Stapleford Derbyshire
3 Swindon, Lyddington Wiltshire
4 Burton-on-Trent Staffordshire
5 St Mary Islington London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Plymouth 029 Plymouth
2 Vale of White Horse 009 Vale of White Horse
3 Staffordshire Moorlands 005 Staffordshire Moorlands
4 Vale of White Horse 016 Vale of White Horse
5 Doncaster 009 Doncaster

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Pakeman

These lists show first names that appear often with the Pakeman surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Pakeman

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Pakeman, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Ageing Communities

Nationally, the Pakeman surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Ageing Communities, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Pakeman household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many residents are of normal retirement age or above and live in communal establishments, and there are few dependent children. The dominant property type is a mix of retirement flats and detached houses. Those in work are likely to be employed in managerial and professional occupations, and many residents are educated to degree level. Levels of owner occupation are high, but the private rental sector is also present. Rural locations predominate.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

Professional Periphery

Within London, Pakeman is most associated with areas classed as Professional Periphery, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods predominantly house residents aged 45+, with many aged 85+. Most employed residents work in senior roles, and relatively few work in unskilled jobs. Terraced housing is comparatively rare, but communal living is more common. More residents identify as of Indian ethnicity and more affiliate with non-Christian religions. Disability levels are below the Supergroup average.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Pakeman is most concentrated in decile 1 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

1
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Pakeman falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Pakeman is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Pakeman, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Pakeman families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Pakeman surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Derbyshire leads with 27 Pakemans recorded in 1881 and an index of 13.92x.

County Total Index
Derbyshire 27 13.92x
Middlesex 25 2.02x
Staffordshire 16 3.83x
Warwickshire 14 4.48x
Kent 10 2.37x
Wiltshire 8 7.30x
Lancashire 7 0.48x
Essex 6 2.45x
Nottinghamshire 5 2.99x
Worcestershire 3 1.85x
Gloucestershire 2 0.82x
Shropshire 1 0.93x
Somerset 1 0.50x
Surrey 1 0.17x
Sussex 1 0.48x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Islington London in Middlesex leads with 14 Pakemans recorded in 1881 and an index of 11.66x.

Place Total Index
Islington London 14 11.66x
Derby St Peter 11 177.99x
Coventry St Michael 9 89.73x
Swindon 8 94.12x
Bradley 5 2380.95x
Lee 5 81.43x
Norbury 5 2941.18x
Stapleford 5 367.65x
West Ham 5 9.26x
Aston 4 4.65x
Deptford St Paul 4 12.27x
Derby St Werburgh 4 35.71x
Hackney London 4 5.76x
Somersall Herbert 4 8000.00x
Twickenham 4 75.33x
Burton Upon Trent 3 30.67x
Claines 3 67.57x
Heston 3 72.99x
Over Darwen 3 25.55x
West Bromwich 3 12.53x
Newchurch 2 16.64x
Stoke Upon Trent 2 4.51x
Urmston 2 210.53x
Westbury On Trym 2 24.30x
Albrighton 1 192.31x
Biggin 1 2000.00x
Bishops Lydeard 1 196.08x
Chigwell 1 43.29x
Farley 1 500.00x
Gnosall 1 99.01x
Hastings St Mary In The 1 22.42x
Ireton Wood 1 2000.00x
Lewisham 1 4.44x
Mayfield 1 192.31x
Mickleover 1 166.67x
Reigate Foreign 1 15.29x
Solihull 1 44.44x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Pakeman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 8
Sarah 7
Elizabeth 5
Ann 3
Margaret 3
Annie 2
Augusta 2
Emily 2
Ethel 2
Hannah 2
Kate 2
Susannah 2
Alice 1
Amy 1
Anne 1
Beatrice 1
Blanche 1
C.B. 1
Catherine 1
Charlotte 1
Clara 1
Edith 1
Eleanor 1
Elisa 1
Eliza 1
Elizth. 1
Ellen 1
Emila 1
Esther 1
Florence 1
Frances 1
Gertrude 1
Harriet 1
Julia 1
Laura 1
Nelly 1
Pheobe 1
Susanah 1
Tessie 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Pakeman surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
George 8
John 8
William 6
Charles 4
Thomas 4
Frederick 3
Andrew 2
Edward 2
Edwin 2
Fredric 2
Henry 2
James 2
Joseph 2
Albert 1
Edd. 1
Frank 1
G.Wm. 1
Harry 1
Robert 1
Robt.Joshua 1
Samuel 1
Sidney 1
T.Henry 1
Thos. 1
Wm. 1
Wm.J. 1

FAQ

Pakeman surname: questions and answers

How common was the Pakeman surname in 1881?

In 1881, 127 people were recorded with the Pakeman surname. That placed it at #17,166 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Pakeman surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 79 in 2016. That gives Pakeman a modern rank of #33,100.

What does the Pakeman map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Pakeman bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.