NameCensus.

UK surname

Prike

In the 1881 census there were 133 people recorded with the Prike surname, ranking it #16,676 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 5, ranked #38,264, down from #16,676 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Barnham, Dalham and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Prike is 136 in 1851. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 96.2%.

1881 census count

133

Ranked #16,676

Modern count

5

2016, ranked #38,264

Peak year

1851

136 bearers

Map years

4

1851 to 1891

Key insights

  • Prike had 133 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #16,676 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 5 in 2016, ranked #38,264.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 136 in 1851.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Prike surname distribution map

The map shows where the Prike surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Prike surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Prike over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 136 #13,892
1861 historical 113 #19,151
1881 historical 133 #16,676
1891 historical 109 #22,701
1901 historical 49 #28,696
1911 historical 45 #28,332
1997 modern 11 #36,912
1998 modern 11 #36,908
1999 modern 11 #36,917
2000 modern 12 #36,749
2001 modern 11 #36,727
2002 modern 10 #36,902
2003 modern 9 #37,101
2004 modern 8 #37,346
2005 modern 8 #37,422
2006 modern 8 #37,481
2007 modern 7 #37,687
2008 modern 7 #37,735
2009 modern 8 #37,689
2010 modern 9 #37,654
2011 modern 8 #37,737
2012 modern 7 #37,854
2013 modern 7 #37,909
2014 modern 6 #38,077
2015 modern 5 #38,221
2016 modern 5 #38,264

Geography

Back to top

Where Prikes are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Barnham, Dalham, London parishes, Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon) and Combs, Little Finborough. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Barnham Norfolk
2 Dalham Cambridgeshire
3 London parishes London 3
4 Tynemouth (Chirton, Preston, Murton, Whitley, Monkseaton), Earsdon (Earsdon) Northumberland
5 Combs, Little Finborough Suffolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Prike

These lists show first names that appear often with the Prike surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Prike

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Prike, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Prike surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Prike household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Prike is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Prike is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Prike, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Prike families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Prike surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Suffolk leads with 79 Prikes recorded in 1881 and an index of 50.76x.

County Total Index
Suffolk 79 50.76x
Middlesex 15 1.17x
Essex 12 4.76x
Kent 5 1.15x
Lincolnshire 5 2.45x
Surrey 5 0.80x
Cambridgeshire 4 4.94x
Northumberland 4 2.10x
Sussex 1 0.46x
Yorkshire 1 0.08x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Combs in Suffolk leads with 12 Prikes recorded in 1881 and an index of 2307.69x.

Place Total Index
Combs 12 2307.69x
Enfield 10 119.33x
Colchester St Peter 9 891.09x
Gislingham 9 3750.00x
Dalham 8 4444.44x
Bury St Edmunds St James 6 144.23x
Ipswich St Clement 6 151.52x
Norton 6 1818.18x
Great Grimsby 5 38.55x
Ipswich St Margaret 5 94.70x
Pluckley 5 1250.00x
Stowmarket 5 277.78x
Bedlington 4 62.99x
Fordham 4 769.23x
Bermondsey 3 7.89x
Offton 3 2000.00x
Bulmer 2 666.67x
Bury St Edmunds St Mary 2 68.49x
Framlingham 2 181.82x
Friston 2 1176.47x
Mendlesham 2 408.16x
Newington 2 4.24x
Pinner 2 178.57x
Walsham Le Willows 2 384.62x
Chelsea London 1 2.60x
Elmsett 1 526.32x
Exning 1 126.58x
Great Ashfield 1 588.24x
Great Ayton 1 128.21x
Semer 1 666.67x
St Clement Danes 1 48.31x
Staines 1 49.51x
Stonham Earl 1 357.14x
Stoughton 1 370.37x
Stutton 1 416.67x
Sutton 1 400.00x
Wattisfield 1 476.19x
West Ham 1 1.80x
Westhorpe 1 1111.11x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Prike surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 8
Elizabeth 5
Emma 5
Eliza 4
Ada 3
Jane 3
Anna 2
Annie 2
Harriet 2
Isabella 2
Margerite 2
Minnie 2
Sophia 2
Ann 1
Caroline 1
Edith 1
Elizer 1
Emily 1
Esther 1
Florence 1
Hannah 1
Laura 1
Lilly 1
Lily 1
M. 1
Margrate 1
Maria 1
Maud 1
Pamala 1
Rachiel 1
Rosa 1
S. 1
Sarah 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Prike surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 10
George 6
John 5
Joseph 5
Harry 4
Robert 4
Thomas 4
Charles 3
James 3
Frederick 2
Henry 2
Luke 2
A. 1
Alfred 1
David 1
Edgar 1
Edward 1
Elijah 1
Ernest 1
Fredrick 1
Horace 1
Horrace 1
Hugh 1
Mark 1
Richard 1
Saml. 1
Samuel 1
Stephen 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Prike surname: questions and answers

How common was the Prike surname in 1881?

In 1881, 133 people were recorded with the Prike surname. That placed it at #16,676 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Prike surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 5 in 2016. That gives Prike a modern rank of #38,264.

What does the Prike map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Prike bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.