NameCensus.

UK surname

Reckless

In the 1881 census there were 97 people recorded with the Reckless surname, ranking it #20,127 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 110, ranked #29,225, down from #20,127 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Rawmarsh, Wath-on-Dearn (Swinton), Manchester and Clifton with Glapton. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Barnsley, Rochdale and Tameside.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Reckless is 149 in 2003. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 13.4%.

1881 census count

97

Ranked #20,127

Modern count

110

2016, ranked #29,225

Peak year

2003

149 bearers

Map years

5

1901 to 2016

Key insights

  • Reckless had 97 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #20,127 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 110 in 2016, ranked #29,225.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 146 in 1901.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Reckless surname distribution map

The map shows where the Reckless surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Reckless surname density by area, 2016 modern.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Reckless over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 67 #21,440
1861 historical 67 #25,342
1881 historical 97 #20,127
1891 historical 92 #25,109
1901 historical 146 #18,335
1911 historical 108 #21,736
1997 modern 144 #21,660
1998 modern 141 #22,517
1999 modern 142 #22,607
2000 modern 139 #22,855
2001 modern 135 #22,945
2002 modern 144 #22,501
2003 modern 149 #21,766
2004 modern 139 #22,891
2005 modern 139 #22,887
2006 modern 141 #22,833
2007 modern 137 #23,590
2008 modern 130 #24,695
2009 modern 137 #24,371
2010 modern 136 #25,009
2011 modern 134 #25,050
2012 modern 113 #28,016
2013 modern 110 #29,028
2014 modern 112 #28,934
2015 modern 110 #29,157
2016 modern 110 #29,225

Geography

Back to top

Where Reckless' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Rawmarsh, Wath-on-Dearn (Swinton), Manchester, Clifton with Glapton, Sheffield and Cubert. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Barnsley, Rochdale, Tameside, Plymouth and South Hams. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Rawmarsh, Wath-on-Dearn (Swinton) Yorkshire, West Riding
2 Manchester Lancashire
3 Clifton with Glapton Nottinghamshire
4 Sheffield Yorkshire, West Riding
5 Cubert Cornwall

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Barnsley 028 Barnsley
2 Rochdale 001 Rochdale
3 Tameside 027 Tameside
4 Plymouth 018 Plymouth
5 South Hams 005 South Hams

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Reckless

These lists show first names that appear often with the Reckless surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Reckless

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Reckless, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Reckless surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Reckless household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Reckless is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Reckless is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Reckless falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Reckless is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Reckless, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Reckless families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Reckless surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 34 Reckless' recorded in 1881 and an index of 3.63x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 34 3.63x
Lancashire 25 2.23x
Leicestershire 11 10.49x
Nottinghamshire 9 7.06x
Derbyshire 7 4.73x
Warwickshire 4 1.68x
Cambridgeshire 2 3.34x
Dorset 2 3.22x
Cornwall 1 0.93x
Kent 1 0.31x
Middlesex 1 0.11x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bury in Lancashire leads with 9 Reckless' recorded in 1881 and an index of 70.20x.

Place Total Index
Bury 9 70.20x
Rawmarsh 9 271.90x
Sheffield 9 30.16x
Clifton With Glapton 7 5833.33x
Ashborne 6 594.06x
Urmston 6 821.92x
Attercliffe Cum Darnall 5 57.27x
Aston 4 6.09x
Loughborough 4 84.03x
Ratby 4 754.72x
Salford 4 12.12x
Wath On Dearne 4 213.90x
Ecclesall Bierlow 3 15.73x
Newtown Linford 3 1875.00x
Pendleton In Salford 3 22.44x
Prestwich 3 107.14x
Hunslet 2 13.68x
Leeds 2 3.78x
Newmarket All Sts 2 454.55x
Thorncombe 2 555.56x
Dale Abbey 1 769.23x
Folkestone 1 15.97x
Nottingham St Mary 1 3.03x
Nottingham Standard 1 303.03x
Perranzabuloe 1 108.70x
St Pancras London 1 1.31x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Reckless surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 7
Mary 6
Sarah 5
Clara 3
Harriett 3
Ada 2
Ann 2
Annie 2
Emily 2
Emma 2
Ethel 2
Hannah 2
Kate 2
Alice 1
Annice 1
Beatrice 1
Catherine 1
Dora 1
Dorothy 1
Eliza 1
Ellen 1
Esther 1
Frances 1
Grace 1
Helena 1
Ida 1
Louisa 1
Maria 1
Milicent 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Reckless surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 7
William 5
Alfred 3
Arthur 3
Joseph 3
Walter 3
Ernest 2
Henry 2
Richard 2
Robert 2
Edward 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Frederick 1
George 1
Gervase 1
Joe 1
Philip 1
Sam 1

FAQ

Reckless surname: questions and answers

How common was the Reckless surname in 1881?

In 1881, 97 people were recorded with the Reckless surname. That placed it at #20,127 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Reckless surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 110 in 2016. That gives Reckless a modern rank of #29,225.

What does the Reckless map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Reckless bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.