NameCensus.

UK surname

Softly

In the 1881 census there were 191 people recorded with the Softly surname, ranking it #13,224 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 70, ranked #33,700, down from #13,224 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Westacre, Gateshead and Portsmouth, Portsea. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include No data.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Softly is 191 in 1881. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 63.4%.

1881 census count

191

Ranked #13,224

Modern count

70

2016, ranked #33,700

Peak year

1881

191 bearers

Map years

6

1851 to 1911

Key insights

  • Softly had 191 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,224 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 70 in 2016, ranked #33,700.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 191 in 1881.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is No data.

Softly surname distribution map

The map shows where the Softly surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Softly surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Softly over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 107 #16,402
1861 historical 112 #19,279
1881 historical 191 #13,224
1891 historical 156 #17,842
1901 historical 184 #15,942
1911 historical 122 #20,245
1997 modern 71 #30,521
1998 modern 72 #30,775
1999 modern 71 #31,036
2000 modern 67 #31,473
2001 modern 70 #31,016
2002 modern 75 #30,950
2003 modern 70 #31,486
2004 modern 69 #31,784
2005 modern 66 #32,303
2006 modern 62 #33,043
2007 modern 65 #33,045
2008 modern 62 #33,565
2009 modern 67 #33,450
2010 modern 67 #33,713
2011 modern 65 #33,842
2012 modern 66 #33,901
2013 modern 66 #34,003
2014 modern 70 #33,782
2015 modern 71 #33,666
2016 modern 70 #33,700

Geography

Back to top

Where Softlys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Westacre, Gateshead, Portsmouth, Portsea, Havant and Seaham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to No data. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Westacre Norfolk
2 Gateshead Durham
3 Portsmouth, Portsea Hampshire
4 Havant Hampshire
5 Seaham Durham

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 No data No data

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Softly

These lists show first names that appear often with the Softly surname in historical and recent records.

Recent female names

No Forenames Found

Recent male names

No Forenames Found

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Softly

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Softly, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Nationally, the Softly surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as No data, within No data. This does not mean every Softly household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

No data

Group

No data

Within London, Softly is most associated with areas classed as No data, part of No data. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Softly is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of No data.

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Softly, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Softly families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Softly surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Norfolk leads with 51 Softlys recorded in 1881 and an index of 17.90x.

County Total Index
Norfolk 51 17.90x
Durham 34 6.17x
Hampshire 33 8.69x
Middlesex 19 1.03x
Cambridgeshire 14 11.93x
Sussex 10 3.20x
Northumberland 8 2.90x
Lincolnshire 7 2.36x
Surrey 7 0.78x
Nottinghamshire 4 1.60x
Yorkshire 2 0.11x
Monmouthshire 1 0.75x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Portsea in Hampshire leads with 23 Softlys recorded in 1881 and an index of 30.89x.

Place Total Index
Portsea 23 30.89x
Westacre 16 6153.85x
Dersingham 11 1718.75x
Broadwater 10 139.47x
Bishopwearmouth 8 16.90x
Dawdon 7 103.24x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 7 29.31x
Manea 7 945.95x
Poplar London 6 17.15x
Tottenham 6 20.33x
Garvestone 5 2380.95x
Louth 5 73.64x
Portsmouth 5 57.14x
Thriplow 5 1724.14x
Camberwell 4 3.38x
Islington London 4 2.23x
Kirkby In Ashfield 4 149.81x
Southwick 4 76.63x
Westfield 4 5714.29x
Alverstoke 3 21.82x
Beeston With Bittering 3 937.50x
Elswick 3 13.63x
Gayton 3 625.00x
Kings Lynn St Margaret 3 35.09x
Norwich St Peter 3 160.43x
St Pancras London 3 2.01x
Westgate 3 17.56x
Chester Le Street 2 47.28x
Gateshead 2 4.85x
Guisbrough 2 49.88x
Haslemere 2 281.69x
St Andrewthe Less 2 14.91x
Westoe 2 6.40x
Barnard Castle 1 36.63x
Barton St Mary 1 67.11x
Brancaster 1 204.08x
Chirton 1 16.03x
Havant 1 52.08x
Holbeach 1 30.30x
Jesmond 1 25.77x
Newport 1 15.65x
Ryde 1 12.25x
Stoke 1 23.47x
Sunderland 1 10.27x
West Lynn 1 270.27x
Wiggenhall St German 1 294.12x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Softly surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Softly surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 16
John 15
George 7
James 7
Thomas 6
Alfred 5
Henry 5
Walter 4
Charles 3
Robert 3
Samuel 3
Edwin 2
Richard 2
Wm. 2
Arthur 1
Edgar 1
Ernest 1
Frank 1
Fred 1
Frederic 1
Fredk 1
Fredk. 1
Harry 1
Horace 1
Joseph 1
Michael 1
Michal 1
Roland 1
Stephen 1
Willm.M. 1

FAQ

Softly surname: questions and answers

How common was the Softly surname in 1881?

In 1881, 191 people were recorded with the Softly surname. That placed it at #13,224 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Softly surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 70 in 2016. That gives Softly a modern rank of #33,700.

What does the Softly map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Softly bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.