NameCensus.

UK surname

Spendlove

A surname potentially derived from spending money freely or extravagantly on love interests.

In the 1881 census there were 460 people recorded with the Spendlove surname, ranking it #7,211 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 677, ranked #7,926, down from #7,211 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to St Peter, Duffield and London parishes. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Amber Valley, South Derbyshire and Wakefield.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Spendlove is 710 in 2000. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 47.2%.

1881 census count

460

Ranked #7,211

Modern count

677

2016, ranked #7,926

Peak year

2000

710 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Spendlove had 460 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #7,211 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 677 in 2016, ranked #7,926.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 681 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Spendlove surname distribution map

The map shows where the Spendlove surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Spendlove surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Spendlove over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 327 #7,119
1861 historical 291 #8,653
1881 historical 460 #7,211
1891 historical 520 #7,194
1901 historical 650 #6,642
1911 historical 681 #6,206
1997 modern 662 #7,571
1998 modern 693 #7,538
1999 modern 703 #7,488
2000 modern 710 #7,412
2001 modern 689 #7,461
2002 modern 693 #7,574
2003 modern 674 #7,621
2004 modern 673 #7,643
2005 modern 658 #7,701
2006 modern 647 #7,829
2007 modern 661 #7,764
2008 modern 658 #7,843
2009 modern 673 #7,876
2010 modern 681 #7,943
2011 modern 671 #7,954
2012 modern 649 #8,084
2013 modern 679 #7,929
2014 modern 687 #7,893
2015 modern 676 #7,943
2016 modern 677 #7,926

Geography

Back to top

Where Spendloves are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around St Peter, Duffield, London parishes, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard and Gretton. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Amber Valley, South Derbyshire, Wakefield and Kettering. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 St Peter Derbyshire
2 Duffield Derbyshire
3 London parishes London 1
4 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
5 Gretton Rutland

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Amber Valley 007 Amber Valley
2 South Derbyshire 001 South Derbyshire
3 Amber Valley 006 Amber Valley
4 Wakefield 043 Wakefield
5 Kettering 003 Kettering

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Spendlove

These lists show first names that appear often with the Spendlove surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Spendlove

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Spendlove, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Spendlove surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Spendlove household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Spendlove is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Spendlove is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Spendlove falls in decile 9 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

9
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Spendlove is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Spendlove, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

Meaning and origin of Spendlove

The surname Spendlove is believed to have originated in England during the late medieval period, likely emerging in the 13th or 14th century. It is thought to be a locational name, derived from a place name that no longer exists or has been lost to history. Some scholars suggest it may have been a combination of the Old English words "spend" (meaning to spend or expend) and "luf" (meaning love or affection), potentially referring to a person's generosity or open-heartedness.

One of the earliest recorded instances of the Spendlove surname appears in the Pipe Rolls of Yorkshire from the year 1379, where a John Spendlove is mentioned as a taxpayer. The name is also found in various parish records and legal documents from the 15th and 16th centuries, with variations in spelling such as Spendluff, Spendlove, and Spendluff.

Notably, the Spendlove name appears in the renowned Domesday Book, a comprehensive record of landholdings and population surveys conducted in 1086 under the order of William the Conqueror. This entry suggests that the surname had already been established by the late 11th century.

Among the notable individuals bearing the Spendlove surname throughout history are Sir John Spendlove (c. 1490-1557), a prominent English politician and landowner who served as a Member of Parliament during the reigns of Henry VIII and Edward VI. Another figure of note is Richard Spendlove (1670-1733), an English clergyman and academic who served as the Master of Pembroke College, Cambridge.

In the 18th century, we find John Spendlove (1740-1815), a respected English artist known for his skilled landscape paintings and portraits. Additionally, there is William Spendlove (1807-1885), a British architect who designed several notable buildings in London and the surrounding areas.

Moving into the 19th century, we encounter Mary Spendlove (1829-1901), an English philanthropist and social reformer who dedicated her life to improving the living conditions and educational opportunities for underprivileged children in London's East End.

These are just a few examples of individuals who have carried the Spendlove surname throughout the centuries, each contributing to various fields and leaving their mark on history.

Sourced from namecensus.com.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Spendlove families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Spendlove surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Derbyshire leads with 159 Spendloves recorded in 1881 and an index of 22.63x.

County Total Index
Derbyshire 159 22.63x
Northamptonshire 65 15.40x
Shropshire 40 10.32x
Nottinghamshire 37 6.12x
Middlesex 33 0.74x
Norfolk 18 2.61x
Yorkshire 18 0.40x
Lancashire 15 0.28x
Warwickshire 15 1.33x
Surrey 14 0.64x
Staffordshire 10 0.66x
Kent 8 0.52x
Leicestershire 7 1.41x
Lincolnshire 5 0.70x
Bedfordshire 4 1.72x
Hampshire 3 0.33x
Worcestershire 2 0.34x
Caernarfonshire 1 0.55x
Cardiganshire 1 0.91x
Essex 1 0.11x
Hertfordshire 1 0.32x
Rutland 1 3.03x
Suffolk 1 0.18x
Sussex 1 0.13x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Madeley in Shropshire leads with 33 Spendloves recorded in 1881 and an index of 232.23x.

Place Total Index
Madeley 33 232.23x
Gretton 20 1562.50x
Belper 18 132.16x
Derby St Peter 17 75.96x
Normanton 13 219.22x
Basford 12 43.04x
Shottle Postern 12 3000.00x
Duffield 11 198.56x
Little Weldon 10 1428.57x
Birmingham 9 2.39x
Brandon 9 242.59x
Hazelwood 9 1551.72x
Tansley 9 865.38x
Warmington 9 849.06x
Ackworth 8 233.92x
Snenton 8 33.67x
St Marylebone London 8 3.34x
Westminster St 8 48.37x
Alfreton 7 32.80x
Kensington London 7 2.81x
Alderwasley 6 1016.95x
Ashleyhay 6 1818.18x
Derby St Werburgh 6 14.79x
Gorton 6 11.99x
Lenton 6 42.11x
Sandiacre 6 239.04x
Wandsworth 6 13.89x
Wimbledon 6 24.44x
Aston 5 1.60x
Bulwick 5 1000.00x
Nottingham Standard 5 322.58x
Rothwell 5 117.92x
St George Hanover 5 8.54x
Whittington 5 51.44x
Breaston 4 322.58x
Derby St Alkmund 4 19.00x
Great Easton 4 481.93x
Leighton Buzzard 4 40.04x
Long Eaton 4 43.15x
Peterborough 4 13.09x
Sheriff Hales 4 258.06x
Thornton In Bradford 4 27.03x
Whiston 4 186.92x
Armitage 3 152.28x
Dawley 3 21.26x
Deptford St Paul 3 2.54x
Frindsbury 3 51.99x
Great Yarmouth 3 5.25x
Hasland 3 41.96x
Ireton Wood 3 1666.67x
Quarndon 3 352.94x
Ripley 3 34.56x
Willingham 3 422.54x
Arnold 2 22.65x
Barton Under Needwood 2 72.73x
Benefield 2 277.78x
Christchurch 2 10.03x
Handsworth 2 5.36x
Hugglescote 2 27.32x
Ilkeston 2 10.15x
Kidderminster Borough 2 5.83x
Kirk Langley 2 192.31x
Lyng 2 256.41x
Mile End Old Town 2 2.82x
Morley 2 465.12x
Norwich St Clement 2 25.00x
Nottingham St Peter 2 29.67x
Polebrook 2 289.86x
Radcliffe 2 7.79x
Spondon 2 74.07x
Sudborough 2 454.55x
Thetford St Mary 2 106.38x
Toxteth Park 2 1.11x
Westminster St John 2 3.66x
Woodnewton 2 273.97x
Broughton In Salford 1 2.05x
Crich 1 21.83x
Everton 1 0.59x
Kennington 1 87.72x
Stamford St Michael 1 49.02x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Spendlove surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 33
Sarah 18
Elizabeth 13
Eliza 11
Emma 11
Ann 10
Hannah 9
Ellen 7
Emily 7
Lucy 7
Harriet 6
Margaret 5
Maria 5
Annie 4
Charlotte 3
Edith 3
Frances 3
Gertrude 3
Harriett 3
Kate 3
Martha 3
Ruth 3
Ada 2
Alice 2
Anne 2
Beatrice 2
Caroline 2
Catharine 2
Catherine 2
Dinah 2
Jane 2
Julia 2
Louisa 2
Lydia 2
Phillis 2
Sophia 2
Betsy 1
Blansh 1
C.I. 1
Eliza. 1
Elzth. 1
Fanny 1
Florence 1
Helena 1
Isabella 1
Jany 1
Jemima 1
Lilly 1
Lily 1
Lois 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Spendlove surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 40
William 31
George 21
Joseph 15
Thomas 13
James 11
Robert 11
Job 7
Edward 6
Henry 6
Charles 5
Frederick 5
Richard 4
Samuel 4
Albert 3
Anthony 3
Andrew 2
Arthur 2
Ernest 2
Frank 2
Herbert 2
Jonathan 2
Raymond 2
Wm. 2
Alfred 1
Aurther 1
Bamford 1
Charley 1
David 1
Ebenezer 1
Edmund 1
Edwin 1
Enoch 1
Fred 1
Fredk. 1
Gervase 1
Harry 1
Isaac 1
Johnathan 1
Nelson 1
Sml. 1
Stephen 1
Tom 1
Walter 1
Willm. 1
Willoughby 1

FAQ

Spendlove surname: questions and answers

How common was the Spendlove surname in 1881?

In 1881, 460 people were recorded with the Spendlove surname. That placed it at #7,211 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Spendlove surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 677 in 2016. That gives Spendlove a modern rank of #7,926.

What does the Spendlove surname mean?

A surname potentially derived from spending money freely or extravagantly on love interests.

What does the Spendlove map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Spendlove bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.