NameCensus.

UK surname

Sweetlove

In the 1881 census there were 177 people recorded with the Sweetlove surname, ranking it #13,889 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 118, ranked #27,873, down from #13,889 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Greenwich, Rochester and Winwick. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Wiltshire, Cornwall and Brentwood.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Sweetlove is 180 in 1891. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 33.3%.

1881 census count

177

Ranked #13,889

Modern count

118

2016, ranked #27,873

Peak year

1891

180 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Sweetlove had 177 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,889 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 118 in 2016, ranked #27,873.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 180 in 1891.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Sweetlove surname distribution map

The map shows where the Sweetlove surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Sweetlove surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Sweetlove over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 142 #13,428
1861 historical 120 #18,255
1881 historical 177 #13,889
1891 historical 180 #16,143
1901 historical 175 #16,469
1911 historical 145 #18,255
1997 modern 133 #22,705
1998 modern 130 #23,603
1999 modern 140 #22,789
2000 modern 140 #22,752
2001 modern 137 #22,740
2002 modern 138 #23,094
2003 modern 128 #23,890
2004 modern 121 #24,939
2005 modern 115 #25,702
2006 modern 114 #26,120
2007 modern 111 #26,954
2008 modern 111 #27,225
2009 modern 122 #26,220
2010 modern 118 #27,404
2011 modern 122 #26,647
2012 modern 116 #27,550
2013 modern 114 #28,347
2014 modern 117 #28,109
2015 modern 120 #27,561
2016 modern 118 #27,873

Geography

Back to top

Where Sweetloves are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Greenwich, Rochester, Winwick, London parishes and St Mary Islington. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Wiltshire, Cornwall, Brentwood and North Hertfordshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Greenwich London (South Districts)
2 Rochester Kent
3 Winwick Lancashire
4 London parishes London 3
5 St Mary Islington London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Wiltshire 015 Wiltshire
2 Wiltshire 016 Wiltshire
3 Cornwall 014 Cornwall
4 Brentwood 009 Brentwood
5 North Hertfordshire 004 North Hertfordshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Sweetlove

These lists show first names that appear often with the Sweetlove surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Sweetlove

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Sweetlove, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Sweetlove surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Sweetlove household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Sweetlove is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Sweetlove is most concentrated in decile 9 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

9
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Sweetlove falls in decile 5 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

5
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Sweetlove is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Sweetlove, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Sweetlove families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Sweetlove surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 66 Sweetloves recorded in 1881 and an index of 11.53x.

County Total Index
Kent 66 11.53x
Lancashire 40 2.01x
Middlesex 35 2.09x
Surrey 13 1.59x
Hampshire 9 2.62x
Sussex 4 1.41x
Royal Navy 2 10.01x
Devon 1 0.29x
Gloucestershire 1 0.30x
Yorkshire 1 0.06x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Greenwich in Kent leads with 21 Sweetloves recorded in 1881 and an index of 78.62x.

Place Total Index
Greenwich 21 78.62x
Islington London 15 9.22x
Rochester St Margaret 11 182.12x
Bromley 8 91.74x
Great Bolton 8 30.34x
Newton In Makerfield 8 131.15x
Shoreditch London 7 9.62x
Sutton 7 104.79x
Croydon 6 13.22x
Cobham 5 373.13x
Grange Gillingham 5 2000.00x
Little Bolton 5 19.53x
Southampton All Sts 5 84.75x
Winwick With Hulme 5 1785.71x
Canterbury St Alphage 4 655.74x
Charing 4 519.48x
Chelsea London 4 7.91x
Lewisham 3 9.83x
Lowton 3 222.22x
Tonbridge 3 14.53x
Chatham 2 12.70x
Christchurch 2 26.81x
Hastings All Sts 2 74.91x
Paddington London 2 3.24x
Royal Navy 2 11.70x
Staines 2 75.19x
Subdeanery 2 93.02x
Westminster St John 2 9.79x
Coberley 1 526.32x
Deptford St Paul 1 2.27x
East Farleigh 1 104.17x
Farnworth 1 8.38x
Hampstead London 1 3.83x
Leeds 1 238.10x
Lingfield 1 62.89x
Lymington 1 39.53x
Maidstone 1 5.87x
Middle Hulton 1 84.75x
Minster In Sheppey 1 10.55x
North Meols 1 5.13x
Portsea 1 1.48x
Sculcoates 1 3.79x
St Andrew Holborn 1 17.57x
St George Hanover 1 4.57x
Stoke Damerel 1 4.09x
Tyldesley Cum Shakerley 1 17.45x
West Horsley 1 294.12x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Sweetlove surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Sweetlove surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 11
John 10
Thomas 8
James 6
Charles 4
George 4
Robert 4
Henry 3
Edward 2
Adolphe 1
Albert 1
Arthur 1
Fredk. 1
Harry 1
Heny.Charles 1
Jos. 1
Joseph 1
Leonard 1
Merton 1
Samuel 1
Simmonds 1
Simmons 1
Symnond 1
Thos. 1
W. 1
Wallace 1
Willie 1

FAQ

Sweetlove surname: questions and answers

How common was the Sweetlove surname in 1881?

In 1881, 177 people were recorded with the Sweetlove surname. That placed it at #13,889 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Sweetlove surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 118 in 2016. That gives Sweetlove a modern rank of #27,873.

What does the Sweetlove map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Sweetlove bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.