NameCensus.

UK surname

Waterer

In the 1881 census there were 187 people recorded with the Waterer surname, ranking it #13,407 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 193, ranked #20,039, down from #13,407 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Chertsey and Woking. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Waveney, Elmbridge and Winchester.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Waterer is 269 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 3.2%.

1881 census count

187

Ranked #13,407

Modern count

193

2016, ranked #20,039

Peak year

1911

269 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Waterer had 187 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,407 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 193 in 2016, ranked #20,039.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 269 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Spacious Rural Living.

Waterer surname distribution map

The map shows where the Waterer surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Waterer surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Waterer over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 146 #13,157
1861 historical 137 #16,465
1881 historical 187 #13,407
1891 historical 243 #13,011
1901 historical 261 #12,775
1911 historical 269 #12,300
1997 modern 208 #17,219
1998 modern 217 #17,207
1999 modern 229 #16,744
2000 modern 229 #16,695
2001 modern 216 #17,103
2002 modern 209 #17,803
2003 modern 201 #18,089
2004 modern 200 #18,213
2005 modern 193 #18,572
2006 modern 198 #18,425
2007 modern 198 #18,600
2008 modern 198 #18,753
2009 modern 199 #19,090
2010 modern 209 #18,893
2011 modern 201 #19,213
2012 modern 192 #19,730
2013 modern 189 #20,273
2014 modern 196 #19,961
2015 modern 194 #19,994
2016 modern 193 #20,039

Geography

Back to top

Where Waterers are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Chertsey, Woking and Lytham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Waveney, Elmbridge, Winchester, Braintree and Coventry. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Chertsey Surrey
3 Woking Surrey
4 London parishes London 3
5 Lytham Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Waveney 007 Waveney
2 Elmbridge 017 Elmbridge
3 Winchester 004 Winchester
4 Braintree 003 Braintree
5 Coventry 036 Coventry

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Waterer

These lists show first names that appear often with the Waterer surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Waterer

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Waterer, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Retired Professionals

Group

Spacious Rural Living

Nationally, the Waterer surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Spacious Rural Living, within Retired Professionals. This does not mean every Waterer household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These predominantly ageing households typically have no resident dependent children. Most are owner-occupiers and live in detached houses in low density residential developments (although renting is more common than in the rest of the Supergroup). White ethnicity predominates. Residents are typically beyond retirement age but those still in work have managerial, professional or skilled trade occupations. White ethnicity and Christian religious affiliation predominate. Neighbourhoods are located throughout rural UK.

Wider pattern

Typically married but no longer with resident dependent children, these well-educated households either remain working in their managerial, professional, administrative or other skilled occupations, or are retired from them – the modal individual age is beyond normal retirement age. Underoccupied detached and semi-detached properties predominate, and unpaid care is more prevalent than reported disability. The prevalence of this Supergroup outside most urban conurbations indicates that rural lifestyles prevail, typically sustained by using two or more cars per household.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Waterer is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Waterer is most concentrated in decile 3 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

3
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Waterer falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Waterer is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Waterer, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Waterer families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Waterer surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Surrey leads with 109 Waterers recorded in 1881 and an index of 12.26x.

County Total Index
Surrey 109 12.26x
Middlesex 44 2.41x
Hampshire 12 3.21x
Lancashire 7 0.32x
Devon 5 1.32x
Gloucestershire 2 0.56x
Berkshire 1 0.73x
Buckinghamshire 1 0.91x
Essex 1 0.28x
Glamorgan 1 0.31x
Kent 1 0.16x
Nottinghamshire 1 0.41x
Sussex 1 0.33x
Wiltshire 1 0.62x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Windlesham in Surrey leads with 20 Waterers recorded in 1881 and an index of 1197.60x.

Place Total Index
Windlesham 20 1197.60x
Chertsey 14 243.90x
St Peter Cheesehill 12 2264.15x
Epsom 11 254.04x
Mile End Old Town 11 38.21x
Edmonton 10 68.03x
Clapham 7 30.70x
Chelsea London 6 10.92x
Lytham 6 181.82x
Woking 6 111.94x
Battersea 5 7.45x
Bermondsey 5 9.21x
Hackney London 5 4.89x
Lambeth 5 3.14x
Mickleham 5 1000.00x
Milton Abbott 5 909.09x
Cobham 4 273.97x
Horsell 4 714.29x
Leatherhead 4 179.37x
St Botolph Aldgate 4 160.64x
Buckland 3 1153.85x
Newington 3 4.45x
Rotherhithe 3 13.31x
St Pancras London 3 2.04x
Sutton 3 46.66x
Betchworth 2 181.82x
Fulham London 2 7.56x
Guildford St Mary 2 183.49x
Islington London 2 1.13x
Ockham 2 588.24x
Barrowford Booth 1 41.67x
Bromley 1 10.54x
Cirencester 1 20.66x
Clayton 1 86.21x
Hornchurch 1 56.50x
Newcastle Higher 1 46.30x
Nottingham St Mary 1 1.57x
Preshute 1 101.01x
Stonehouse 1 49.26x
Sunninghill 1 52.63x
Tottenham 1 3.44x
Upton Cum Chalvey 1 22.78x
Wandsworth 1 5.69x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Waterer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Waterer surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Joseph 10
John 7
Henry 6
Charles 5
George 5
William 5
Richard 4
James 3
Michael 3
Percy 3
Walter 3
Anthony 2
Edward 2
R. 2
Robert 2
Stephen 2
Albert 1
Alfred 1
Alphonso 1
Bearly 1
Ben 1
Benj.S. 1
C. 1
Clarence 1
Claude 1
Corriggio 1
Edwin 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
Geo. 1
Harry 1
J. 1
Nicholas 1
Peter 1
Philip 1
Ralph 1
Reubin 1
Samuel 1
Sarah 1
Thos. 1

FAQ

Waterer surname: questions and answers

How common was the Waterer surname in 1881?

In 1881, 187 people were recorded with the Waterer surname. That placed it at #13,407 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Waterer surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 193 in 2016. That gives Waterer a modern rank of #20,039.

What does the Waterer map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Waterer bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.