NameCensus.

UK surname

Whybrow

In the 1881 census there were 591 people recorded with the Whybrow surname, ranking it #5,910 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 1,082, ranked #5,400, up from #5,910 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Willingham and Haverhill, Little Wratting. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Rotherham, Dartford and Bedford.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Whybrow is 1,196 in 2002. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 83.1%.

1881 census count

591

Ranked #5,910

Modern count

1,082

2016, ranked #5,400

Peak year

2002

1,196 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Whybrow had 591 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #5,910 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 1,082 in 2016, ranked #5,400.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 1,144 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Whybrow surname distribution map

The map shows where the Whybrow surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Whybrow surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Whybrow over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 330 #7,062
1861 historical 295 #8,555
1881 historical 591 #5,910
1891 historical 674 #5,786
1901 historical 974 #4,855
1911 historical 1,144 #4,082
1997 modern 1,113 #5,016
1998 modern 1,128 #5,143
1999 modern 1,165 #5,054
2000 modern 1,176 #4,990
2001 modern 1,143 #5,016
2002 modern 1,196 #4,918
2003 modern 1,135 #5,044
2004 modern 1,111 #5,142
2005 modern 1,052 #5,323
2006 modern 1,040 #5,397
2007 modern 1,046 #5,412
2008 modern 1,051 #5,428
2009 modern 1,080 #5,405
2010 modern 1,103 #5,420
2011 modern 1,113 #5,323
2012 modern 1,106 #5,265
2013 modern 1,103 #5,358
2014 modern 1,105 #5,375
2015 modern 1,090 #5,387
2016 modern 1,082 #5,400

Geography

Back to top

Where Whybrows are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Willingham, Haverhill, Little Wratting and Chelmsford, Broomfield, Writtle, Widford, Chignal St James, Chignal Smealy. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Rotherham, Dartford, Bedford, Welwyn Hatfield and Colchester. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 1
2 Willingham Cambridgeshire
3 London parishes London 3
4 Haverhill, Little Wratting Suffolk
5 Chelmsford, Broomfield, Writtle, Widford, Chignal St James, Chignal Smealy Essex

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Rotherham 011 Rotherham
2 Dartford 001 Dartford
3 Bedford 019 Bedford
4 Welwyn Hatfield 007 Welwyn Hatfield
5 Colchester 002 Colchester

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Whybrow

These lists show first names that appear often with the Whybrow surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Whybrow

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Whybrow, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Whybrow surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Whybrow household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Young Families and Mainstream Employment

Group

Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs

Within London, Whybrow is most associated with areas classed as Terraced and Semi-Detached Suburbs, part of Young Families and Mainstream Employment. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly concentrated in suburban areas, these terraced and semi-detached developments are less overcrowded than the Supergroup average, and resident households are more likely to own two or more cars. There are fewer residents aged 25-44, and a larger share of residents employed in administrative and secretarial occupations. Residents are more likely to have been born in the UK, less likely to have been born in the EU or Africa, and much less likely to self-identify as Bangladeshi.

Wider London pattern

Many families in these neighbourhoods have young children. Housing is principally in the social rented sector, in terraced or semi-detached units. While over-all residential densities are low, overcrowding is also prevalent locally. Residents are drawn from a range of ethnic minorities, with many identifying as Black and above average numbers born in Africa. Numbers identifying as of Chinese, Indian or White ethnicity are below average. Levels of proficiency in English are below average. Levels of separation or divorce and incidence of disability are both above average. Education is typically limited to Level 1, 2, or apprenticeship qualifications. Few residents work in professional or managerial occupations but the employment structure is otherwise diverse: it includes skilled trades, caring, leisure and other service occupations, sales and customer service occupations, construction, and work as process, plant, and machine operatives.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Whybrow is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Whybrow falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Whybrow is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Whybrow, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Whybrow families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Whybrow surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Essex leads with 145 Whybrows recorded in 1881 and an index of 12.92x.

County Total Index
Essex 145 12.92x
Middlesex 101 1.78x
Cambridgeshire 84 23.32x
Kent 76 3.92x
Surrey 57 2.06x
Suffolk 39 5.63x
Yorkshire 26 0.46x
Norfolk 13 1.49x
Devon 11 0.93x
Derbyshire 6 0.67x
Nottinghamshire 6 0.78x
Cumberland 5 1.02x
Sussex 5 0.52x
Hampshire 3 0.26x
Huntingdonshire 2 1.77x
Lancashire 2 0.03x
Durham 1 0.06x
Warwickshire 1 0.07x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Woolwich in Kent leads with 33 Whybrows recorded in 1881 and an index of 46.03x.

Place Total Index
Woolwich 33 46.03x
Croydon 29 18.85x
Willingham 28 909.09x
Over 24 1121.50x
Great Dunmow 19 324.79x
Haverhill 19 308.94x
Birch 15 815.22x
Mile End Old Town 15 16.71x
West Ham 14 5.65x
Bradwell By Coggleshall 13 2653.06x
Chelmsford 13 67.50x
Paddington London 13 6.22x
Maidstone 12 20.76x
Belchamp St Paul 10 724.64x
Bideford 10 78.86x
Hackney London 10 3.14x
Downham Market 9 149.75x
Prittlewell 9 57.84x
Risby 9 1046.51x
Saddleworth 9 20.70x
St Pancras London 9 1.97x
Clerkenwell London 8 5.96x
Dartford 8 40.32x
Bromley 7 23.67x
Hauxton 7 1400.00x
Bethnal Green London 6 2.43x
Brightside Bierlow 6 5.43x
Camberwell 6 1.65x
Greenwich 6 6.63x
Litchurch 6 16.75x
Newark Upon Trent 6 21.78x
Southwark St George Martyr 6 5.24x
St Andrewthe Less 6 14.58x
Sudbury St Gregory 6 108.11x
Sutton 6 2142.86x
Chesterton 5 45.00x
Ealing 5 9.84x
St Mary Within 5 81.70x
Willesden 5 9.33x
Canewdon 4 285.71x
Chertsey 4 22.33x
Colchester St Martin 4 195.12x
Deptford St Paul 4 2.67x
Great Burstead 4 97.80x
Ipswich St Peter 4 42.92x
Kensington London 4 1.27x
Lambeth 4 0.81x
Sculcoates 4 4.48x
Sheffield 4 2.23x
South Ockendon 4 172.41x
St Luke London 4 4.39x
St Marythe Less 4 182.65x
Tottenham 4 4.42x
Colchester St Leonard 3 83.10x
Penge 3 8.26x
St George Hanover 3 4.04x
Stow Bardolph 3 115.38x
Bluntisham 2 94.34x
Broadwater 2 9.10x
Chigwell 2 18.87x
Colchester St Botolph 2 20.94x
East Bedfont 2 70.92x
Farnborough 2 16.34x
Gosfield 2 168.07x
Halstead 2 15.27x
Holy Trinity Cambridge 2 51.15x
Islington London 2 0.36x
Lee 2 7.10x
Leyton Low 2 8.76x
Oldham 2 0.92x
Southminster 2 81.30x
St Giles Cripplegate 2 26.49x
St Marylebone London 2 0.66x
Stanway 2 101.52x
Stoke Newington London 2 4.51x
Sutton 2 66.89x
Hove 1 2.38x
St Benet Pauls Wharf 1 555.56x
Waltham Holy Cross 1 9.53x
Wortley In Bramley 1 2.24x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Whybrow surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Sarah 26
Mary 23
Elizabeth 20
Eliza 15
Emma 14
Alice 13
Ellen 13
Emily 13
Ann 10
Jane 10
Annie 9
Louisa 7
Harriet 6
Amy 5
Florence 5
Rebecca 5
Anne 4
Caroline 4
Edith 4
Susan 4
Anna 3
Catherine 3
Celia 3
Fanny 3
Flora 3
Hannah 3
Lily 3
Lydia 3
Martha 3
Minnie 3
Rose 3
Amelia 2
Beatrice 2
Clara 2
Ethel 2
Harriett 2
Julia 2
Lilly 2
Lois 2
Lucy 2
Priscilla 2
Susannah 2
Bett 1
Bridget 1
Broke 1
Elvina 1
Esther 1
Evelina 1
Kate 1
Winifred 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Whybrow surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 43
George 27
James 25
Thomas 20
John 19
Charles 17
Henry 17
Arthur 14
Alfred 7
Frederick 7
Walter 7
Joseph 6
Harry 5
Herbert 4
Samuel 4
Albert 3
Edward 3
Ernest 3
Isaac 3
Richard 3
Robert 3
Edwin 2
Francis 2
Jas. 2
Solomon 2
Thos. 2
Benson 1
Brittan 1
Chas. 1
Daniel 1
David 1
Earnest 1
Ebenezer 1
Ephraim 1
Fred. 1
Geo. 1
Ingle 1
Jacob 1
Jonas 1
Norman 1
Peter 1
Philip 1
Robt. 1
Sam 1
Saml.Wm. 1
Sidney 1
Silas 1
Stephen 1
Sydney 1
Tom 1

FAQ

Whybrow surname: questions and answers

How common was the Whybrow surname in 1881?

In 1881, 591 people were recorded with the Whybrow surname. That placed it at #5,910 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Whybrow surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 1,082 in 2016. That gives Whybrow a modern rank of #5,400.

What does the Whybrow map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Whybrow bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.