NameCensus.

UK surname

Whymark

In the 1881 census there were 226 people recorded with the Whymark surname, ranking it #11,889 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 548, ranked #9,309, up from #11,889 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to London parishes, Great Waldingfield, Acton and Lindsey. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Babergh, Colchester and Brentwood.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Whymark is 586 in 2013. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 142.5%.

1881 census count

226

Ranked #11,889

Modern count

548

2016, ranked #9,309

Peak year

2013

586 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Whymark had 226 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,889 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 548 in 2016, ranked #9,309.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 400 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Whymark surname distribution map

The map shows where the Whymark surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Whymark surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Whymark over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 132 #14,174
1861 historical 106 #20,147
1881 historical 226 #11,889
1891 historical 292 #11,351
1901 historical 346 #10,516
1911 historical 400 #9,280
1997 modern 538 #8,815
1998 modern 554 #8,876
1999 modern 562 #8,825
2000 modern 568 #8,717
2001 modern 544 #8,875
2002 modern 568 #8,764
2003 modern 547 #8,872
2004 modern 558 #8,775
2005 modern 531 #9,034
2006 modern 545 #8,875
2007 modern 542 #8,991
2008 modern 549 #8,978
2009 modern 558 #9,066
2010 modern 573 #9,073
2011 modern 566 #9,070
2012 modern 568 #8,958
2013 modern 586 #8,883
2014 modern 577 #9,047
2015 modern 568 #9,068
2016 modern 548 #9,309

Geography

Back to top

Where Whymarks are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around London parishes, Great Waldingfield, Acton, Lindsey, Ipswich St Mary Stoke and Edwardstone. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Babergh, Colchester and Brentwood. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 London parishes London 3
2 Great Waldingfield, Acton Suffolk
3 Lindsey Suffolk
4 Ipswich St Mary Stoke Suffolk
5 Edwardstone Suffolk

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Babergh 009 Babergh
2 Babergh 007 Babergh
3 Colchester 017 Colchester
4 Babergh 004 Babergh
5 Brentwood 003 Brentwood

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Whymark

These lists show first names that appear often with the Whymark surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Whymark

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Whymark, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Whymark surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Whymark household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Whymark is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Whymark is most concentrated in decile 7 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

7
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Whymark falls in decile 6 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname near the middle of the scale.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

6
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Whymark is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Whymark, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Whymark families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Whymark surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Suffolk leads with 131 Whymarks recorded in 1881 and an index of 48.79x.

County Total Index
Suffolk 131 48.79x
Surrey 18 1.68x
Essex 14 3.22x
Kent 12 1.60x
Sussex 12 3.23x
Middlesex 9 0.41x
Warwickshire 7 1.26x
Gloucestershire 6 1.39x
Yorkshire 5 0.23x
Derbyshire 4 1.16x
Durham 3 0.46x
Northumberland 2 0.61x
Hampshire 1 0.22x
Shropshire 1 0.53x
Staffordshire 1 0.13x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Hadleigh in Suffolk leads with 17 Whymarks recorded in 1881 and an index of 653.85x.

Place Total Index
Hadleigh 17 653.85x
Little Cornard 12 4137.93x
Assington 11 1964.29x
Deptford St Paul 11 18.96x
Lindsey 11 6470.59x
Brettenham 9 3750.00x
Camberwell 9 6.39x
Ipswich St Margaret 9 98.79x
Leamington Priors 7 51.17x
Bristol St Paul In 6 52.08x
Edwardstone 6 1818.18x
Hartest 6 1304.35x
Pakefield 6 895.52x
Raydon 6 1500.00x
Baildon 5 121.65x
Great Waldingfield 5 1136.36x
Groton 5 1428.57x
Ipswich St Clement 5 73.21x
Rawreth 5 2000.00x
Stoke By Nayland 5 574.71x
Westdean 5 5000.00x
Wivenhoe 5 289.02x
Darley 4 287.77x
Hastings St Mary In The 4 50.44x
Southwark Christchurch 4 38.72x
Croydon 3 5.03x
Gateshead 3 6.11x
Ipswich St Peter 3 83.10x
Kersey 3 810.81x
Paddington London 3 3.70x
St George In East 3 20.01x
Colchester St James 2 113.64x
Milden 2 1428.57x
Nayland 2 294.12x
Newcastle On Tyne St 2 11.76x
West Ham 2 2.08x
Westham 2 263.16x
Boxford 1 200.00x
Brantham 1 322.58x
Clungunford 1 227.27x
Eastbourne 1 5.85x
Eastry 1 96.15x
Hampstead London 1 2.91x
Hillingdon 1 14.22x
Ipswich St Helen 1 31.45x
Ipswich St Mathew 1 13.30x
Monks Eleigh 1 227.27x
Newington 1 1.23x
Norton Canes 1 36.90x
Penge 1 7.10x
Portsmouth 1 9.62x
Shimpling 1 270.27x
Shoreditch London 1 1.05x
Tattingstone 1 238.10x
Trimley St Martin 1 217.39x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Whymark surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Whymark surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 15
John 11
George 10
Charles 9
Frederick 8
Walter 8
Alfred 7
James 5
Samuel 4
Arthur 3
David 3
Henry 3
Ernest 2
Frank 2
Harry 2
Robert 2
Thomas 2
Albert 1
Benjamin 1
Chas. 1
Daniel 1
Edward 1
Edwin 1
Elizabeth 1
Fredk. 1
Fredrick 1
Harris 1
Herbert 1
Herney 1
Montague 1
Moses 1
Wm. 1
Zac 1

FAQ

Whymark surname: questions and answers

How common was the Whymark surname in 1881?

In 1881, 226 people were recorded with the Whymark surname. That placed it at #11,889 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Whymark surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 548 in 2016. That gives Whymark a modern rank of #9,309.

What does the Whymark map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Whymark bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.