NameCensus.

UK surname

Beet

In the 1881 census there were 428 people recorded with the Beet surname, ranking it #7,587 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 682, ranked #7,860, down from #7,587 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, Sheffield and Blackburn. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Ashfield, Barnsley and Birmingham.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Beet is 693 in 2014. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 59.3%.

1881 census count

428

Ranked #7,587

Modern count

682

2016, ranked #7,860

Peak year

2014

693 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Beet had 428 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #7,587 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 682 in 2016, ranked #7,860.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 685 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Beet surname distribution map

The map shows where the Beet surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Beet surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Beet over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 350 #6,733
1861 historical 372 #6,857
1881 historical 428 #7,587
1891 historical 568 #6,687
1901 historical 589 #7,164
1911 historical 685 #6,182
1997 modern 654 #7,630
1998 modern 676 #7,680
1999 modern 688 #7,618
2000 modern 679 #7,671
2001 modern 657 #7,732
2002 modern 678 #7,702
2003 modern 659 #7,749
2004 modern 654 #7,796
2005 modern 636 #7,906
2006 modern 649 #7,807
2007 modern 654 #7,827
2008 modern 667 #7,761
2009 modern 686 #7,759
2010 modern 688 #7,881
2011 modern 676 #7,906
2012 modern 660 #7,975
2013 modern 675 #7,973
2014 modern 693 #7,837
2015 modern 679 #7,904
2016 modern 682 #7,860

Geography

Back to top

Where Beets are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, Sheffield, Blackburn, Birmingham Town: Birmingham and Middleton. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Ashfield, Barnsley, Birmingham and Mansfield. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
2 Sheffield Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Blackburn Lancashire
4 Birmingham Town: Birmingham Warwickshire
5 Middleton Lancashire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Ashfield 010 Ashfield
2 Barnsley 028 Barnsley
3 Birmingham 014 Birmingham
4 Birmingham 029 Birmingham
5 Mansfield 013 Mansfield

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Beet

These lists show first names that appear often with the Beet surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Beet

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Beet, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Beet surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Beet household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

City Support Workers

Within London, Beet is most associated with areas classed as City Support Workers, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Scattered throughout Inner London, these areas house relatively few workers in the most senior roles within organisations, and greater prevalence of administrative roles relative to the Supergroup mean. Residents are less likely to be of Chinese ethnicity and are more likely to have been born in Africa. Relative to the Supergroup average, residents are also more likely to live in social housing and live in overcrowded conditions.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Beet is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Beet falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Beet is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Beet, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Beet families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Beet surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 115 Beets recorded in 1881 and an index of 2.80x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 115 2.80x
Lancashire 72 1.46x
Nottinghamshire 70 12.53x
Lincolnshire 54 8.15x
Warwickshire 31 2.96x
Staffordshire 15 1.07x
Leicestershire 13 2.83x
Middlesex 12 0.29x
Derbyshire 9 1.39x
Devon 9 1.04x
Kent 7 0.49x
Durham 6 0.49x
Essex 2 0.24x
Hampshire 2 0.24x
Bedfordshire 1 0.47x
Dorset 1 0.37x
Midlothian 1 0.18x
Norfolk 1 0.16x
Oxfordshire 1 0.39x
Somerset 1 0.15x
Surrey 1 0.05x
Sussex 1 0.14x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Sheffield in Yorkshire leads with 29 Beets recorded in 1881 and an index of 22.17x.

Place Total Index
Sheffield 29 22.17x
Birmingham 26 7.46x
Middleton In Oldham 22 149.15x
Blackburn 19 14.52x
Ecclesall Bierlow 11 13.16x
New Sleaford 10 235.29x
Thurgoland 10 361.01x
Bingham 9 378.15x
Hallam 9 2195.12x
Kearsley 9 86.96x
Nether Hallam 9 16.19x
New Sealford 9 661.76x
South Collingham 9 818.18x
Cropwell Butler 8 1038.96x
Handsworth 8 23.20x
Tickhill 8 305.34x
Brightside Bierlow 7 8.69x
Ecclesfield 7 23.24x
Alfreton 6 30.43x
Boultham 6 3750.00x
Stoke Upon Trent 6 4.04x
Sunderland 6 27.55x
Warrington 6 10.29x
Chadderton 5 20.79x
Cropwell Bishop 5 555.56x
Holy Trinity 5 5.06x
Hucknall Torkard 5 35.29x
Kensington London 5 2.17x
Kimberworth 5 21.93x
Nottingham St Mary 5 3.46x
Over Darwen 5 12.73x
Scarrington 5 1666.67x
Sculcoates 5 7.68x
Sheepwash 5 847.46x
Shelford Saxondale 5 657.89x
Attercliffe Cum Darnall 4 10.45x
Dalby Little 4 1818.18x
Horncastle 4 58.48x
Loughborough 4 19.18x
Tonge 4 38.76x
Bulwell 3 24.69x
Chatham 3 7.71x
Coventry Holy Trinity 3 9.61x
East Halton 3 326.09x
Great Gonerby 3 175.44x
Hedon 3 217.39x
Newark Upon Trent 3 14.94x
Shoreditch London 3 1.67x
St Peterat Gowts Lincoln 3 32.19x
Stoke Damerel 3 4.97x
Swarby 3 1250.00x
Welby 3 545.45x
Coleby 2 327.87x
Coventry St Michael 2 5.96x
Handsworth 2 18.42x
Huddersfield 2 3.34x
Long Eaton 2 23.34x
Melton Mowbray 2 24.21x
Northwood 2 16.53x
Tonbridge 2 3.92x
West Ham 2 1.11x
Wootton 2 243.90x
Basford 1 3.88x
Bath St Michael 1 29.67x
Castleton 1 2.04x
Dunham 1 263.16x
Eaton St Andrew 1 56.50x
Halifax 1 1.66x
Horsham 1 7.36x
Londonthorpe 1 384.62x
Luton 1 2.69x
Moss Side 1 3.86x
Ossington 1 370.37x
Oxford All Sts 1 181.82x
Puddletown 1 59.88x
Rowley Regis 1 2.56x
Snenton 1 4.56x
Somerby 1 133.33x
South Kirkby 1 111.11x
Thorpe Satchville 1 416.67x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Beet surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 26
Elizabeth 16
Sarah 16
Annie 10
Eliza 10
Emma 9
Ellen 8
Agnes 7
Ann 7
Catherine 7
Fanny 7
Alice 6
Charlotte 6
Emily 6
Kate 5
Ada 4
Hannah 4
Harriet 4
Louisa 4
Margaret 4
Caroline 3
Clarice 3
Florence 3
Jane 3
Anne 2
Edith 2
Harriett 2
Levinia 2
Lucy 2
Maria 2
Amelia 1
Amy 1
Clara 1
Eleanor 1
Esther 1
Evelyn 1
Frances 1
Helen 1
Isabella 1
Janet 1
Josephine 1
Lillian 1
Linian 1
Lucella 1
Lydia 1
Martha 1
Milicent 1
Minnie 1
Nelly 1
Susan 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Beet surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 30
John 24
George 23
Thomas 16
James 11
Joseph 11
Edward 9
Arthur 8
Henry 7
Alfred 5
Charles 5
Albert 4
Frederick 4
Christopher 3
Richard 3
Walter 3
Edwin 2
Ernest 2
Frank 2
Fred 2
Harry 2
Wm.Hy. 2
Chas. 1
Chas.Henry 1
Chas.Walter 1
Clifford 1
David 1
Dickerson 1
Edgar 1
Edwd 1
Fredrick 1
Goodwin 1
Harvey 1
Herbert 1
Jas. 1
Jim 1
Jno. 1
Levi 1
Mary 1
Matthew 1
Maurice 1
Morris 1
Rebecca 1
Reuben 1
Robt. 1
Samuel 1
Thos. 1
Willie 1
Willm. 1
Wm.E. 1

FAQ

Beet surname: questions and answers

How common was the Beet surname in 1881?

In 1881, 428 people were recorded with the Beet surname. That placed it at #7,587 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Beet surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 682 in 2016. That gives Beet a modern rank of #7,860.

What does the Beet map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Beet bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.