NameCensus.

UK surname

Bellerby

In the 1881 census there were 507 people recorded with the Bellerby surname, ranking it #6,718 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 728, ranked #7,474, down from #6,718 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Otley and Gateshead. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Harrogate, Stockton-on-Tees and County Durham.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Bellerby is 770 in 2010. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 43.6%.

1881 census count

507

Ranked #6,718

Modern count

728

2016, ranked #7,474

Peak year

2010

770 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Bellerby had 507 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #6,718 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 728 in 2016, ranked #7,474.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 744 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Bellerby surname distribution map

The map shows where the Bellerby surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Bellerby surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Bellerby over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 324 #7,179
1861 historical 330 #7,721
1881 historical 507 #6,718
1891 historical 591 #6,465
1901 historical 666 #6,525
1911 historical 744 #5,769
1997 modern 715 #7,136
1998 modern 746 #7,135
1999 modern 730 #7,290
2000 modern 735 #7,220
2001 modern 725 #7,162
2002 modern 743 #7,160
2003 modern 728 #7,163
2004 modern 706 #7,344
2005 modern 700 #7,344
2006 modern 712 #7,265
2007 modern 714 #7,322
2008 modern 728 #7,264
2009 modern 754 #7,217
2010 modern 770 #7,244
2011 modern 751 #7,306
2012 modern 720 #7,452
2013 modern 729 #7,497
2014 modern 747 #7,403
2015 modern 736 #7,429
2016 modern 728 #7,474

Geography

Back to top

Where Bellerbys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside, Otley, Gateshead, Knaresborough (Bilton and Harrogate, Scriven with Tentergate, Knaresborough), Pannall and Bradford. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Harrogate, Stockton-on-Tees, County Durham and Plymouth. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Lanchester (Collierley, Kyo, Billingside, Medomsley, Ebchchester, Benfieldside, Heelyfield, Conside Durham
2 Otley Yorkshire, West Riding
3 Gateshead Durham
4 Knaresborough (Bilton and Harrogate, Scriven with Tentergate, Knaresborough), Pannall Yorkshire, West Riding
5 Bradford Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Harrogate 008 Harrogate
2 Stockton-on-Tees 006 Stockton-on-Tees
3 County Durham 036 County Durham
4 Stockton-on-Tees 004 Stockton-on-Tees
5 Plymouth 029 Plymouth

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Bellerby

These lists show first names that appear often with the Bellerby surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Bellerby

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Bellerby, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Bellerby surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Bellerby household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

London Fringe

Within London, Bellerby is most associated with areas classed as London Fringe, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Predominantly located in neighbourhoods on the outskirts of Greater London, residents of these neighbourhoods typically have their highest qualifications below degree (Level 4) level, with those still in work engaged in skilled trades and occupations in distribution, hotels and restaurants. There is low ethnic diversity in these neighbourhoods and high levels of Christian religious affiliation. Detached or terraced houses predominate, often with spare rooms.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Bellerby is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Bellerby falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Bellerby is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Bellerby, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Bellerby families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Bellerby surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 294 Bellerbys recorded in 1881 and an index of 6.03x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 294 6.03x
Durham 123 8.41x
Lancashire 32 0.55x
Northumberland 25 3.42x
Cumberland 9 2.13x
Staffordshire 5 0.30x
Hertfordshire 4 1.18x
Devon 3 0.29x
Montgomeryshire 3 2.66x
Middlesex 2 0.04x
Gloucestershire 1 0.10x
Herefordshire 1 0.50x
Leicestershire 1 0.18x
Monmouthshire 1 0.28x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Leeds in Yorkshire leads with 15 Bellerbys recorded in 1881 and an index of 5.45x.

Place Total Index
Leeds 15 5.45x
Stockton On Tees 13 18.44x
Gate Fulford 12 105.45x
Sculcoates 12 15.54x
Horwich 11 172.96x
York St Mary 11 54.51x
Bilton Cum Harrogate 10 60.02x
West Auckland 10 186.92x
York St John Delpike 10 1886.79x
Killinghall 9 789.47x
York St Cuthbert 9 201.79x
Cullercoates 8 347.83x
Dringhouses 8 1012.66x
Heworth 8 27.76x
Middlesbrough 8 12.61x
Ripon 8 70.80x
West Rainton 8 176.60x
Bishopwearmouth 7 5.58x
Bowling 7 14.51x
Clifford Cum Boston 7 159.82x
Iveston 7 103.86x
Monkwearmouth 7 50.00x
St Cuthbert W O 7 33.93x
York St Michael Le 7 443.04x
Colburn 6 3529.41x
Cowthorpe 6 2857.14x
Elswick 6 10.28x
Haswell 6 57.25x
Hornsea 6 194.17x
Kearby Cum Netherby 6 2500.00x
Mexborough 6 62.05x
Spotland 6 9.25x
Bishop Auckland 5 25.48x
Bradford 5 4.24x
Finghall Akebar 5 1923.08x
Holy Trinity 5 4.27x
Huby 5 595.24x
Huddersfield 5 7.04x
Huntington 5 505.05x
Hurworth 5 195.31x
Newcastle On Tyne St 5 13.19x
Newchurch 5 10.48x
Southcoates 5 18.48x
Staveley 5 909.09x
Strensall 5 666.67x
Winlaton 5 35.64x
Wolverhampton 5 3.92x
York St Mary Castlegate 5 349.65x
York St Saviour 5 107.53x
Bramley In Bramley 4 21.45x
Byker 4 11.06x
Cheshunt 4 33.76x
Elvet 4 37.88x
Great Bolton 4 5.18x
Helmington Row 4 58.74x
Holme On Wolds 4 1428.57x
Linthrope 4 434.78x
Long Marston 4 655.74x
Medomsley 4 58.65x
Seaton Carew 4 136.05x
Tottington Lower End 4 14.43x
Usworth 4 51.48x
Washington 4 65.25x
York St Lawrence 4 78.74x
Ainderby Quernhow 3 1500.00x
Clifton In York 3 29.44x
Eggleston 3 238.10x
Mirfield 3 11.22x
Pannal 3 64.10x
Pool 3 35.29x
York St John Micklegate 3 254.24x
Aismunderby Cum 2 144.93x
Bickerton 2 869.57x
Dalston 2 61.16x
Exeter Heavitree 2 26.21x
Framwellgate 2 23.07x
New Malton 2 34.36x
Sewerby Cum Marton 2 215.05x
Skipton On Swale 2 833.33x
Warthill Copyhold 2 625.00x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Bellerby surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 43
Jane 20
Sarah 20
Elizabeth 18
Ann 12
Annie 10
Margaret 10
Hannah 9
Ellen 5
Fanny 5
Isabella 5
Louisa 5
Lucy 5
Anne 4
Dorothy 4
Frances 4
Harriet 4
Kate 4
Ada 3
Alice 3
Edith 3
Florence 3
Agnes 2
Catherine 2
Charlotte 2
Margret 2
Martha 2
Rose 2
Anna 1
Caroline 1
Carrie 1
Clara 1
Dinah 1
Elizb. 1
Elizth. 1
Emily 1
Esther 1
Ethel 1
Faith 1
Frederick 1
Grace 1
Ida 1
Isa. 1
Isabel 1
Issabella 1
Julia 1
Kitty 1
Lavinia 1
M.E. 1
William 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Bellerby surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 45
John 40
Thomas 30
George 15
Robert 15
Henry 10
James 9
Joseph 6
Alfred 5
Charles 5
Harry 5
Edward 4
Michael 4
Richard 4
Fred 3
Herbert 3
Walter 3
Wm. 3
Albert 2
Arthur 2
Frederick 2
Lancelot 2
Matthew 2
Ralph 2
Benjn. 1
Chas. 1
Christopher 1
Clement 1
Edw. 1
Edwd. 1
Fred. 1
Fredk 1
Geo. 1
Isaac 1
Jas 1
Jim 1
Jonathan 1
Martha 1
Nathan 1
Nickolas 1
Norman 1
Oliver 1
Sam. 1
Samuel 1
Sidney 1
Simpon 1
Thos. 1
Tom 1
Wardel 1
Zaccheaus 1

FAQ

Bellerby surname: questions and answers

How common was the Bellerby surname in 1881?

In 1881, 507 people were recorded with the Bellerby surname. That placed it at #6,718 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Bellerby surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 728 in 2016. That gives Bellerby a modern rank of #7,474.

What does the Bellerby map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Bellerby bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.