NameCensus.

UK surname

Crowdy

In the 1881 census there were 182 people recorded with the Crowdy surname, ranking it #13,647 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 190, ranked #20,262, down from #13,647 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Rugby, London parishes and Lambeth. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Breckland, West Berkshire and Cornwall.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Crowdy is 269 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has stayed broadly stable by 4.4%.

1881 census count

182

Ranked #13,647

Modern count

190

2016, ranked #20,262

Peak year

1911

269 bearers

Map years

8

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Crowdy had 182 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,647 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 190 in 2016, ranked #20,262.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 269 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Outer Suburbs.

Crowdy surname distribution map

The map shows where the Crowdy surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Crowdy surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Crowdy over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 106 #16,512
1861 historical 84 #23,058
1881 historical 182 #13,647
1891 historical 214 #14,214
1901 historical 262 #12,740
1911 historical 269 #12,300
1997 modern 180 #18,812
1998 modern 191 #18,624
1999 modern 196 #18,464
2000 modern 202 #18,094
2001 modern 199 #17,996
2002 modern 208 #17,848
2003 modern 202 #18,032
2004 modern 208 #17,758
2005 modern 200 #18,144
2006 modern 207 #17,892
2007 modern 209 #17,951
2008 modern 210 #18,052
2009 modern 223 #17,735
2010 modern 220 #18,265
2011 modern 211 #18,630
2012 modern 208 #18,720
2013 modern 204 #19,276
2014 modern 198 #19,841
2015 modern 202 #19,433
2016 modern 190 #20,262

Geography

Back to top

Where Crowdys are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Rugby, London parishes, Lambeth and Reading St Giles, Shinfield (East and West Side, Hartley Dammer), Sonning (Early),. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Breckland, West Berkshire, Cornwall, South Lakeland and North Norfolk. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Rugby Warwickshire
2 London parishes London 1
3 London parishes London 3
4 Lambeth London (South Districts)
5 Reading St Giles, Shinfield (East and West Side, Hartley Dammer), Sonning (Early), Berkshire

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Breckland 009 Breckland
2 West Berkshire 008 West Berkshire
3 Cornwall 007 Cornwall
4 South Lakeland 006 South Lakeland
5 North Norfolk 005 North Norfolk

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Crowdy

These lists show first names that appear often with the Crowdy surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Crowdy

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Crowdy, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals

Group

Outer Suburbs

Nationally, the Crowdy surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Outer Suburbs, within Ethnically Diverse Suburban Professionals. This does not mean every Crowdy household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods are found on the outer edges of many towns and cities. Many residents were born outside the UK. Indian ethnic group representation is high. There are high numbers of families with dependent children aged 5 to 14. Incidences of disability and of provision of unpaid care are low. Neighbourhoods provide a mix of detached housing and flats, and terraced housing is not uncommon. Levels of overcrowding are low and homeownership rates are high. Professional and managerial occupations are prevalent: unemployment is low and education to degree level is the norm.

Wider pattern

Those working within the managerial, professional and administrative occupations typically reflect a wide range of ethnic groups, and reside in detached or semi-detached housing. Their residential locations at the edges of cities and conurbations and car-based lifestyles are more characteristic of Supergroup membership than birthplace or participation in child-rearing. Houses are typically owner-occupied and marriage rates are lower than the national average. This Supergroup is found throughout suburban UK.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Social Rented Sector Families with Children

Group

Social Rented Sector Pockets

Within London, Crowdy is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Pockets, part of Social Rented Sector Families with Children. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Found in pockets across London, residents are less likely to live in private sector rentals and fewer adults are students. Fewer individuals work in transport and communications occupations relative to the Supergroup average. More individuals identify as Black and were born in Africa.

Wider London pattern

Residents of these neighbourhoods include sizable numbers identifying with ethnicities originating outside Europe, particularly in Africa or Bangladesh. The proportion of residents identifying as White, Indian or Pakistani is well below the London average. Neighbourhood age profiles are skewed towards younger adults, and above average numbers of families have children. Rates of use of English at home are below average. Marriage rates are low, and levels of separation or divorce are above average. Housing is predominantly in flats, and renting in the social rented sector the norm - few residents are owner occupiers. Housing is often overcrowded, and neighbourhoods are amongst the most densely populated in London. Disability rates are above average, although levels of unpaid care provision are about average. Employment is in caring, leisure, other service occupations, sales and customer service, or process, plant, and machine operation. Part time working and full-time student study are common. Levels of unemployment are slightly above average. Most residents have only Level 1 or 2 educational qualifications or have completed apprenticeships.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Crowdy is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Crowdy falls in decile 8 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

8
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Crowdy is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Crowdy, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Crowdy families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Crowdy surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Middlesex leads with 29 Crowdys recorded in 1881 and an index of 1.63x.

County Total Index
Middlesex 29 1.63x
Oxfordshire 25 22.80x
Warwickshire 24 5.36x
Surrey 23 2.66x
Berkshire 20 15.01x
Kent 15 2.48x
Yorkshire 9 0.51x
Devon 7 1.89x
Hampshire 6 1.65x
Buckinghamshire 5 4.66x
Nottinghamshire 4 1.67x
Wiltshire 4 2.55x
Norfolk 3 1.10x
Lancashire 2 0.09x
Suffolk 2 0.92x
Sussex 2 0.67x
Midlothian 1 0.42x
Staffordshire 1 0.17x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Lambeth in Surrey leads with 21 Crowdys recorded in 1881 and an index of 13.57x.

Place Total Index
Lambeth 21 13.57x
Rugby 17 280.53x
Aston Rowant 13 3333.33x
Reading St Giles 11 84.16x
Kensington London 8 8.11x
St Pancras London 8 5.60x
Kimberworth 7 71.72x
Tormoham 7 44.76x
Woolwich 7 31.28x
Bramdean 6 3750.00x
Aston 5 4.06x
Herne 5 186.57x
Thame 5 251.26x
Highworth 4 199.01x
Nottingham St Mary 4 6.46x
Wycombe 4 50.00x
Great Faringdon 3 157.07x
Hampstead London 3 10.85x
Paddington London 3 4.60x
Shinfield 3 384.62x
Billesley 2 6666.67x
Camberwell 2 1.76x
Chinnor 2 263.16x
Hornsey 2 8.91x
Ipswich St Mathew 2 33.00x
Manchester 2 2.11x
Plumstead 2 9.91x
Reading St Mary 2 18.74x
Rotherham 2 20.16x
Thursford 2 1000.00x
Worth 2 92.17x
Attington 1 5000.00x
Bloxham 1 92.59x
Cheriton 1 40.49x
Ealing 1 6.30x
Edinburgh St Andrews 1 51.02x
Enfield 1 8.58x
Hedsor 1 1111.11x
Hungerford 1 55.56x
Islington London 1 0.58x
Newington 1 454.55x
Oxford St Martin 1 555.56x
Plumbstead 1 833.33x
St Andrew Holborn London 1 13.00x
St Marylebone London 1 1.06x
Sydenham 1 454.55x
Tamworth 1 31.25x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Crowdy surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Crowdy surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 15
John 11
George 10
James 7
Henry 5
Joseph 4
Richard 4
Thomas 4
Edward 3
Albert 2
Alfred 2
Arthur 2
Charles 2
Ernest 2
Stephen 2
Anthony 1
Chas. 1
Edwin 1
Francis 1
Frederick 1
Fredk. 1
Harry 1
Henery 1
Herbert 1
Samuel 1
Walter 1
Willm.A. 1

FAQ

Crowdy surname: questions and answers

How common was the Crowdy surname in 1881?

In 1881, 182 people were recorded with the Crowdy surname. That placed it at #13,647 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Crowdy surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 190 in 2016. That gives Crowdy a modern rank of #20,262.

What does the Crowdy map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Crowdy bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.