NameCensus.

UK surname

Huges

In the 1881 census there were 298 people recorded with the Huges surname, ranking it #9,765 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 92, ranked #32,035, down from #9,765 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to St Pancras, Wigan and Manchester. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Lambeth, Medway and Hackney.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Huges is 576 in 1861. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 69.1%.

1881 census count

298

Ranked #9,765

Modern count

92

2016, ranked #32,035

Peak year

1861

576 bearers

Map years

6

1851 to 1911

Key insights

  • Huges had 298 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #9,765 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 92 in 2016, ranked #32,035.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 576 in 1861.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Challenged Communities.

Huges surname distribution map

The map shows where the Huges surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Huges surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Huges over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 284 #7,977
1861 historical 576 #4,576
1881 historical 298 #9,765
1891 historical 311 #10,781
1901 historical 158 #17,507
1911 historical 210 #14,515
1997 modern 54 #32,210
1998 modern 58 #32,138
1999 modern 50 #33,041
2000 modern 58 #32,317
2001 modern 50 #32,957
2002 modern 57 #32,661
2003 modern 54 #32,990
2004 modern 63 #32,380
2005 modern 67 #32,196
2006 modern 66 #32,629
2007 modern 75 #32,079
2008 modern 77 #32,181
2009 modern 92 #30,820
2010 modern 100 #30,225
2011 modern 90 #31,564
2012 modern 83 #32,611
2013 modern 79 #33,142
2014 modern 88 #32,495
2015 modern 89 #32,325
2016 modern 92 #32,035

Geography

Back to top

Where Huges' are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around St Pancras, Wigan, Manchester, Dundee, Liff, Benvie and Invergowry and St Marylebone. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Lambeth, Medway, Hackney, Basildon and East Hampshire. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 St Pancras London (North Districts)
2 Wigan Lancashire
3 Manchester Lancashire
4 Dundee, Liff, Benvie and Invergowry Forfar
5 St Marylebone London (North Districts)

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Lambeth 009 Lambeth
2 Medway 013 Medway
3 Hackney 025 Hackney
4 Basildon 019 Basildon
5 East Hampshire 017 East Hampshire

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Huges

These lists show first names that appear often with the Huges surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Huges

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Huges, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Baseline UK

Group

Challenged Communities

Nationally, the Huges surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Challenged Communities, within Baseline UK. This does not mean every Huges household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Residents of these neighbourhoods typically live in households with dependent children, and there are fewer-than-average residents of normal retirement age or over. Identification with ethnic minorities, particularly Black, or Mixed or Multiple ethnicities is common. The rate of Christian religious affiliation is low. Housing predominantly consists of semi-detached houses, along with a significant number of terraced properties and flats. Overcrowded social housing is common, and private renting occurs at average UK levels. Those in employment work mainly in caring leisure and other services; process, plant and machine operation; or elementary occupations. Unemployment is high, and few individuals have degree level qualifications. Many of these neighbourhoods occur in commuter towns or less accessible areas of larger towns and cities.

Wider pattern

This Supergroup exemplifies the broad base to the UK’s social structure, encompassing as it does the average or modal levels of many neighbourhood characteristics, including all housing tenures, a range of levels of educational attainment and religious affiliations, and a variety of pre-retirement age structures. Yet, in combination, these mixes are each distinctive of the parts of the UK. Overall, terraced houses and flats are the most prevalent, as is employment in intermediate or low-skilled occupations. However, this Supergroup is also characterised by above average levels of unemployment and lower levels of use of English as the main language. Many neighbourhoods occur in south London and the UK’s other major urban centres.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers

Within London, Huges is most associated with areas classed as Social Rented Sector Professional Support Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Mainly located in Inner London, these neighbourhoods retain a diverse employment structure, with some concentration in associated professional and technical occupations rather than skilled trades or construction. Social renting is more common and levels of homeownership are low. Many residents identify as Black. There is a lower than average rate of marriage or civil partnership, few that are very old (85 or over) and higher than average incidence of disability.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Huges is most concentrated in decile 10 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

10
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Huges falls in decile 3 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

3
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Huges is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 50-60 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

8
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Huges, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Huges families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Huges surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 40 Huges' recorded in 1881 and an index of 1.46x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 40 1.46x
Lancashire 31 0.95x
Middlesex 19 0.69x
Warwickshire 19 2.73x
Angus 17 6.65x
Derbyshire 14 3.24x
Staffordshire 13 1.40x
Sussex 13 2.79x
Devon 12 2.09x
Durham 10 1.22x
Pembrokeshire 9 10.26x
Kent 8 0.85x
Lanarkshire 7 0.78x
Wiltshire 7 2.87x
Glamorgan 6 1.25x
Surrey 6 0.45x
Caernarfonshire 5 4.48x
Hampshire 5 0.88x
Gloucestershire 4 0.74x
Herefordshire 4 3.53x
Monmouthshire 4 2.00x
Shropshire 4 1.68x
Ayrshire 3 1.45x
Berkshire 3 1.45x
Merionethshire 3 5.94x
Midlothian 3 0.81x
Cheshire 2 0.33x
Somerset 2 0.45x
Brecknockshire 1 1.81x
Carmarthenshire 1 0.86x
Cornwall 1 0.32x
Dumfriesshire 1 1.64x
Fife 1 0.61x
Isle of Man 1 1.95x
Lincolnshire 1 0.23x
Norfolk 1 0.24x
Perthshire 1 0.81x
Stirlingshire 1 0.98x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Liff Benvie in Angus leads with 17 Huges' recorded in 1881 and an index of 43.79x.

Place Total Index
Liff Benvie 17 43.79x
Birmingham 16 6.90x
Brighton 10 10.65x
Leeds 8 5.18x
Manningham 8 23.74x
Thornaby 8 78.28x
Chinley Bugsworth 7 614.04x
Exeter St Kerrian 7 1750.00x
Swinton In Rotherham 7 96.82x
Barony 6 2.66x
Liverpool 6 3.02x
Llanychaer 6 4000.00x
Ormesby 6 81.63x
Canterbury St Alphage 5 495.05x
Handsworth 5 21.77x
Llanaelhaiarn 5 364.96x
Llanwonno 5 28.95x
Bedwellty 4 11.35x
Donhead St Mary 4 322.58x
Hackney London 4 2.58x
Litchurch 4 23.00x
Plymouth St Andrew 4 9.04x
St George Hanover Square 4 8.22x
Stockton On Tees 4 10.10x
Sunderland 4 27.59x
Amroth 3 434.78x
Beith 3 48.70x
Blackburn 3 3.44x
Fareham 3 44.12x
Islington London 3 1.12x
Mallwyd 3 243.90x
Manchester 3 2.04x
Newhaven 3 79.37x
Rotherhithe 3 8.80x
Tettenhall 3 52.63x
Battersea 2 1.97x
Chorlton On Medlock 2 3.84x
Eccleston In Prescot 2 12.17x
Edinburgh Buccleuch 2 22.86x
Ellesmere 2 48.90x
Frome 2 18.81x
Hulme 2 2.92x
Kensington London 2 1.30x
Ledbury 2 51.41x
Minchinhampton 2 46.40x
Paddington London 2 1.97x
Portsea 2 1.80x
Ross 2 44.44x
St Marylebone London 2 1.36x
Stratford On Avon 2 51.81x
Stratton St Margaret 2 53.48x
Sulhamstead Banister 2 833.33x
West Derby 2 2.09x
Abbotshall 1 16.37x
Binfield 1 62.89x
Charlton 1 15.97x
Chesterfield 1 6.17x
Denton 1 13.77x
Dukinfield 1 3.55x
Falmouth 1 9.04x
Gorton 1 3.25x
Hedworth Monkton Jarrow 1 2.81x
Higher Booths 1 16.95x
Hillmorton 1 80.65x
Kearsley 1 14.51x
Kilsyth 1 15.41x
Laycock 1 90.09x
Llanwinio 1 119.05x
Pancrasweek 1 322.58x
Perth West Church 1 17.01x
Poulton Barre 1 26.81x
Runcorn 1 7.12x
Scarborough 1 4.02x
Scarcliff 1 172.41x
Shifnal 1 15.46x
Stretford 1 5.55x
Toxteth Park 1 0.90x
West Bromwich 1 1.87x
Wollaston 1 322.58x
Wolverhampton 1 1.40x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Huges surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 15
Elizabeth 13
Sarah 11
Ann 5
Jane 5
Alice 4
Margaret 4
Eliza 3
Hannah 3
Rose 3
Agnes 2
Anna 2
Anne 2
Annie 2
Catherine 2
Charlotte 2
Emma 2
Henrietta 2
Lucy 2
Margret 2
Beatrice 1
Cathrine 1
Cecilea 1
Cecily 1
Charles 1
Deanna 1
Dora 1
Elizaberth 1
Elizh. 1
Elizth. 1
Ester 1
Esther 1
Florence 1
Gertrude 1
Harriet 1
Jean 1
Jennetta 1
Kate 1
Lillian 1
Lorain 1
Lottie 1
Louisa 1
Maria 1
Martha 1
Matila 1
Maud 1
Plyis 1
Selina 1
Sephera 1
Thomasine 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Huges surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 20
William 13
George 10
Thomas 10
Joseph 7
Edward 6
James 6
Alfred 4
Charles 4
Hugh 4
Robert 4
Evan 3
Harry 3
Daniel 2
David 2
Martin 2
Samuel 2
Ambrose 1
Arthur 1
Cyrus 1
Edwards 1
Eli 1
Ellis 1
Frances 1
Frank 1
Frederick 1
H. 1
Hanah 1
Henery 1
Henry 1
Hewelyn 1
Jacob 1
Michell 1
Moses 1
Patsey 1
Peter 1
Phillip 1
Richard 1
Robt. 1
Samson 1
Stephen 1
Walter 1

FAQ

Huges surname: questions and answers

How common was the Huges surname in 1881?

In 1881, 298 people were recorded with the Huges surname. That placed it at #9,765 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Huges surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 92 in 2016. That gives Huges a modern rank of #32,035.

What does the Huges map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Huges bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.