NameCensus.

UK surname

Younghusband

In the 1881 census there were 359 people recorded with the Younghusband surname, ranking it #8,614 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 241, ranked #17,233, down from #8,614 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Newcastle St Andrew, St Bees and Gateshead. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include County Durham, Sunderland and St Albans.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Younghusband is 359 in 1881. Compared with 1881, the name has fallen by 32.9%.

1881 census count

359

Ranked #8,614

Modern count

241

2016, ranked #17,233

Peak year

1881

359 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Younghusband had 359 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #8,614 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 241 in 2016, ranked #17,233.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 359 in 1881.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Established but Challenged.

Younghusband surname distribution map

The map shows where the Younghusband surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Younghusband surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Younghusband over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 337 #6,953
1861 historical 266 #9,318
1881 historical 359 #8,614
1891 historical 334 #10,198
1901 historical 335 #10,782
1911 historical 333 #10,624
1997 modern 245 #15,483
1998 modern 261 #15,241
1999 modern 267 #15,097
2000 modern 257 #15,468
2001 modern 247 #15,637
2002 modern 256 #15,565
2003 modern 247 #15,733
2004 modern 250 #15,695
2005 modern 251 #15,590
2006 modern 247 #15,860
2007 modern 243 #16,243
2008 modern 248 #16,163
2009 modern 250 #16,421
2010 modern 265 #16,115
2011 modern 260 #16,188
2012 modern 251 #16,467
2013 modern 247 #16,935
2014 modern 253 #16,774
2015 modern 247 #16,941
2016 modern 241 #17,233

Geography

Back to top

Where Younghusbands are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Newcastle St Andrew, St Bees, Gateshead, Workington (Workington), Clossocks and Dearham. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to County Durham, Sunderland, St Albans, South Kesteven and South Tyneside. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Newcastle St Andrew Northumberland
2 St Bees Cumberland
3 Gateshead Durham
4 Workington (Workington), Clossocks Cumberland
5 Dearham Cumberland

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 County Durham 059 County Durham
2 Sunderland 032 Sunderland
3 St Albans 005 St Albans
4 South Kesteven 012 South Kesteven
5 South Tyneside 001 South Tyneside

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Younghusband

These lists show first names that appear often with the Younghusband surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Younghusband

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Younghusband, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Established but Challenged

Nationally, the Younghusband surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Established but Challenged, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Younghusband household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

Many households in these neighbourhoods comprise separated or divorced single parents with dependent children. Residents are typically born in the UK, and these neighbourhoods have relatively few members of ethnic minorities. The prevalence of children, their parents and those at or above normal retirement age, suggests neighbourhood structures may be long-established. Levels of unpaid care are high, and long-term disability is more common than in the Supergroup as a whole. Use of the social rented sector is common, often in terraced houses. Levels of overcrowding are above the Supergroup average. Unemployment is high, while those in work are employed in elementary occupations such as caring, leisure and customer services. Many residents have low level qualifications. Neighbourhood concentrations of this Group are found in the South Wales Valleys, Belfast, Londonderry and the Central Lowlands of Scotland.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Central Connected Professionals and Managers

Group

Senior Professionals

Within London, Younghusband is most associated with areas classed as Senior Professionals, part of Central Connected Professionals and Managers. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These very central neighbourhoods house residents whose ages are more skewed towards older age cohorts than elsewhere in the Supergroup. Few households have young children. Rates of illness are low. Indian ethnicity is rare compared to the Supergroup mean. Property under occupation is more common, despite the centrality of neighbourhoods, and more residents live in communal establishments than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

Adult residents of these neighbourhoods are typically aged 25 to 44, working full-time in professional, managerial or associate professional occupations. There are few families with dependent children. The predominantly Inner London neighbourhoods have an international character, including many residents born elsewhere in Europe alongside high numbers of individuals identifying as of Chinese ethnicity. Many individuals are never married, childless and/or living alone. Above average numbers of individuals, likely to be full-time students, live in communal establishments. Elsewhere, privately rented flats are the dominant housing type. Residents of these areas are well-qualified, with a significant number holding Level 4 or above qualifications. There is a correspondingly high level of individuals employed full-time in professional, managerial and associated professional or technical occupations. Employing industries are financial, real estate, professional, administration, and, to a lesser degree, transport and communications. Unemployment is uncommon.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Younghusband is most concentrated in decile 5 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname near the middle of the scale.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

5
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Younghusband falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Younghusband is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Younghusband, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Younghusband families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Younghusband surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Cumberland leads with 108 Younghusbands recorded in 1881 and an index of 35.62x.

County Total Index
Cumberland 108 35.62x
Durham 50 4.77x
Lancashire 44 1.05x
Northumberland 39 7.44x
Yorkshire 22 0.63x
Middlesex 21 0.60x
Hampshire 16 2.22x
Surrey 16 0.93x
Berkshire 8 3.03x
Dorset 6 2.60x
Essex 6 0.86x
Gloucestershire 5 0.72x
Devon 4 0.55x
Kent 2 0.17x
Somerset 2 0.35x
Sussex 2 0.34x
Warwickshire 2 0.23x
Westmorland 2 2.58x
Channel Islands 1 0.96x
Cheshire 1 0.13x
Isle of Man 1 1.53x
Lincolnshire 1 0.18x
Northamptonshire 1 0.30x
Roxburghshire 1 1.57x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Bishopwearmouth in Durham leads with 17 Younghusbands recorded in 1881 and an index of 18.90x.

Place Total Index
Bishopwearmouth 17 18.90x
Leeds 15 7.61x
Whitehaven 15 92.82x
Crosscanonby 13 129.61x
Portsea 13 9.19x
Workington 13 74.88x
Keswick 12 309.28x
Dearham 11 275.00x
Gateshead 9 11.47x
Liverpool 9 3.55x
Cockermouth 8 125.39x
Croydon 8 8.40x
Elswick 8 19.13x
Gorton 8 20.37x
Newcastle On Tyne All Sts 8 25.57x
Newcastle On Tyne St 8 29.46x
St Cuthbert W O 8 54.13x
Reading St Giles 7 27.00x
St Marylebone London 7 3.72x
Westgate 7 21.57x
Darlington 6 14.83x
Melcombe Regis 6 62.63x
Newington 6 4.61x
Sheffield 6 5.40x
Witton Le Wear 6 202.02x
Blackburn 5 4.50x
Chorlton On Medlock 5 7.53x
Clifton 5 14.32x
Plumbland 5 641.03x
Sebergham 5 746.27x
Clerkenwell London 4 4.81x
Great Crosby 4 35.12x
Hulme 4 4.59x
Penrith 4 35.71x
Westward 4 314.96x
Caldbeck 3 211.27x
Dawlish 3 54.84x
East Ham 3 23.26x
Hartlepool 3 20.15x
Pendleton In Salford 3 6.03x
Shildon 3 35.63x
Tynemouth 3 10.69x
Woodford 3 38.12x
Askham 2 322.58x
Freshford 2 408.16x
Heworth 2 9.69x
Hornsey 2 4.49x
Hutton Roof 2 1000.00x
Kenilworth 2 39.92x
Keymer 2 47.73x
Longbenton 2 9.01x
Portsmouth 2 12.03x
Preston 2 1.79x
Salford 2 1.63x
St Bees 2 142.86x
Toxteth Park 2 1.41x
Trimdon 2 54.05x
Westoe 2 3.37x
Arlecdon 1 12.41x
Birkenhead 1 1.61x
Bromley 1 5.46x
Camberwell 1 0.44x
Chelsea London 1 0.94x
Coleby 1 192.31x
Ealing 1 3.18x
Hackney London 1 0.51x
Manningham 1 2.33x
North Shields 1 9.56x
Onchan 1 5.31x
Sandhurst 1 19.53x
Sevenoaks 1 10.27x
St George Hanover 1 2.18x
St Helier 1 2.94x
St Pancras London 1 0.35x
Stoke Newington London 1 3.65x
Ventnor 1 14.58x
Wellingborough 1 6.01x
Westminster St John 1 2.33x
Wigton 1 21.98x
Wilton 1 14.29x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Younghusband surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 26
Elizabeth 21
Jane 13
Sarah 13
Margaret 8
Ann 7
Eliza 6
Alice 5
Martha 5
Eleanor 4
Hannah 4
Annie 3
Caroline 3
Charlotte 3
Clara 3
Emily 3
Fanny 3
Harriet 3
Isabella 3
Jessie 3
Ada 2
Agnes 2
Blanche 2
Georgina 2
Leonora 2
Amelia 1
Anne 1
Carrie 1
Catherine 1
Dinah 1
Dora 1
Dorothy 1
Edith 1
Elizh. 1
Elizth. 1
Emma 1
Ernastine 1
Esther 1
Ethel 1
Florence 1
Frances 1
Gertrude 1
Grace 1
Helen 1
Kate 1
Katherine 1
Lilly 1
Louisa 1
M.E. 1
Thereza 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Younghusband surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
John 26
William 21
George 13
Joseph 11
Thomas 10
David 5
Henry 4
Arthur 3
Charles 3
Frank 3
Lancelot 3
Richard 3
Robert 3
Thos. 3
Albert 2
Alexander 2
Ernest 2
Francis 2
Isaac 2
Jacob 2
James 2
Jonathan 2
Oswald 2
Samuel 2
Wm. 2
Edgar 1
Edward 1
Ephraim 1
F.J. 1
Frederick 1
Geo.T. 1
Harriet 1
Harrison 1
Harry 1
J.H. 1
J.W. 1
Jeffrey 1
Johnathan 1
Jonathon 1
Leslie 1
Mathew 1
Matthew 1
N.B. 1
Percival 1
Percy 1
Peter 1
Preston 1
Rrichard 1
Thos 1
Wm.J. 1

FAQ

Younghusband surname: questions and answers

How common was the Younghusband surname in 1881?

In 1881, 359 people were recorded with the Younghusband surname. That placed it at #8,614 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Younghusband surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 241 in 2016. That gives Younghusband a modern rank of #17,233.

What does the Younghusband map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Younghusband bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.