NameCensus.

UK surname

Bearder

In the 1881 census there were 182 people recorded with the Bearder surname, ranking it #13,647 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 248, ranked #16,910, down from #13,647 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Calverley, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard and Nottingham St Mary. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Bolsover, Bassetlaw and Bradford.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Bearder is 289 in 1999. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 36.3%.

1881 census count

182

Ranked #13,647

Modern count

248

2016, ranked #16,910

Peak year

1999

289 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Bearder had 182 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #13,647 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 248 in 2016, ranked #16,910.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 245 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Young Families in Industrial Towns.

Bearder surname distribution map

The map shows where the Bearder surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Bearder surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Bearder over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 125 #14,700
1861 historical 110 #19,562
1881 historical 182 #13,647
1891 historical 222 #13,854
1901 historical 223 #14,134
1911 historical 245 #13,084
1997 modern 245 #15,483
1998 modern 275 #14,715
1999 modern 289 #14,320
2000 modern 269 #14,983
2001 modern 267 #14,839
2002 modern 255 #15,599
2003 modern 258 #15,293
2004 modern 252 #15,618
2005 modern 245 #15,857
2006 modern 245 #15,956
2007 modern 242 #16,296
2008 modern 249 #16,111
2009 modern 247 #16,549
2010 modern 257 #16,476
2011 modern 264 #16,016
2012 modern 261 #16,041
2013 modern 260 #16,350
2014 modern 263 #16,334
2015 modern 251 #16,756
2016 modern 248 #16,910

Geography

Back to top

Where Bearders are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Calverley, Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard, Nottingham St Mary, Bradford and Sheffield. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Bolsover, Bassetlaw and Bradford. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Calverley Yorkshire, West Riding
2 Lenton, Radford, Papplewick, Nuthall, Greasley, Brewhouse Yard Nottinghamshire
3 Nottingham St Mary Nottinghamshire
4 Bradford Yorkshire, West Riding
5 Sheffield Yorkshire, West Riding

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Bolsover 010 Bolsover
2 Bolsover 009 Bolsover
3 Bolsover 007 Bolsover
4 Bassetlaw 016 Bassetlaw
5 Bradford 022 Bradford

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Bearder

These lists show first names that appear often with the Bearder surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Bearder

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Bearder, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce

Group

Young Families in Industrial Towns

Nationally, the Bearder surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Young Families in Industrial Towns, within Semi- and Un-Skilled Workforce. This does not mean every Bearder household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods house predominantly young, UK-born individuals identifying with a White ethnic group with dependent children. Long-term disability and unpaid care are prevalent, and religious affiliations are uncommon. Housing is terraced or semi-detached and social rented sector housing is the norm. Unemployment is above the Supergroup average, and employment is principally in elementary occupations, as process plant and machine operatives, or in caring and leisure services. Educational attainment is low. The group is scattered throughout former industrial towns in the Midlands and the South Wales Valleys.

Wider pattern

Living in terraced or semi-detached houses, residents of these neighbourhoods typically lack high levels of education and work in elementary or routine service occupations. Unemployment is above average. Residents are predominantly born in the UK, and residents are also predominantly from ethnic minorities. Social (but not private sector) rented sector housing is common. This Supergroup is found throughout the UK’s conurbations and industrial regions but is also an integral part of smaller towns.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

The Greater London Mix

Group

Skilled Trades and Construction Workers

Within London, Bearder is most associated with areas classed as Skilled Trades and Construction Workers, part of The Greater London Mix. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These scattered, peripheral and often low residential density neighbourhoods house more workers in skilled trades and construction. Few households rent social housing and there are few students. Multiple car ownership is higher than the Supergroup average, perhaps because of poorer public transport connectivity. Incidence of mixed or multiple ethnicity is below the Supergroup average, and the absence of individuals identifying as Pakistani or Other Asian groups is also less pronounced. Flatted accommodation is less dominant than elsewhere in the Supergroup.

Wider London pattern

A Supergroup embodying London's diversity in many respects, apart from low numbers of residents identifying as of Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani or Other (non-Chinese) Asian ethnicity. There is lower than average prevalence of families with dependent children, while there are above average occurrences of never-married individuals and single-person households. The age distribution is skewed towards younger, single residents and couples without children, with many individuals identifying as of mixed or multiple ethnicity. Social rented or private rented housing is slightly more prevalent than average, and many residents live in flats. Individuals typically work in professional and associated roles in public administration, education or health rather than in elementary occupations in agriculture, energy, water, construction or manufacturing. Incidence of students is slightly below average. Individuals declaring no religion are more prevalent than average and non-use of English at home is below average.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Bearder is most concentrated in decile 8 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the healthier end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

8
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Bearder falls in decile 1 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the more deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

1
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Bearder is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 60-70 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

9
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Bearder, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Bearder families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Bearder surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Yorkshire leads with 128 Bearders recorded in 1881 and an index of 7.28x.

County Total Index
Yorkshire 128 7.28x
Nottinghamshire 36 15.04x
Lancashire 9 0.43x
Flintshire 6 12.57x
Cumberland 1 0.65x
Hampshire 1 0.27x
Middlesex 1 0.06x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Sheffield in Yorkshire leads with 31 Bearders recorded in 1881 and an index of 55.35x.

Place Total Index
Sheffield 31 55.35x
Bowling 29 166.48x
Pudsey 21 223.40x
Ecclesall Bierlow 17 47.51x
Nottingham St Mary 16 25.85x
Lenton 12 212.77x
Brightside Bierlow 11 31.88x
Worksop 8 112.68x
Gorton 7 35.35x
Tong 7 205.88x
Bradford 6 14.09x
Attercliffe Cum Darnall 5 30.51x
Mold 5 115.47x
Manchester 2 2.11x
Alverstoke 1 7.59x
Irton With Santon 1 263.16x
Nether Hallam 1 4.20x
Rhuddlan 1 23.81x
St Marylebone London 1 1.06x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Bearder surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Elizabeth 11
Sarah 10
Mary 9
Ann 4
Annie 4
Eliza 4
Emma 4
Martha 4
Fanny 3
Harriet 3
Alice 2
Ellen 2
Hannah 2
Julia 2
Rebecca 2
Ruth 2
Agnes 1
Amelia 1
Caroline 1
Charlotte 1
Edith 1
Eliz. 1
Elizth. 1
Ellin 1
Emily 1
Esther 1
Ethel 1
Florence 1
Gertrude 1
Halley 1
Hannace 1
Isabella 1
Jane 1
Lilian 1
Lilly 1
Louisa 1
Marey 1
Margaret 1
Matilda 1
Nancy 1
Rosamond 1
Rosie 1
Victoria 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Bearder surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 11
James 10
John 10
Joseph 7
Arthur 4
George 3
Henry 3
Thomas 3
Alfred 2
Edwin 2
Frank 2
Harrison 2
Hiram 2
Job 2
Wilfred 2
Aaron 1
Abraham 1
Alexander 1
Allan 1
Benjamin 1
Cyril 1
Emmanuel 1
Firth 1
Fred 1
Fredrick 1
Harry 1
Hillas 1
Jacob 1
Jonathan 1
Nelson 1
Noel 1
Rob. 1
Sagar 1
Sam 1
Seth 1
Stead 1
Wm. 1

FAQ

Bearder surname: questions and answers

How common was the Bearder surname in 1881?

In 1881, 182 people were recorded with the Bearder surname. That placed it at #13,647 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Bearder surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 248 in 2016. That gives Bearder a modern rank of #16,910.

What does the Bearder map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Bearder bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.