NameCensus.

UK surname

Fuggle

In the 1881 census there were 229 people recorded with the Fuggle surname, ranking it #11,784 among surnames in the records. By 2016, the modern count was 272, ranked #15,832, down from #11,784 in 1881.

The strongest historical links point to Tunbridge, Bidborough, Brenchley and Yalding, Aylesford, Burham, Mereworth, Wateringbury, Nettlestead. In the modern distribution records, the strongest local clusters include Ashford, Shepway and Purbeck.

Across the surname records, the highest recorded count for Fuggle is 342 in 1911. Compared with 1881, the name has grown by 18.8%.

1881 census count

229

Ranked #11,784

Modern count

272

2016, ranked #15,832

Peak year

1911

342 bearers

Map years

9

1851 to 2016

Key insights

  • Fuggle had 229 recorded bearers in 1881, making it the #11,784 surname in that year.
  • The latest modern count shown here is 272 in 2016, ranked #15,832.
  • Within the historical census years, the highest count was 342 in 1911.
  • The contemporary neighbourhood profile most associated with the surname is Rural Amenity.

Fuggle surname distribution map

The map shows where the Fuggle surname is concentrated in each census or modern distribution year. Darker areas mean a stronger local concentration.

Distribution map

Fuggle surname density by area, 1881 census.

Loading map
Lower densityMedium densityHigh density

Timeline

Back to top

Fuggle over time

The table below tracks recorded surname counts and rank from the 19th-century census years through the modern adult-register period.

Year Period Count Rank
1851 historical 149 #12,967
1861 historical 157 #14,732
1881 historical 229 #11,784
1891 historical 235 #13,316
1901 historical 316 #11,242
1911 historical 342 #10,445
1997 modern 330 #12,701
1998 modern 324 #13,189
1999 modern 335 #12,993
2000 modern 336 #12,921
2001 modern 339 #12,641
2002 modern 334 #13,045
2003 modern 316 #13,355
2004 modern 313 #13,502
2005 modern 293 #14,030
2006 modern 288 #14,267
2007 modern 287 #14,464
2008 modern 285 #14,647
2009 modern 283 #15,020
2010 modern 294 #14,940
2011 modern 296 #14,729
2012 modern 285 #15,050
2013 modern 289 #15,142
2014 modern 280 #15,621
2015 modern 283 #15,380
2016 modern 272 #15,832

Geography

Back to top

Where Fuggles are most common

Historical parish links are strongest around Tunbridge, Bidborough, Brenchley, Yalding, Aylesford, Burham, Mereworth, Wateringbury, Nettlestead, Maidstone, Linton, Loddington and Halden, High. These are the places where the surname stands out most clearly in the older records.

The modern local-area list points to Ashford, Shepway, Purbeck, Rother and Wealden. Treat these as concentration signals, not proof that every family line began there.

Some modern areas include a three-digit suffix, such as Leeds 110. The suffix is a small-area code, so it stays in the table while the prose uses the plain place name.

Top historical parishes

Rank Parish Area
1 Tunbridge, Bidborough Kent
2 Brenchley Kent
3 Yalding, Aylesford, Burham, Mereworth, Wateringbury, Nettlestead Kent
4 Maidstone, Linton, Loddington Kent
5 Halden, High Kent

Top modern areas

Rank Area District
1 Ashford 013 Ashford
2 Shepway 002 Shepway
3 Purbeck 003 Purbeck
4 Rother 001 Rother
5 Wealden 005 Wealden

Forenames

Back to top

First names often paired with Fuggle

These lists show first names that appear often with the Fuggle surname in historical and recent records.

Modern profile

Back to top

Neighbourhood profile for Fuggle

Modern surname records can be compared with neighbourhood classifications. For Fuggle, this points to the kinds of places where the surname is most concentrated today.

These neighbourhood labels describe areas, not individual people. They are useful because surnames often cluster through family history, migration, housing patterns and local work. A surname can be strongest in one type of neighbourhood even when people with that name live across the country.

The UK classification gives the national picture. The London classification is more specific to the capital, where housing, age profile, tenure and population mix can look quite different from the rest of the UK.

UK neighbourhood type

UK Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities

Group

Rural Amenity

Nationally, the Fuggle surname is most associated with neighbourhoods classed as Rural Amenity, within Suburbanites and Peri-Urbanities. This does not mean every Fuggle household fits that profile, but it gives a useful signal about where the modern surname distribution is strongest.

Read profile summary

Group profile

This Group comprises older parents or retirees, with no resident dependent children, and with the lowest residential densities in this Supergroup. Predominantly UK-born, residents typically live in detached houses, although others do live in semi-detached and terraced properties. The level of multiple car ownership is the highest in this Supergroup. Most houses are owner occupied although social renting is also present. Many concentrations occur in high amenity rural locations, such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Wider pattern

Pervasive throughout the UK, members of this Supergroup typically own (or are buying) their detached, semi-detached or terraced homes. They are also typically educated to A Level/Highers or degree level and work in skilled or professional occupations. Typically born in the UK, some families have children, although the median adult age is above 45 and some property has become under-occupied after children have left home. This Supergroup is pervasive not only in suburban locations, but also in neighbourhoods at or beyond the edge of cities that adjoin rural parts of the country.

London neighbourhood type

London Output Area Classification

Supergroup

Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs

Group

Professional Periphery

Within London, Fuggle is most associated with areas classed as Professional Periphery, part of Older Residents in Owner-Occupied Suburbs. This gives the surname a London-specific profile rather than forcing the capital into the same pattern as the rest of the country.

Read profile summary

Group profile

These neighbourhoods predominantly house residents aged 45+, with many aged 85+. Most employed residents work in senior roles, and relatively few work in unskilled jobs. Terraced housing is comparatively rare, but communal living is more common. More residents identify as of Indian ethnicity and more affiliate with non-Christian religions. Disability levels are below the Supergroup average.

Wider London pattern

The age distribution of these neighbourhoods is skewed towards the middle-aged and old, although few residents live alone or in communal establishments and numbers of dependent children are around average. Owner occupation is the norm, as is residence in detached or semi-detached houses. Residential densities are low and many households have spare rooms. Most residents were born in the UK and, aside from some identifying as members of Chinese or Indian ethnicities, identify as White. Mixed ethnicity households are rare. Incidence of married couples is higher than average and few individuals have never been married. A large proportion of individuals still in employment work in administrative and secretarial occupations, or in the construction industry. Few residents are students, and many households own more than one car.

Healthy neighbourhoods

Access to healthy assets and hazards

Fuggle is most concentrated in decile 2 for access to healthy assets and hazards. This places the surname towards the less healthy end of the index.

Lower deciles point towards weaker access to healthy assets or stronger exposure to local hazards. Higher deciles point towards stronger access and fewer hazards.

2
Lower access Higher access

Neighbourhood deprivation

Index of Multiple Deprivation

Fuggle falls in decile 10 for neighbourhood deprivation. This puts the surname towards the less deprived end of the index.

Decile 1 represents the more deprived end of the scale. Decile 10 represents the less deprived end.

10
More deprived Less deprived

Broadband speed

Fixed broadband download speed

The modern neighbourhood pattern for Fuggle is most associated with a typical fixed broadband download band of 30-40 mbit/s.

The scale below places that band in context, from slower local download bands through to faster ones.

6
Slower band Faster band

Area snapshot

Ethnic group estimate

Most common ethnic group estimate
White - British

This describes the area pattern most associated with Fuggle, not the ethnicity of every person with the surname.

1881 census detail

Back to top

Fuggle families in the 1881 census

These tables use 1881 census entries for people recorded with the Fuggle surname. Use the location tables for concentration, then the name and occupation tables for the people behind the surname.

Top counties

Total is the county count. Frequency and index adjust for local population size, so they are better concentration signals. Kent leads with 161 Fuggles recorded in 1881 and an index of 21.41x.

County Total Index
Kent 161 21.41x
Sussex 26 7.00x
Surrey 9 0.84x
Middlesex 8 0.36x
Essex 7 1.61x
Berkshire 5 3.02x
Worcestershire 5 1.74x
Hertfordshire 4 2.63x
Gloucestershire 1 0.23x

Top districts and towns

Districts give a more local view than counties. Total shows raw records, while frequency and index show local concentration. Tenterden in Kent leads with 79 Fuggles recorded in 1881 and an index of 2981.13x.

Place Total Index
Tenterden 79 2981.13x
High Halden 13 2708.33x
Hastings St Mary 10 108.11x
Wittersham 9 1343.28x
Orlestone 8 2580.65x
Camberwell 7 4.97x
Lewisham 7 17.45x
Speldhurst 7 182.77x
West Ham 7 7.29x
Brighton 6 8.00x
Chart Sutton 6 1153.85x
Sevenoaks 6 98.36x
Brenchley 5 185.87x
Islington London 5 2.34x
New Windsor 5 89.93x
Worcester All Sts 5 299.40x
Brede 4 512.82x
Bushey 4 110.50x
Tonbridge 4 14.74x
Yalding 4 210.53x
Lydd 3 186.34x
Strood 3 69.93x
Petham 2 384.62x
Rye 2 56.66x
Uckfield 2 123.46x
Warehorne 2 500.00x
Clayton 1 71.43x
Ewell 1 44.05x
Gillingham 1 6.45x
Greenwich 1 2.85x
Hampstead London 1 2.91x
Mitcheldean 1 185.19x
Southwark Christchurch 1 9.68x
St Pancras London 1 0.56x
Sutton Valence 1 117.65x
Tottenham 1 2.85x
Wadhurst 1 40.98x

Top female names

These are the female first names most often recorded with the Fuggle surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
Mary 16
Elizabeth 13
Sarah 9
Ellen 8
Emily 7
Jane 5
Alice 4
Emma 4
Anne 3
Charlotte 3
Florence 3
Hannah 3
Agnes 2
Caroline 2
Fanny 2
Francis 2
Ada 1
Adelia 1
Agatha 1
Ann 1
Carrie 1
Eliz. 1
Eliza 1
Esther 1
Eva 1
Evelyn 1
Frances 1
Geborah 1
Harriet 1
Henrietta 1
Julia 1
Kate 1
Laura 1
Lilian 1
Margaret 1
Marion 1
Matilda 1
Nellie 1
Orpah 1
Pheby 1
Sofrona 1
Violetta 1

Top male names

These are the male first names most often recorded with the Fuggle surname in 1881. Names are not merged, so initials, variant spellings and transcription quirks can appear as separate rows.

Name Count
William 10
George 8
John 8
Charles 6
Thomas 6
James 5
Arthur 4
Frank 4
Joseph 4
Albert 3
Alfred 3
Edward 3
Herbert 3
Horace 3
Richard 3
Abner 2
Ernest 2
Frederick 2
Harry 2
Henry 2
Jno. 2
Stephen 2
Thos. 2
Ambrose 1
Amos 1
Benjn. 1
Chas. 1
Edgar 1
Edwin 1
Fred 1
Gibeon 1
Hary 1
Jack 1
Louis 1
Nelson 1
Oberon 1
Octavius 1
Oliver 1
Os... 1
Percival 1
Philip 1
Prime 1
Sam.Luenden 1
Samuel 1
Seaman 1
Wallace 1
Willie 1
Wm.Henry 1

FAQ

Fuggle surname: questions and answers

How common was the Fuggle surname in 1881?

In 1881, 229 people were recorded with the Fuggle surname. That placed it at #11,784 in the surname rankings for that year.

How common is the Fuggle surname today?

The latest modern count shown here is 272 in 2016. That gives Fuggle a modern rank of #15,832.

What does the Fuggle map show?

The map shows local surname concentration for the selected year. Darker areas have a stronger concentration of Fuggle bearers relative to the surrounding population.

What records is this surname page based on?

The historical counts come from census surname records. The modern counts and neighbourhood summaries come from later surname distribution records. Counts are recorded bearers in those records, not a live estimate of everyone with the name today.